Measuring the Cyclicality of Real Wages: How Important is Composition Bias?

In the period since the 1960s, as in other periods, aggregate time series on real wages have displayed only modest cyclicality. Macroeconomists therefore have described weak cyclicality of real wages as a salient feature of the business cycle. Contrary to this conventional wisdom, our analysis of lo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Quarterly journal of economics 1994-02, Vol.109 (1), p.1-25
Main Authors: Solon, Gary, Barsky, Robert, Parker, Jonathan A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Business cycles
Economic fluctuations
Economic models
Economic statistics
Economic theory
Employment
Labor supply
Macroeconomics
Procyclicality
Real wages
Statistical bias
Studies
Time series
Wages
Wages & salaries
Work hours
Written composition
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the period since the 1960s, as in other periods, aggregate time series on real wages have displayed only modest cyclicality. Macroeconomists therefore have described weak cyclicality of real wages as a salient feature of the business cycle. Contrary to this conventional wisdom, our analysis of longitudinal microdata indicates that real wages have been substantially procyclical since the 1960s. We show that the true procyclicality of real wages is obscured in aggregate time series because of a composition bias: the aggregate statistics are constructed in a way that gives more weight to low-skill workers during expansions than during recessions.
ISSN:0033-5533
1531-4650
DOI:10.2307/2118426