Loading…

The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence

We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economics letters 2018-08, Vol.169, p.55-58
Main Authors: Caraiani, Petre, Călin, Adrian Cantemir
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3
container_end_page 58
container_issue
container_start_page 55
container_title Economics letters
container_volume 169
creator Caraiani, Petre
Călin, Adrian Cantemir
description We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points. •We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2098782292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176518301873</els_id><sourcerecordid>2098782292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfmybrRaT4BQVB6jlssrOadrupSVqpv96U9u5pLs-8M--D0DUlJSV0crsowfqhh1QyQlVJRElodYJGVEleSC6rUzTKnCionIhzdBHjghDKailGyM6_AEPXgU0R-w6v_ACpCTu89r2zO-wHHJO3S7xqwhISNhtjeoi4SfgXgse9_4GAjd8M7R1-h62LLrnhE6d97Na1MFi4RGdd00e4Os4x-nh6nE9fitnb8-v0YVbYirBU8Pw8F5YaXquWiramLQViiVI1N6qqpJgYaeWE0cYwacC2PENGMsk7RVnHx-jmkLsO_nsDMemF34Qhn9SM1EoqxmqWKXGgbPAxBuj0Orjcbqcp0XufeqGPPvXepyZCZ5957_6wB7nC1kHQ0bp9vdaFbE-33v2T8AfcGYEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2098782292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Caraiani, Petre ; Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creator><creatorcontrib>Caraiani, Petre ; Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creatorcontrib><description>We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points. •We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aftermath ; Bayesian analysis ; Bubbles ; Impact analysis ; Monetary policy ; Prices ; Pricing policies ; Securities markets ; Stock exchanges ; Studies ; VAR</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2018-08, Vol.169, p.55-58</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caraiani, Petre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</title><title>Economics letters</title><description>We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points. •We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.</description><subject>Aftermath</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bubbles</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Stock exchanges</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>VAR</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_QQh43jUfmybrRaT4BQVB6jlssrOadrupSVqpv96U9u5pLs-8M--D0DUlJSV0crsowfqhh1QyQlVJRElodYJGVEleSC6rUzTKnCionIhzdBHjghDKailGyM6_AEPXgU0R-w6v_ACpCTu89r2zO-wHHJO3S7xqwhISNhtjeoi4SfgXgse9_4GAjd8M7R1-h62LLrnhE6d97Na1MFi4RGdd00e4Os4x-nh6nE9fitnb8-v0YVbYirBU8Pw8F5YaXquWiramLQViiVI1N6qqpJgYaeWE0cYwacC2PENGMsk7RVnHx-jmkLsO_nsDMemF34Qhn9SM1EoqxmqWKXGgbPAxBuj0Orjcbqcp0XufeqGPPvXepyZCZ5957_6wB7nC1kHQ0bp9vdaFbE-33v2T8AfcGYEo</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Caraiani, Petre</creator><creator>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</title><author>Caraiani, Petre ; Călin, Adrian Cantemir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aftermath</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bubbles</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Stock exchanges</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>VAR</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caraiani, Petre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caraiani, Petre</au><au>Călin, Adrian Cantemir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>169</volume><spage>55</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>55-58</pages><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><abstract>We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) by reestimating their time-varying Bayesian VAR model including the shadow rate of Wu and Xia (2016). We found some significant differences when looking at the results during and in the aftermath of the crisis: with the shadow rate, the impact of monetary policy shocks on asset prices becomes negative. There is also a much lower positive impact of monetary policy shocks on bubbles when using the shadow rate. The impact is lower by almost three percentage points. •We revisit the results in Gali and Gambetta (2015) using the shadow rate for an alternative estimation.•In the alternative estimation, the response of asset to monetary policy shocks becomes negative.•Bubbles respond positively, but the response is significantly lower as compared to the baseline estimation using the federal funds rate.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1765
ispartof Economics letters, 2018-08, Vol.169, p.55-58
issn 0165-1765
1873-7374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2098782292
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index
subjects Aftermath
Bayesian analysis
Bubbles
Impact analysis
Monetary policy
Prices
Pricing policies
Securities markets
Stock exchanges
Studies
VAR
title The effects of monetary policy on stock market bubbles at zero lower bound: Revisiting the evidence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20monetary%20policy%20on%20stock%20market%20bubbles%20at%20zero%20lower%20bound:%20Revisiting%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Caraiani,%20Petre&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=169&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=55-58&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2098782292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-301835c1b398d15d91d1e0c08893b844756b7c7621ab27becd35d9b7273f812f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2098782292&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true