Sex Differences in the Olfactory System: a Functional MRI Study

• Published in: Chemosensory perception 2019-04, Vol.12 (1), p.50-58
• Main Authors: Melero, Helena, Borromeo, Susana, Cristobal-Huerta, Alexandra, Manzanedo, Eva, Luna, Guillermo, Toledano, Adolfo, Hernández-Tamames, Juan Antonio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aroma; Butanol; Chemical stimuli; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Clinical Nutrition; Cortex (frontal); Females; Food Science; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Gender differences; Hemispheric laterality; Hypothalamus; Males; Mental disorders; Neurosciences; Odor; Odors; Olfaction; Olfactory perception; Olfactory system; Psychosis; Rehabilitation; Sensory evaluation; Sensory integration; Sex differences; Smell; Somatosensory cortex; Temporal cortex; Variance analysis; Women
• ISSN: 1936-5802; 1936-5810
• DOI: 10.1007/s12078-018-9250-1

Introduction Olfactory dysfunction is an early marker of neurological disease and a common symptom in psychotic disorders. Previous anatomical and functional research suggests that sex effects may be crucial in the assessment of the olfactory system. Nonetheless, the neural mechanisms through which the factor sex impacts olfactory perception are still not well understood. In this context, we use fMRI to investigate sex differences in the passive processing of chemical stimuli, in order to obtain new neuroscientific data that may help improve the assessment of odor perception. Methods Thirty healthy subjects (17 women) were stimulated with mint and butanol (event-related design) in a 3.0-T MRI scanner. A one-sample t test analysis was performed in order to observe olfactory-related activations. Intergroup differences (women vs. men) and the influence of each aroma were analyzed using a 2 × 2 ANOVA and post hoc contrasts. Results Men and women showed differential activity (males > females) in right superior/middle temporal areas, the right inferior frontal cortex, and the hypothalamus. Both groups showed a predominance of the right hemisphere for the processing of odors. Conclusion Functional differences between women and men in olfaction are not restricted to specific sensory areas and reflect a more general sex-dependent effect in multisensory integration processes. Implications Considering sex differences is essential in order to develop more specific and efficient strategies for the assessment and rehabilitation of the olfactory system and for the interpretation of the olfactory loss as an early biomarker of neurological and psychiatric diseases.