Loading…

Calibrating the factors of management quality in banking performance: a mixed method approach

Purpose This paper aims to explore and model the factors of management quality dimension (FMQD) in evaluating banking performance. Design/methodology/approach The FMQD in evaluating banking performance are explored through the review of literature. The identified factors are modeled using integrated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Measuring business excellence 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.242-257
Main Authors: Chatterjee, Debmallya, Dhaigude, Amol S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23
container_end_page 257
container_issue 3
container_start_page 242
container_title Measuring business excellence
container_volume 22
creator Chatterjee, Debmallya
Dhaigude, Amol S
description Purpose This paper aims to explore and model the factors of management quality dimension (FMQD) in evaluating banking performance. Design/methodology/approach The FMQD in evaluating banking performance are explored through the review of literature. The identified factors are modeled using integrated fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) and Matrices’ Impacts Croise’s Multiplication Appliquée a UN Classement (MICMAC) approach. Scenario analysis is carried out on the proposed model to study the behavior in a dynamic setting. Findings The main finding of this study is the prioritization of FMQD in evaluating banking performance. The cohesive model obtained by FCM-MICMAC integrated approach demonstrates that the interlinked factors can be grouped into independent, autonomous, dependent and relay clusters. The results suggest that internal control system is the most influential factor, whereas the business per employee is the most sensitive one in modeling management quality. Research limitations/implications This study models the FMQD through expert opinions, and hence, individual bias may influence the results. This study can be further validated through statistical analysis. Practical implications The study suggests that practitioners may focus more on these select factors and their mutual interactions to enhance management quality for improving the performance of the banks. The study emphasizes that better clarity and efficient designing of internal processes are the key to management soundness. Originality/value This is the first study to explore and model FMQD in banking performance using FCM-MICMAC approach. Validation of the proposed model in a dynamic setting is also relatively new in the banking performance literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/MBE-08-2017-0052
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108111504</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108111504</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwM1piNr2L6zhhg6p8SEUsMCLr4thtSpO0TirRf4-jsiCx3HvD895JD2PXCLeIkE1eH-YCMpEAagGgkhM2Qq0ykYHSp3GXaSYkTPU5u-i6NQCmKtUj9jmjTVUE6qtmyfuV455s34aOt57X1NDS1a7p-W4fsf7Aq4YX1HwN8NYF34bIWHfHidfVtyt57fpVW3LabkNLdnXJzjxtOnf1m2P28Th_nz2LxdvTy-x-IaxE7IXUGRapjANypSHHXNsp2Rwwz1zhNalSyhTBZdJLopzKgrTNyTuFElwix-zmeDe-3e1d15t1uw9NfGmSKAcRFUwjBUfKhrbrgvNmG6qawsEgmEGiiRJNjEGiGSTGyuRYiRoCbcr_Gn-0yx9oWXKn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108111504</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Calibrating the factors of management quality in banking performance: a mixed method approach</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Chatterjee, Debmallya ; Dhaigude, Amol S</creator><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Debmallya ; Dhaigude, Amol S</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This paper aims to explore and model the factors of management quality dimension (FMQD) in evaluating banking performance. Design/methodology/approach The FMQD in evaluating banking performance are explored through the review of literature. The identified factors are modeled using integrated fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) and Matrices’ Impacts Croise’s Multiplication Appliquée a UN Classement (MICMAC) approach. Scenario analysis is carried out on the proposed model to study the behavior in a dynamic setting. Findings The main finding of this study is the prioritization of FMQD in evaluating banking performance. The cohesive model obtained by FCM-MICMAC integrated approach demonstrates that the interlinked factors can be grouped into independent, autonomous, dependent and relay clusters. The results suggest that internal control system is the most influential factor, whereas the business per employee is the most sensitive one in modeling management quality. Research limitations/implications This study models the FMQD through expert opinions, and hence, individual bias may influence the results. This study can be further validated through statistical analysis. Practical implications The study suggests that practitioners may focus more on these select factors and their mutual interactions to enhance management quality for improving the performance of the banks. The study emphasizes that better clarity and efficient designing of internal processes are the key to management soundness. Originality/value This is the first study to explore and model FMQD in banking performance using FCM-MICMAC approach. Validation of the proposed model in a dynamic setting is also relatively new in the banking performance literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-3047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8057</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/MBE-08-2017-0052</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Asset liability management ; Banking ; Banking industry ; Banks ; Camelids ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Economic development ; Expenditures ; Financial institutions ; Information technology ; Liquidity ; Literature reviews ; Mixed methods research ; Money laundering ; Performance evaluation ; Profits ; Quality ; Ratings &amp; rankings ; Researchers</subject><ispartof>Measuring business excellence, 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.242-257</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108111504/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108111504?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74767</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Debmallya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaigude, Amol S</creatorcontrib><title>Calibrating the factors of management quality in banking performance: a mixed method approach</title><title>Measuring business excellence</title><description>Purpose This paper aims to explore and model the factors of management quality dimension (FMQD) in evaluating banking performance. Design/methodology/approach The FMQD in evaluating banking performance are explored through the review of literature. The identified factors are modeled using integrated fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) and Matrices’ Impacts Croise’s Multiplication Appliquée a UN Classement (MICMAC) approach. Scenario analysis is carried out on the proposed model to study the behavior in a dynamic setting. Findings The main finding of this study is the prioritization of FMQD in evaluating banking performance. The cohesive model obtained by FCM-MICMAC integrated approach demonstrates that the interlinked factors can be grouped into independent, autonomous, dependent and relay clusters. The results suggest that internal control system is the most influential factor, whereas the business per employee is the most sensitive one in modeling management quality. Research limitations/implications This study models the FMQD through expert opinions, and hence, individual bias may influence the results. This study can be further validated through statistical analysis. Practical implications The study suggests that practitioners may focus more on these select factors and their mutual interactions to enhance management quality for improving the performance of the banks. The study emphasizes that better clarity and efficient designing of internal processes are the key to management soundness. Originality/value This is the first study to explore and model FMQD in banking performance using FCM-MICMAC approach. Validation of the proposed model in a dynamic setting is also relatively new in the banking performance literature.</description><subject>Asset liability management</subject><subject>Banking</subject><subject>Banking industry</subject><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Camelids</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Financial institutions</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Money laundering</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Profits</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Ratings &amp; rankings</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><issn>1368-3047</issn><issn>1758-8057</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkD1PwzAQhi0EEqWwM1piNr2L6zhhg6p8SEUsMCLr4thtSpO0TirRf4-jsiCx3HvD895JD2PXCLeIkE1eH-YCMpEAagGgkhM2Qq0ykYHSp3GXaSYkTPU5u-i6NQCmKtUj9jmjTVUE6qtmyfuV455s34aOt57X1NDS1a7p-W4fsf7Aq4YX1HwN8NYF34bIWHfHidfVtyt57fpVW3LabkNLdnXJzjxtOnf1m2P28Th_nz2LxdvTy-x-IaxE7IXUGRapjANypSHHXNsp2Rwwz1zhNalSyhTBZdJLopzKgrTNyTuFElwix-zmeDe-3e1d15t1uw9NfGmSKAcRFUwjBUfKhrbrgvNmG6qawsEgmEGiiRJNjEGiGSTGyuRYiRoCbcr_Gn-0yx9oWXKn</recordid><startdate>20180918</startdate><enddate>20180918</enddate><creator>Chatterjee, Debmallya</creator><creator>Dhaigude, Amol S</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180918</creationdate><title>Calibrating the factors of management quality in banking performance: a mixed method approach</title><author>Chatterjee, Debmallya ; Dhaigude, Amol S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asset liability management</topic><topic>Banking</topic><topic>Banking industry</topic><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Camelids</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Financial institutions</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Money laundering</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Profits</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Ratings &amp; rankings</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Debmallya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhaigude, Amol S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Measuring business excellence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chatterjee, Debmallya</au><au>Dhaigude, Amol S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Calibrating the factors of management quality in banking performance: a mixed method approach</atitle><jtitle>Measuring business excellence</jtitle><date>2018-09-18</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>242-257</pages><issn>1368-3047</issn><eissn>1758-8057</eissn><abstract>Purpose This paper aims to explore and model the factors of management quality dimension (FMQD) in evaluating banking performance. Design/methodology/approach The FMQD in evaluating banking performance are explored through the review of literature. The identified factors are modeled using integrated fuzzy cognitive map (FCM) and Matrices’ Impacts Croise’s Multiplication Appliquée a UN Classement (MICMAC) approach. Scenario analysis is carried out on the proposed model to study the behavior in a dynamic setting. Findings The main finding of this study is the prioritization of FMQD in evaluating banking performance. The cohesive model obtained by FCM-MICMAC integrated approach demonstrates that the interlinked factors can be grouped into independent, autonomous, dependent and relay clusters. The results suggest that internal control system is the most influential factor, whereas the business per employee is the most sensitive one in modeling management quality. Research limitations/implications This study models the FMQD through expert opinions, and hence, individual bias may influence the results. This study can be further validated through statistical analysis. Practical implications The study suggests that practitioners may focus more on these select factors and their mutual interactions to enhance management quality for improving the performance of the banks. The study emphasizes that better clarity and efficient designing of internal processes are the key to management soundness. Originality/value This is the first study to explore and model FMQD in banking performance using FCM-MICMAC approach. Validation of the proposed model in a dynamic setting is also relatively new in the banking performance literature.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/MBE-08-2017-0052</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-3047
ispartof Measuring business excellence, 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.242-257
issn 1368-3047
1758-8057
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2108111504
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)
subjects Asset liability management
Banking
Banking industry
Banks
Camelids
Data envelopment analysis
Decision making
Economic development
Expenditures
Financial institutions
Information technology
Liquidity
Literature reviews
Mixed methods research
Money laundering
Performance evaluation
Profits
Quality
Ratings & rankings
Researchers
title Calibrating the factors of management quality in banking performance: a mixed method approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A27%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Calibrating%20the%20factors%20of%20management%20quality%20in%20banking%20performance:%20a%20mixed%20method%20approach&rft.jtitle=Measuring%20business%20excellence&rft.au=Chatterjee,%20Debmallya&rft.date=2018-09-18&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=242-257&rft.issn=1368-3047&rft.eissn=1758-8057&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/MBE-08-2017-0052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2108111504%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3781b6381b095709197c4ac90198ebf7a5d33610e83f3aa9adba7c9afe5130e23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108111504&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true