Loading…
Potential Politics and the Primacy of Preemption
Because of this, preventive measures are not self-sustaining. If it did, its ability to respond with an immediacy proportional to the imminence of the threat would be compromised. Because it operates in a closed loop, its epistemology is univocal (centered on a single certainty) and its ontology is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Theory & event 2007-04, Vol.10 (2), p.N_A |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Because of this, preventive measures are not self-sustaining. If it did, its ability to respond with an immediacy proportional to the imminence of the threat would be compromised. Because it operates in a closed loop, its epistemology is univocal (centered on a single certainty) and its ontology is monolithic (both sides are taken up in a single global movement). Preemption is an effective operative logic rather than a causal operative logic. Since its ground is potential, there is no actual cause for it to organize itself around. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1092-311X 2572-6633 1092-311X |
DOI: | 10.1353/tae.2007.0066 |