Loading…
Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal research design for research on women entrepreneurs involved in negotiating term sheets for private equity capital. This research explores new ways for researchers to connect with such current “invisibles” through the use of a mixed method...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of gender and entrepreneurship 2016-03, Vol.8 (1), p.48-68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393 |
container_end_page | 68 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | International journal of gender and entrepreneurship |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Swartz, Ethné Amatucci, Frances M Coleman, Susan |
description | Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal research design for research on women entrepreneurs involved in negotiating term sheets for private equity capital. This research explores new ways for researchers to connect with such current “invisibles” through the use of a mixed method and mixed mode research design to expand sampling options and secure respondent participation. The authors discuss existing data sets that have been used as secondary sources for data on financing of companies and consider their inadequacy for research questions about process issues in negotiation. The authors present process-related findings regarding the efficacy of the research design.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper reviews research on research methodology, incorporating a discussion of practices outside of the entrepreneurship discipline to discover effective practices for identifying respondents and data not currently captured in entrepreneurship data sources. The respondents were found through social media sites, angel networks, University networks and via identification through a proprietary financial intelligence database.
Findings
– An optimal research design to identify women business owners of growth-oriented firms who have negotiated private equity should consider mixed methods designs and mixed modes, including the use of digital networks that signal to potential respondents that research is being done.
Research limitations/implications
– Although the authors developed the multi-method, mixed mode (MMMM) research design, the sample size is still relatively small. This raises concerns about generalizability to the larger population and limits statistical analysis more suitable with larger data sets. However, the MMMM research design has enabled the authors to reach a difficult target sample. It has proven effective, although a longer time frame would have been helpful.
Research limitations/implications
– All of the large scale databases in entrepreneurship have limitations in providing optimal sampling frames for process-related research. The present research study was able to use conventional networks, social media sites and angel networks to connect with women business owners who have raised private equity, but who lack visibility in current data sets. The study shows that through the use of multiple methods, women entrepreneurs can be researched and some will share their experiences about process issues. The sample size was small and th |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJGE-09-2013-0060 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2108840754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2108840754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscQ7Y8U-SI6oKFFXiQs_GdbZtqsQOtiPat8dRERISl905zMyuPoRuKbmnlJQPi9fneUaqLCeUZYRIcoYmtBAyk3nBz3-1lJfoKoR9clSciAn6WIXGbrHG3dDGpm8BdxB3rsba1rhrDpCmqwHrvvdOmx2ODsNBd40F_OU6sBhs9NB7sDB4bGHrYqPj2BnisYVwjS42ug1w87OnaPU0f5-9ZMu358XscZkZVrGYFesyN6YuCyYLKoGtJdOGmwpKTplgVU6SzCUhIExRC8GlMbmgoqz5WpNUMUV3p9705-cAIaq9G7xNJ1WeAJWcFIInFz25jHcheNio3jed9kdFiRpBqhGkIpUaQaoRZMqQUwY68Lqt_438Yc--AZzJdJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2108840754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Swartz, Ethné ; Amatucci, Frances M ; Coleman, Susan</creator><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ethné ; Amatucci, Frances M ; Coleman, Susan</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal research design for research on women entrepreneurs involved in negotiating term sheets for private equity capital. This research explores new ways for researchers to connect with such current “invisibles” through the use of a mixed method and mixed mode research design to expand sampling options and secure respondent participation. The authors discuss existing data sets that have been used as secondary sources for data on financing of companies and consider their inadequacy for research questions about process issues in negotiation. The authors present process-related findings regarding the efficacy of the research design.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper reviews research on research methodology, incorporating a discussion of practices outside of the entrepreneurship discipline to discover effective practices for identifying respondents and data not currently captured in entrepreneurship data sources. The respondents were found through social media sites, angel networks, University networks and via identification through a proprietary financial intelligence database.
Findings
– An optimal research design to identify women business owners of growth-oriented firms who have negotiated private equity should consider mixed methods designs and mixed modes, including the use of digital networks that signal to potential respondents that research is being done.
Research limitations/implications
– Although the authors developed the multi-method, mixed mode (MMMM) research design, the sample size is still relatively small. This raises concerns about generalizability to the larger population and limits statistical analysis more suitable with larger data sets. However, the MMMM research design has enabled the authors to reach a difficult target sample. It has proven effective, although a longer time frame would have been helpful.
Research limitations/implications
– All of the large scale databases in entrepreneurship have limitations in providing optimal sampling frames for process-related research. The present research study was able to use conventional networks, social media sites and angel networks to connect with women business owners who have raised private equity, but who lack visibility in current data sets. The study shows that through the use of multiple methods, women entrepreneurs can be researched and some will share their experiences about process issues. The sample size was small and the quantitative data cannot be generalized. However, the methodology works and allows researchers to explore experiences that are not captured in existing data sets.
Social implications
– Entrepreneurship researchers can connect with “invisibles” by becoming more “social” and using social media sites that are used by women entrepreneurs. Researchers may not have immediate access to women entrepreneurs through these means, but rather they need to develop interpersonal contacts, build a social presence and trust to recruit respondents to complete online questionnaire studies about substantive topics such as negotiating term sheets for equity investments in their companies.
Originality/value
– This paper summarizes the “research on research methodologies” in entrepreneurship, reviews secondary data sources and discusses their limitations for specific types of research questions. A review of the value of MMMM research designs and best practices in online survey research outside of entrepreneurship provides insights into the incorporation of digital tools in other disciplines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1756-6266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJGE-09-2013-0060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Datasets ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Equity capital ; Equity financing ; Informal economy ; Negotiations ; Polls & surveys ; Qualitative research ; Research design ; Research methodology ; Social networks ; Social research ; Strategy ; Venture capital ; Women ; Women owned businesses</subject><ispartof>International journal of gender and entrepreneurship, 2016-03, Vol.8 (1), p.48-68</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108840754/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2108840754?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11668,27903,27904,36039,44342,74642</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ethné</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amatucci, Frances M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Susan</creatorcontrib><title>Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles</title><title>International journal of gender and entrepreneurship</title><description>Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal research design for research on women entrepreneurs involved in negotiating term sheets for private equity capital. This research explores new ways for researchers to connect with such current “invisibles” through the use of a mixed method and mixed mode research design to expand sampling options and secure respondent participation. The authors discuss existing data sets that have been used as secondary sources for data on financing of companies and consider their inadequacy for research questions about process issues in negotiation. The authors present process-related findings regarding the efficacy of the research design.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper reviews research on research methodology, incorporating a discussion of practices outside of the entrepreneurship discipline to discover effective practices for identifying respondents and data not currently captured in entrepreneurship data sources. The respondents were found through social media sites, angel networks, University networks and via identification through a proprietary financial intelligence database.
Findings
– An optimal research design to identify women business owners of growth-oriented firms who have negotiated private equity should consider mixed methods designs and mixed modes, including the use of digital networks that signal to potential respondents that research is being done.
Research limitations/implications
– Although the authors developed the multi-method, mixed mode (MMMM) research design, the sample size is still relatively small. This raises concerns about generalizability to the larger population and limits statistical analysis more suitable with larger data sets. However, the MMMM research design has enabled the authors to reach a difficult target sample. It has proven effective, although a longer time frame would have been helpful.
Research limitations/implications
– All of the large scale databases in entrepreneurship have limitations in providing optimal sampling frames for process-related research. The present research study was able to use conventional networks, social media sites and angel networks to connect with women business owners who have raised private equity, but who lack visibility in current data sets. The study shows that through the use of multiple methods, women entrepreneurs can be researched and some will share their experiences about process issues. The sample size was small and the quantitative data cannot be generalized. However, the methodology works and allows researchers to explore experiences that are not captured in existing data sets.
Social implications
– Entrepreneurship researchers can connect with “invisibles” by becoming more “social” and using social media sites that are used by women entrepreneurs. Researchers may not have immediate access to women entrepreneurs through these means, but rather they need to develop interpersonal contacts, build a social presence and trust to recruit respondents to complete online questionnaire studies about substantive topics such as negotiating term sheets for equity investments in their companies.
Originality/value
– This paper summarizes the “research on research methodologies” in entrepreneurship, reviews secondary data sources and discusses their limitations for specific types of research questions. A review of the value of MMMM research designs and best practices in online survey research outside of entrepreneurship provides insights into the incorporation of digital tools in other disciplines.</description><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Equity capital</subject><subject>Equity financing</subject><subject>Informal economy</subject><subject>Negotiations</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Venture capital</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Women owned businesses</subject><issn>1756-6266</issn><issn>1756-6274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwANwscQ7Y8U-SI6oKFFXiQs_GdbZtqsQOtiPat8dRERISl905zMyuPoRuKbmnlJQPi9fneUaqLCeUZYRIcoYmtBAyk3nBz3-1lJfoKoR9clSciAn6WIXGbrHG3dDGpm8BdxB3rsba1rhrDpCmqwHrvvdOmx2ODsNBd40F_OU6sBhs9NB7sDB4bGHrYqPj2BnisYVwjS42ug1w87OnaPU0f5-9ZMu358XscZkZVrGYFesyN6YuCyYLKoGtJdOGmwpKTplgVU6SzCUhIExRC8GlMbmgoqz5WpNUMUV3p9705-cAIaq9G7xNJ1WeAJWcFIInFz25jHcheNio3jed9kdFiRpBqhGkIpUaQaoRZMqQUwY68Lqt_438Yc--AZzJdJQ</recordid><startdate>20160314</startdate><enddate>20160314</enddate><creator>Swartz, Ethné</creator><creator>Amatucci, Frances M</creator><creator>Coleman, Susan</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7R6</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGEN</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160314</creationdate><title>Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles</title><author>Swartz, Ethné ; Amatucci, Frances M ; Coleman, Susan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Equity capital</topic><topic>Equity financing</topic><topic>Informal economy</topic><topic>Negotiations</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Venture capital</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Women owned businesses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Ethné</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amatucci, Frances M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Susan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>GenderWatch</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of gender and entrepreneurship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swartz, Ethné</au><au>Amatucci, Frances M</au><au>Coleman, Susan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gender and entrepreneurship</jtitle><date>2016-03-14</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>48-68</pages><issn>1756-6266</issn><eissn>1756-6274</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal research design for research on women entrepreneurs involved in negotiating term sheets for private equity capital. This research explores new ways for researchers to connect with such current “invisibles” through the use of a mixed method and mixed mode research design to expand sampling options and secure respondent participation. The authors discuss existing data sets that have been used as secondary sources for data on financing of companies and consider their inadequacy for research questions about process issues in negotiation. The authors present process-related findings regarding the efficacy of the research design.
Design/methodology/approach
– This paper reviews research on research methodology, incorporating a discussion of practices outside of the entrepreneurship discipline to discover effective practices for identifying respondents and data not currently captured in entrepreneurship data sources. The respondents were found through social media sites, angel networks, University networks and via identification through a proprietary financial intelligence database.
Findings
– An optimal research design to identify women business owners of growth-oriented firms who have negotiated private equity should consider mixed methods designs and mixed modes, including the use of digital networks that signal to potential respondents that research is being done.
Research limitations/implications
– Although the authors developed the multi-method, mixed mode (MMMM) research design, the sample size is still relatively small. This raises concerns about generalizability to the larger population and limits statistical analysis more suitable with larger data sets. However, the MMMM research design has enabled the authors to reach a difficult target sample. It has proven effective, although a longer time frame would have been helpful.
Research limitations/implications
– All of the large scale databases in entrepreneurship have limitations in providing optimal sampling frames for process-related research. The present research study was able to use conventional networks, social media sites and angel networks to connect with women business owners who have raised private equity, but who lack visibility in current data sets. The study shows that through the use of multiple methods, women entrepreneurs can be researched and some will share their experiences about process issues. The sample size was small and the quantitative data cannot be generalized. However, the methodology works and allows researchers to explore experiences that are not captured in existing data sets.
Social implications
– Entrepreneurship researchers can connect with “invisibles” by becoming more “social” and using social media sites that are used by women entrepreneurs. Researchers may not have immediate access to women entrepreneurs through these means, but rather they need to develop interpersonal contacts, build a social presence and trust to recruit respondents to complete online questionnaire studies about substantive topics such as negotiating term sheets for equity investments in their companies.
Originality/value
– This paper summarizes the “research on research methodologies” in entrepreneurship, reviews secondary data sources and discusses their limitations for specific types of research questions. A review of the value of MMMM research designs and best practices in online survey research outside of entrepreneurship provides insights into the incorporation of digital tools in other disciplines.</abstract><cop>Bingley</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJGE-09-2013-0060</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1756-6266 |
ispartof | International journal of gender and entrepreneurship, 2016-03, Vol.8 (1), p.48-68 |
issn | 1756-6266 1756-6274 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2108840754 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Datasets Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Equity capital Equity financing Informal economy Negotiations Polls & surveys Qualitative research Research design Research methodology Social networks Social research Strategy Venture capital Women Women owned businesses |
title | Using a multiple method and mixed mode approach to examine women entrepreneur negotiating styles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20a%20multiple%20method%20and%20mixed%20mode%20approach%20to%20examine%20women%20entrepreneur%20negotiating%20styles&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gender%20and%20entrepreneurship&rft.au=Swartz,%20Ethn%C3%A9&rft.date=2016-03-14&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=48-68&rft.issn=1756-6266&rft.eissn=1756-6274&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJGE-09-2013-0060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E2108840754%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7b82ccd8736716e3b63ac4c9e8413539209e82600e5c7d5546cc25158d4ba0393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2108840754&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |