Loading…

Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival

Nest survival is determined in part by a combination of large-scale environmental factors and local nest-site characteristics. Because predation is the primary cause of nest failure, those drivers likely operate by influencing predator abundance, behavior, and/or nest detectability. For example, flu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Auk 2018-07, Vol.135 (3), p.486-494
Main Authors: Ringelman, Kevin M, Walker, Johann, Ringelman, James K, Stephens, Scott E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953
container_end_page 494
container_issue 3
container_start_page 486
container_title The Auk
container_volume 135
creator Ringelman, Kevin M
Walker, Johann
Ringelman, James K
Stephens, Scott E
description Nest survival is determined in part by a combination of large-scale environmental factors and local nest-site characteristics. Because predation is the primary cause of nest failure, those drivers likely operate by influencing predator abundance, behavior, and/or nest detectability. For example, fluctuations in landscape productivity have the potential to alter predator and prey abundance, whereas nest vegetation and patterns of nest spacing may influence predator behavior. We used 8 yr of site-specific environmental data coupled with data collected from 11,547 duck nests to evaluate the relative importance of large-scale and local factors on nest survival. We found that higher values of gross primary productivity, basins, and pond counts were associated with higher nest survival in a given year, but were associated with lower nest survival the following 2 yr. Taken in combination with the literature, our interpretation is that productive environmental conditions can result in time-lagged increases in predator abundance, leading to higher levels of nest predation in subsequent years. Local factors were generally less important than large-scale covariates in determining duck nest survival, but we found that nests laid earlier, in thicker vegetation, and with closer nearest neighbors had higher survival rates. However, as the season progressed, nests with closer nearest neighbors had lower survival rates (significant initiation date*distance interaction), suggesting predators may eventually aggregate in areas of higher nest density. Our results highlight the importance of both large-scale and local factors as they affect duck nest survival, and suggest several hypotheses about predator numerical and aggregative responses that are ripe for empirical testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1642/AUK-17-207.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2104955371</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90023465</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90023465</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7evAoFb2LWyUeb9rgsrooLXnbPIW1SyNo2NWkL_vdmqXj0NLyZH-8ND6FbAiuScfq0PrxjIjAFsSJnaEEKlmNOU36OFgDAcQ4sv0RXIRyjTCEvFmi7N23vvGoS1emkHZvB4tCrwcaN6SbrXdeabohKezsZHxJXJ3qsPpPOhCEJo5_spJprdFGrJpib37lEh-3zfvOKdx8vb5v1DpeMwoC5MUIXSuR5DK9ZTZmGLKtExogx2hSKsVqRMgWhSiBMU5IqUALK3FQsK1K2RPezb-_d1xg_kEc3-i5GSkqAF2nKBInU40xV3oXgTS17b1vlvyUBeWpKxqYkETI2JU_43Ywfw-D8H1sAUMazU-jDfC-tc5353-wHRYNyYQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2104955371</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Ringelman, Kevin M ; Walker, Johann ; Ringelman, James K ; Stephens, Scott E</creator><creatorcontrib>Ringelman, Kevin M ; Walker, Johann ; Ringelman, James K ; Stephens, Scott E</creatorcontrib><description>Nest survival is determined in part by a combination of large-scale environmental factors and local nest-site characteristics. Because predation is the primary cause of nest failure, those drivers likely operate by influencing predator abundance, behavior, and/or nest detectability. For example, fluctuations in landscape productivity have the potential to alter predator and prey abundance, whereas nest vegetation and patterns of nest spacing may influence predator behavior. We used 8 yr of site-specific environmental data coupled with data collected from 11,547 duck nests to evaluate the relative importance of large-scale and local factors on nest survival. We found that higher values of gross primary productivity, basins, and pond counts were associated with higher nest survival in a given year, but were associated with lower nest survival the following 2 yr. Taken in combination with the literature, our interpretation is that productive environmental conditions can result in time-lagged increases in predator abundance, leading to higher levels of nest predation in subsequent years. Local factors were generally less important than large-scale covariates in determining duck nest survival, but we found that nests laid earlier, in thicker vegetation, and with closer nearest neighbors had higher survival rates. However, as the season progressed, nests with closer nearest neighbors had lower survival rates (significant initiation date*distance interaction), suggesting predators may eventually aggregate in areas of higher nest density. Our results highlight the importance of both large-scale and local factors as they affect duck nest survival, and suggest several hypotheses about predator numerical and aggregative responses that are ripe for empirical testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1642/AUK-17-207.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco: The American Ornithologists' Union</publisher><subject>Abundance ; aggregative response ; Aquatic birds ; Basins ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental factors ; functional response ; Interspecific relationships ; nearest neighbor ; nest survival ; Nests ; numerical response ; prairie pothole region ; Predation ; Predators ; Prey ; Primary production ; REPRODUCTIVE AND BREEDING BIOLOGY ; Spatial analysis ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; time-lagged ; Variation ; Vegetation ; Waterfowl ; Wildfowl</subject><ispartof>The Auk, 2018-07, Vol.135 (3), p.486-494</ispartof><rights>2018 American Ornithological Society.</rights><rights>2018 American Ornithological Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithological Society Jul 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90023465$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90023465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ringelman, Kevin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringelman, James K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Scott E</creatorcontrib><title>Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival</title><title>The Auk</title><description>Nest survival is determined in part by a combination of large-scale environmental factors and local nest-site characteristics. Because predation is the primary cause of nest failure, those drivers likely operate by influencing predator abundance, behavior, and/or nest detectability. For example, fluctuations in landscape productivity have the potential to alter predator and prey abundance, whereas nest vegetation and patterns of nest spacing may influence predator behavior. We used 8 yr of site-specific environmental data coupled with data collected from 11,547 duck nests to evaluate the relative importance of large-scale and local factors on nest survival. We found that higher values of gross primary productivity, basins, and pond counts were associated with higher nest survival in a given year, but were associated with lower nest survival the following 2 yr. Taken in combination with the literature, our interpretation is that productive environmental conditions can result in time-lagged increases in predator abundance, leading to higher levels of nest predation in subsequent years. Local factors were generally less important than large-scale covariates in determining duck nest survival, but we found that nests laid earlier, in thicker vegetation, and with closer nearest neighbors had higher survival rates. However, as the season progressed, nests with closer nearest neighbors had lower survival rates (significant initiation date*distance interaction), suggesting predators may eventually aggregate in areas of higher nest density. Our results highlight the importance of both large-scale and local factors as they affect duck nest survival, and suggest several hypotheses about predator numerical and aggregative responses that are ripe for empirical testing.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>aggregative response</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental factors</subject><subject>functional response</subject><subject>Interspecific relationships</subject><subject>nearest neighbor</subject><subject>nest survival</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>numerical response</subject><subject>prairie pothole region</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>REPRODUCTIVE AND BREEDING BIOLOGY</subject><subject>Spatial analysis</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>time-lagged</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>2732-4613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7evAoFb2LWyUeb9rgsrooLXnbPIW1SyNo2NWkL_vdmqXj0NLyZH-8ND6FbAiuScfq0PrxjIjAFsSJnaEEKlmNOU36OFgDAcQ4sv0RXIRyjTCEvFmi7N23vvGoS1emkHZvB4tCrwcaN6SbrXdeabohKezsZHxJXJ3qsPpPOhCEJo5_spJprdFGrJpib37lEh-3zfvOKdx8vb5v1DpeMwoC5MUIXSuR5DK9ZTZmGLKtExogx2hSKsVqRMgWhSiBMU5IqUALK3FQsK1K2RPezb-_d1xg_kEc3-i5GSkqAF2nKBInU40xV3oXgTS17b1vlvyUBeWpKxqYkETI2JU_43Ywfw-D8H1sAUMazU-jDfC-tc5353-wHRYNyYQ</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Ringelman, Kevin M</creator><creator>Walker, Johann</creator><creator>Ringelman, James K</creator><creator>Stephens, Scott E</creator><general>The American Ornithologists' Union</general><general>American Ornithologists’ Union</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival</title><author>Ringelman, Kevin M ; Walker, Johann ; Ringelman, James K ; Stephens, Scott E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>aggregative response</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental factors</topic><topic>functional response</topic><topic>Interspecific relationships</topic><topic>nearest neighbor</topic><topic>nest survival</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>numerical response</topic><topic>prairie pothole region</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>REPRODUCTIVE AND BREEDING BIOLOGY</topic><topic>Spatial analysis</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>time-lagged</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ringelman, Kevin M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ringelman, James K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Scott E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ringelman, Kevin M</au><au>Walker, Johann</au><au>Ringelman, James K</au><au>Stephens, Scott E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival</atitle><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>486</spage><epage>494</epage><pages>486-494</pages><issn>0004-8038</issn><eissn>1938-4254</eissn><eissn>2732-4613</eissn><abstract>Nest survival is determined in part by a combination of large-scale environmental factors and local nest-site characteristics. Because predation is the primary cause of nest failure, those drivers likely operate by influencing predator abundance, behavior, and/or nest detectability. For example, fluctuations in landscape productivity have the potential to alter predator and prey abundance, whereas nest vegetation and patterns of nest spacing may influence predator behavior. We used 8 yr of site-specific environmental data coupled with data collected from 11,547 duck nests to evaluate the relative importance of large-scale and local factors on nest survival. We found that higher values of gross primary productivity, basins, and pond counts were associated with higher nest survival in a given year, but were associated with lower nest survival the following 2 yr. Taken in combination with the literature, our interpretation is that productive environmental conditions can result in time-lagged increases in predator abundance, leading to higher levels of nest predation in subsequent years. Local factors were generally less important than large-scale covariates in determining duck nest survival, but we found that nests laid earlier, in thicker vegetation, and with closer nearest neighbors had higher survival rates. However, as the season progressed, nests with closer nearest neighbors had lower survival rates (significant initiation date*distance interaction), suggesting predators may eventually aggregate in areas of higher nest density. Our results highlight the importance of both large-scale and local factors as they affect duck nest survival, and suggest several hypotheses about predator numerical and aggregative responses that are ripe for empirical testing.</abstract><cop>Waco</cop><pub>The American Ornithologists' Union</pub><doi>10.1642/AUK-17-207.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8038
ispartof The Auk, 2018-07, Vol.135 (3), p.486-494
issn 0004-8038
1938-4254
2732-4613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2104955371
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Abundance
aggregative response
Aquatic birds
Basins
Environmental conditions
Environmental factors
functional response
Interspecific relationships
nearest neighbor
nest survival
Nests
numerical response
prairie pothole region
Predation
Predators
Prey
Primary production
REPRODUCTIVE AND BREEDING BIOLOGY
Spatial analysis
Survival
Survival analysis
time-lagged
Variation
Vegetation
Waterfowl
Wildfowl
title Temporal and multi-spatial environmental drivers of duck nest survival
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A30%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temporal%20and%20multi-spatial%20environmental%20drivers%20of%20duck%20nest%20survival&rft.jtitle=The%20Auk&rft.au=Ringelman,%20Kevin%20M&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=486&rft.epage=494&rft.pages=486-494&rft.issn=0004-8038&rft.eissn=1938-4254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1642/AUK-17-207.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E90023465%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b320t-4ee7d9a788089f3f23d066c7631eede9a33fa1b507ab013d215a0a70b8ec36953%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2104955371&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90023465&rfr_iscdi=true