Loading…
Critical Next Steps in Combating Herbicide Resistance: Our View
The Herbicide Resistance Education Committee of the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA), with the help of local weed scientists and professional facilitators, held listening sessions in seven agricultural regions in 2016 to 2017 to gather information from invited participants in an effort to unde...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed science 2018-09, Vol.66 (5), p.559-561 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b392t-417f02b18edf33c73306ada64d55a24944a0dc87935eebfe24145541bebc43c03 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 561 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 559 |
container_title | Weed science |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Shaw, David R Barrett, Michael Schroeder, Jill Asmus, Amy B Ervin, David Jussaume, Raymond A Coble, Harold |
description | The Herbicide Resistance Education Committee of the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA), with the help of local weed scientists and professional facilitators, held listening sessions in seven agricultural regions in 2016 to 2017 to gather information from invited participants in an effort to understand the grassroots concerns and challenges of these stakeholders, including cropping systems, environmental conditions, and economic, social, and regulatory constraints. Participants: 1. wanted new herbicides, especially those with new mechanisms of action (MOAs); 2. believed there is no need for more government regulation of herbicides; 3. stated that crop rotation options, as well as diverse integrated weed management options, are necessary for herbicide resistance management (HRM), but achieving such diversity in weed management and cropping systems is difficult at best; 4. said that the current agricultural economy makes it difficult to implement best management practices; and 5. were aware of HR but were managing it and were panicking. Awareness of the Challenge First, it is widely recognized within the weed science community that any new herbicide is, at best, a number of years away. [...]we must initiate a clearly articulated national educational effort to explain the scientific, economic, and regulatory challenges to discovery of a new herbicide, as well as the length of time it takes to bring a new discovery to the market. The spread of HR has demonstrated that the concerns expressed in the listening sessions about probable movement of resistance from others, both neighbors and those farther away, are quite valid. Since this is the case, it is critical that we start a discussion now on how we can create various forms of community-based cooperative efforts to limit this spread. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wsc.2018.42 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2101829965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_wsc_2018_42</cupid><jstor_id>26505878</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26505878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b392t-417f02b18edf33c73306ada64d55a24944a0dc87935eebfe24145541bebc43c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsr10LAlcjUPOfhRmRQKxQLvrYhydwpKe1MTVKq_94pU3Qjru7ifHyHexA6pWRECc2uNsGOGKH5SLA9NKBSkoRlsthHA0IET2gm5CE6CmFOCE0ZLQbopvQuOqsX-Ak-I36JsArYNbhsl0ZH18zwGLxx1lWAnyG4EHVj4RpP1x6_O9gco4NaLwKc7O4Qvd3fvZbjZDJ9eCxvJ4nhBYuJoFlNmKE5VDXnNuOcpLrSqaik1EwUQmhS2TwruAQwNTBBhZSCGjBWcEv4EJ333pVvP9YQopq3a990lYp1r-esKFLZUZc9ZX0bgodarbxbav-lKFHbhVS3kNoupATr6LOenofY-h-UpZLIPMu7PNnZ9NJ4V83gt_Rv30XPG9e2Dfzb_Q2bln2G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2101829965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Critical Next Steps in Combating Herbicide Resistance: Our View</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Shaw, David R ; Barrett, Michael ; Schroeder, Jill ; Asmus, Amy B ; Ervin, David ; Jussaume, Raymond A ; Coble, Harold</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R ; Barrett, Michael ; Schroeder, Jill ; Asmus, Amy B ; Ervin, David ; Jussaume, Raymond A ; Coble, Harold</creatorcontrib><description>The Herbicide Resistance Education Committee of the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA), with the help of local weed scientists and professional facilitators, held listening sessions in seven agricultural regions in 2016 to 2017 to gather information from invited participants in an effort to understand the grassroots concerns and challenges of these stakeholders, including cropping systems, environmental conditions, and economic, social, and regulatory constraints. Participants: 1. wanted new herbicides, especially those with new mechanisms of action (MOAs); 2. believed there is no need for more government regulation of herbicides; 3. stated that crop rotation options, as well as diverse integrated weed management options, are necessary for herbicide resistance management (HRM), but achieving such diversity in weed management and cropping systems is difficult at best; 4. said that the current agricultural economy makes it difficult to implement best management practices; and 5. were aware of HR but were managing it and were panicking. Awareness of the Challenge First, it is widely recognized within the weed science community that any new herbicide is, at best, a number of years away. [...]we must initiate a clearly articulated national educational effort to explain the scientific, economic, and regulatory challenges to discovery of a new herbicide, as well as the length of time it takes to bring a new discovery to the market. The spread of HR has demonstrated that the concerns expressed in the listening sessions about probable movement of resistance from others, both neighbors and those farther away, are quite valid. Since this is the case, it is critical that we start a discussion now on how we can create various forms of community-based cooperative efforts to limit this spread.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2018.42</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Economics ; Education ; Educational materials ; Environmental conditions ; Government regulations ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Listening ; MY VIEW ; Public policy ; Registration ; Regulation ; Regulatory agencies ; Science ; Scientists ; Seasons ; Stakeholders ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2018-09, Vol.66 (5), p.559-561</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b392t-417f02b18edf33c73306ada64d55a24944a0dc87935eebfe24145541bebc43c03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26505878$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0043174518000425/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asmus, Amy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jussaume, Raymond A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coble, Harold</creatorcontrib><title>Critical Next Steps in Combating Herbicide Resistance: Our View</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><description>The Herbicide Resistance Education Committee of the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA), with the help of local weed scientists and professional facilitators, held listening sessions in seven agricultural regions in 2016 to 2017 to gather information from invited participants in an effort to understand the grassroots concerns and challenges of these stakeholders, including cropping systems, environmental conditions, and economic, social, and regulatory constraints. Participants: 1. wanted new herbicides, especially those with new mechanisms of action (MOAs); 2. believed there is no need for more government regulation of herbicides; 3. stated that crop rotation options, as well as diverse integrated weed management options, are necessary for herbicide resistance management (HRM), but achieving such diversity in weed management and cropping systems is difficult at best; 4. said that the current agricultural economy makes it difficult to implement best management practices; and 5. were aware of HR but were managing it and were panicking. Awareness of the Challenge First, it is widely recognized within the weed science community that any new herbicide is, at best, a number of years away. [...]we must initiate a clearly articulated national educational effort to explain the scientific, economic, and regulatory challenges to discovery of a new herbicide, as well as the length of time it takes to bring a new discovery to the market. The spread of HR has demonstrated that the concerns expressed in the listening sessions about probable movement of resistance from others, both neighbors and those farther away, are quite valid. Since this is the case, it is critical that we start a discussion now on how we can create various forms of community-based cooperative efforts to limit this spread.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational materials</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Government regulations</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Listening</subject><subject>MY VIEW</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKsr10LAlcjUPOfhRmRQKxQLvrYhydwpKe1MTVKq_94pU3Qjru7ifHyHexA6pWRECc2uNsGOGKH5SLA9NKBSkoRlsthHA0IET2gm5CE6CmFOCE0ZLQbopvQuOqsX-Ak-I36JsArYNbhsl0ZH18zwGLxx1lWAnyG4EHVj4RpP1x6_O9gco4NaLwKc7O4Qvd3fvZbjZDJ9eCxvJ4nhBYuJoFlNmKE5VDXnNuOcpLrSqaik1EwUQmhS2TwruAQwNTBBhZSCGjBWcEv4EJ333pVvP9YQopq3a990lYp1r-esKFLZUZc9ZX0bgodarbxbav-lKFHbhVS3kNoupATr6LOenofY-h-UpZLIPMu7PNnZ9NJ4V83gt_Rv30XPG9e2Dfzb_Q2bln2G</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Shaw, David R</creator><creator>Barrett, Michael</creator><creator>Schroeder, Jill</creator><creator>Asmus, Amy B</creator><creator>Ervin, David</creator><creator>Jussaume, Raymond A</creator><creator>Coble, Harold</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Critical Next Steps in Combating Herbicide Resistance: Our View</title><author>Shaw, David R ; Barrett, Michael ; Schroeder, Jill ; Asmus, Amy B ; Ervin, David ; Jussaume, Raymond A ; Coble, Harold</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b392t-417f02b18edf33c73306ada64d55a24944a0dc87935eebfe24145541bebc43c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational materials</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Government regulations</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Listening</topic><topic>MY VIEW</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaw, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrett, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asmus, Amy B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ervin, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jussaume, Raymond A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coble, Harold</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaw, David R</au><au>Barrett, Michael</au><au>Schroeder, Jill</au><au>Asmus, Amy B</au><au>Ervin, David</au><au>Jussaume, Raymond A</au><au>Coble, Harold</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Critical Next Steps in Combating Herbicide Resistance: Our View</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>559</spage><epage>561</epage><pages>559-561</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>The Herbicide Resistance Education Committee of the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA), with the help of local weed scientists and professional facilitators, held listening sessions in seven agricultural regions in 2016 to 2017 to gather information from invited participants in an effort to understand the grassroots concerns and challenges of these stakeholders, including cropping systems, environmental conditions, and economic, social, and regulatory constraints. Participants: 1. wanted new herbicides, especially those with new mechanisms of action (MOAs); 2. believed there is no need for more government regulation of herbicides; 3. stated that crop rotation options, as well as diverse integrated weed management options, are necessary for herbicide resistance management (HRM), but achieving such diversity in weed management and cropping systems is difficult at best; 4. said that the current agricultural economy makes it difficult to implement best management practices; and 5. were aware of HR but were managing it and were panicking. Awareness of the Challenge First, it is widely recognized within the weed science community that any new herbicide is, at best, a number of years away. [...]we must initiate a clearly articulated national educational effort to explain the scientific, economic, and regulatory challenges to discovery of a new herbicide, as well as the length of time it takes to bring a new discovery to the market. The spread of HR has demonstrated that the concerns expressed in the listening sessions about probable movement of resistance from others, both neighbors and those farther away, are quite valid. Since this is the case, it is critical that we start a discussion now on how we can create various forms of community-based cooperative efforts to limit this spread.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/wsc.2018.42</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
ispartof | Weed science, 2018-09, Vol.66 (5), p.559-561 |
issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 1550-2759 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2101829965 |
source | Cambridge University Press; JSTOR |
subjects | Agricultural practices Crop rotation Cropping systems Economics Education Educational materials Environmental conditions Government regulations Herbicide resistance Herbicides Listening MY VIEW Public policy Registration Regulation Regulatory agencies Science Scientists Seasons Stakeholders Weed control Weeds |
title | Critical Next Steps in Combating Herbicide Resistance: Our View |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A48%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Critical%20Next%20Steps%20in%20Combating%20Herbicide%20Resistance:%20Our%20View&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Shaw,%20David%20R&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=559&rft.epage=561&rft.pages=559-561&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wsc.2018.42&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26505878%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b392t-417f02b18edf33c73306ada64d55a24944a0dc87935eebfe24145541bebc43c03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2101829965&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_wsc_2018_42&rft_jstor_id=26505878&rfr_iscdi=true |