Loading…
The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence
We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of mo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economics letters 2018-08, Vol.169, p.55-58 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3 |
container_end_page | 58 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 55 |
container_title | Economics letters |
container_volume | 169 |
creator | Caraiani, Petre Călin, Adrian Cantemir |
description | We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points.
•We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2098782292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176518301873</els_id><sourcerecordid>2098782292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfmybrRaT4BQVB6jlssrOadrupSVqpv96U9u5pLs-8M--D0DUlJSV0crsowfqhh1QyQlVJRElodYJGVEleSC6rUzTKnCionIhzdBHjghDKailGyM6_AEPXgU0R-w6v_ACpCTu89r2zO-wHHJO3S7xqwhISNhtjeoi4SfgXgse9_4GAjd8M7R1-h62LLrnhE6d97Na1MFi4RGdd00e4Os4x-nh6nE9fitnb8-v0YVbYirBU8Pw8F5YaXquWiramLQViiVI1N6qqpJgYaeWE0cYwacC2PENGMsk7RVnHx-jmkLsO_nsDMemF34Qhn9SM1EoqxmqWKXGgbPAxBuj0Orjcbqcp0XufeqGPPvXepyZCZ5957_6wB7nC1kHQ0bp9vdaFbE-33v2T8AfcGYEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2098782292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Caraiani, Petre ; Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creator><creatorcontrib>Caraiani, Petre ; Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creatorcontrib><description>We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points.
•We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aftermath ; Bayesian analysis ; Bubbles ; Impact analysis ; Monetary policy ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges ; Studies ; VAR</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2018-08, Vol.169, p.55-58</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caraiani, Petre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</title><title>Economics letters</title><description>We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points.
•We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.</description><subject>Aftermath</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bubbles</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>VAR</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfmybrRaT4BQVB6jlssrOadrupSVqpv96U9u5pLs-8M--D0DUlJSV0crsowfqhh1QyQlVJRElodYJGVEleSC6rUzTKnCionIhzdBHjghDKailGyM6_AEPXgU0R-w6v_ACpCTu89r2zO-wHHJO3S7xqwhISNhtjeoi4SfgXgse9_4GAjd8M7R1-h62LLrnhE6d97Na1MFi4RGdd00e4Os4x-nh6nE9fitnb8-v0YVbYirBU8Pw8F5YaXquWiramLQViiVI1N6qqpJgYaeWE0cYwacC2PENGMsk7RVnHx-jmkLsO_nsDMemF34Qhn9SM1EoqxmqWKXGgbPAxBuj0Orjcbqcp0XufeqGPPvXepyZCZ5957_6wB7nC1kHQ0bp9vdaFbE-33v2T8AfcGYEo</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Caraiani, Petre</creator><creator>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</title><author>Caraiani, Petre ; Călin, Adrian Cantemir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aftermath</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bubbles</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>VAR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caraiani, Petre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caraiani, Petre</au><au>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>169</volume><spage>55</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>55-58</pages><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><abstract>We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points.
•We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-1765 |
ispartof | Economics letters, 2018-08, Vol.169, p.55-58 |
issn | 0165-1765 1873-7374 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2098782292 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index |
subjects | Aftermath Bayesian analysis Bubbles Impact analysis Monetary policy Prices Pricing policies Securities markets Stock exchanges Studies VAR |
title | The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20monetary%20policy%20on%20stock%20market%20bubbles%20at%20zero%20lower%20bound:%20Revisiting%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Caraiani,%20Petre&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=169&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=55-58&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2098782292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2098782292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |