The process of sustainability reporting in international hotel groups: an analysis of stakeholder inclusiveness, materiality and responsiveness

While extensive research covers the disclosure of performance in sustainability reports, there is limited understanding of the process of how such reports are developed and whose priorities they reflect. We investigate the sustainability reporting, focusing on stakeholder-related practices disclosed...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sustainable tourism 2018-07, Vol.26 (7), p.1063-1084
Main Authors: Guix, Mireia, Bonilla-Priego, Maria Jesús, Font, Xavier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accountability
Decision making
hospitality industry
materiality analysis
stakeholder engagement
Stakeholder theory
Stakeholders
Sustainability
Sustainability reporting
Transparency
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:While extensive research covers the disclosure of performance in sustainability reports, there is limited understanding of the process of how such reports are developed and whose priorities they reflect. We investigate the sustainability reporting, focusing on stakeholder-related practices disclosed by the 50 largest hotel groups worldwide, by testing the AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard. We use the three interrelated dimensions (inclusiveness, materiality and responsiveness) to assess the disclosure of how organisations (1) identify and engage with stakeholders, (2) determine the importance of sustainability issues, and (3) respond to stakeholder concerns. We find the low transparency and imprecision of decision-making criteria and processes suggest sustainability reporting is more of a legitimisation exercise than one of accountability. We find the stakeholder identification approach does not inform the organisation's transparency, whereas the dialogue mechanisms used to empower stakeholders, as their participatory role in decision-making and the reporting process, shape the disclosure of materiality and responsiveness. We demonstrate how that the ability to determine stakeholder engagement, materiality analysis and responsiveness of the sustainability reporting process can improve the role of sustainability reports as a mechanism for accountability, and we argue the importance of the alignment between the degree of disclosure on inclusiveness, materiality and responsiveness.
ISSN:0966-9582
1747-7646
DOI:10.1080/09669582.2017.1410164