The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax

The major political parties support the tenet of the original GST agreement that GST change requires unanimous state approval. However, GST change could differentially affect state economies, and thus influence support from individual states. We investigate the potential for GST change to differenti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Economic record 2018-09, Vol.94 (306), p.255-275
Main Authors: Giesecke, James A., Tran, Nhi H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Changes
Economic structure
GST
Political parties
Regional differences
Regional variations
Taxation
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323
container_end_page 275
container_issue 306
container_start_page 255
container_title The Economic record
container_volume 94
creator Giesecke, James A.
Tran, Nhi H.
description The major political parties support the tenet of the original GST agreement that GST change requires unanimous state approval. However, GST change could differentially affect state economies, and thus influence support from individual states. We investigate the potential for GST change to differentially affect state economies. We do this by developing a multi‐regional model of the Australian economy that contains details of the legislated features of the GST. In this model, when we change any element of the GST, the economic effects are informed by regional differences in economic structure and their interactions with the details of our GST theory.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-4932.12419
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108823119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108823119</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoWKdnrwUPnrrlJWmaHEeZUygO5jyHLE21ozYz2XT7721X8ep3ebzH73t8fAjdAh5DpwmwLE2YpGQMhIE8Q9Hf5RxFGANNMGHyEl2FsMGdiIAIFat3Gz_rXe1a3cS6LeOlfRuW3LXBfu5ta2yIXRVP92HndVPr-xDPnSvDCX-x_qvuiZU-XKOLSjfB3vzOEXp9mK3yx6RYzJ_yaZEYKrFMSi2NXAvDypRnFdGE4CpjxHBGaZoBlHytIS0l1WspOBcmlYYxqq20jAtK6AjdDX-33nUBw05t3N53mYMigIUgFEB21GSgjHcheFupra8_tD8qwKqvTPUFqb4gdaqsc_DB8V039vgfrmb5YjkYfwD9A2vH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108823119</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Giesecke, James A. ; Tran, Nhi H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giesecke, James A. ; Tran, Nhi H.</creatorcontrib><description>The major political parties support the tenet of the original GST agreement that GST change requires unanimous state approval. However, GST change could differentially affect state economies, and thus influence support from individual states. We investigate the potential for GST change to differentially affect state economies. We do this by developing a multi‐regional model of the Australian economy that contains details of the legislated features of the GST. In this model, when we change any element of the GST, the economic effects are informed by regional differences in economic structure and their interactions with the details of our GST theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-0249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-4932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-4932.12419</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Richmond: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Changes ; Economic structure ; GST ; Political parties ; Regional differences ; Regional variations ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>The Economic record, 2018-09, Vol.94 (306), p.255-275</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors. Economic Record published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Economic Society of Australia</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Economic Society of Australia</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7283-0551</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giesecke, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Nhi H.</creatorcontrib><title>The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax</title><title>The Economic record</title><description>The major political parties support the tenet of the original GST agreement that GST change requires unanimous state approval. However, GST change could differentially affect state economies, and thus influence support from individual states. We investigate the potential for GST change to differentially affect state economies. We do this by developing a multi‐regional model of the Australian economy that contains details of the legislated features of the GST. In this model, when we change any element of the GST, the economic effects are informed by regional differences in economic structure and their interactions with the details of our GST theory.</description><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Economic structure</subject><subject>GST</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Regional differences</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0013-0249</issn><issn>1475-4932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFLwzAUxoMoWKdnrwUPnrrlJWmaHEeZUygO5jyHLE21ozYz2XT7721X8ep3ebzH73t8fAjdAh5DpwmwLE2YpGQMhIE8Q9Hf5RxFGANNMGHyEl2FsMGdiIAIFat3Gz_rXe1a3cS6LeOlfRuW3LXBfu5ta2yIXRVP92HndVPr-xDPnSvDCX-x_qvuiZU-XKOLSjfB3vzOEXp9mK3yx6RYzJ_yaZEYKrFMSi2NXAvDypRnFdGE4CpjxHBGaZoBlHytIS0l1WspOBcmlYYxqq20jAtK6AjdDX-33nUBw05t3N53mYMigIUgFEB21GSgjHcheFupra8_tD8qwKqvTPUFqb4gdaqsc_DB8V039vgfrmb5YjkYfwD9A2vH</recordid><startdate>201809</startdate><enddate>201809</enddate><creator>Giesecke, James A.</creator><creator>Tran, Nhi H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7283-0551</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201809</creationdate><title>The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax</title><author>Giesecke, James A. ; Tran, Nhi H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Economic structure</topic><topic>GST</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Regional differences</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giesecke, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tran, Nhi H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Titles (Open access)</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Economic record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giesecke, James A.</au><au>Tran, Nhi H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax</atitle><jtitle>The Economic record</jtitle><date>2018-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>306</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>255-275</pages><issn>0013-0249</issn><eissn>1475-4932</eissn><abstract>The major political parties support the tenet of the original GST agreement that GST change requires unanimous state approval. However, GST change could differentially affect state economies, and thus influence support from individual states. We investigate the potential for GST change to differentially affect state economies. We do this by developing a multi‐regional model of the Australian economy that contains details of the legislated features of the GST. In this model, when we change any element of the GST, the economic effects are informed by regional differences in economic structure and their interactions with the details of our GST theory.</abstract><cop>Richmond</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-4932.12419</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7283-0551</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-0249
ispartof The Economic record, 2018-09, Vol.94 (306), p.255-275
issn 0013-0249
1475-4932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2108823119
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Changes
Economic structure
GST
Political parties
Regional differences
Regional variations
Taxation
title The National and Regional Consequences of Australia's Goods and Services Tax
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A22%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20National%20and%20Regional%20Consequences%20of%20Australia's%20Goods%20and%20Services%20Tax&rft.jtitle=The%20Economic%20record&rft.au=Giesecke,%20James%20A.&rft.date=2018-09&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=306&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=255-275&rft.issn=0013-0249&rft.eissn=1475-4932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-4932.12419&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2108823119%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3909-da9c9b8c4d567f2a220f742c64335711d6ba15d93ab98668c59c443ae9e468323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108823119&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true