Loading…
TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change
Many empirical studies show that teachers have difficulty designing technology-integrated lessons for student-centered learning. Supporting teachers to change their pedagogical practice is a challenge faced in teacher professional development for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)....
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational technology research and development 2019-06, Vol.67 (3), p.577-595 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23 |
container_end_page | 595 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 577 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling |
description | Many empirical studies show that teachers have difficulty designing technology-integrated lessons for student-centered learning. Supporting teachers to change their pedagogical practice is a challenge faced in teacher professional development for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). This study describes how teachers' conceptions of pedagogical change can be supported through the use of different kinds of TPACK design scaffolds—a meaningful learning rubric, lesson design heuristics and TPACK Activity Types. The impact of these design scaffolds on the TPACK confidence and lesson design confidence of 47 teachers and instructors who were attending a graduate course in educational technology were assessed through pre and post course surveys. Expert ratings of technology-integrated lesson plans designed at the beginning and end of the course were also used to determine the extent of pedagogical change enacted. It was found that these design scaffolds had positive effects on teachers' TPACK confidence and were useful for helping the teachers to articulate pedagogical change in their lesson designs. Participants' feedback for improving the TPACK design scaffolds as well as guidelines for using these to support pedagogical change through TPACK professional development programmes are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2110113189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713965027</galeid><ericid>EJ1214790</ericid><jstor_id>26746283</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713965027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1PwyAYxxujiXP6ATyYNPHcyQMtlJvL4vsSPcwzofSh67KVCt3Bby9LzbwKB57wf4H8kuQayAwIEXcBIKcsI1BmklORFSfJBIqCZ7wgcBpnktMMOJXnyUUIGxKX4OUkuV99zBdvaY2hbbo0GG2t29Yhtc6nYd_3zg9t16QDarNGn_ZY68Y1rdHb1Kx11-Blcmb1NuDV7zlNPh8fVovnbPn-9LKYLzPDpBwytChLmsuK0YJVkmsrNXDJalMV0gpDeE4BrJUkJyjQCsopMIy6ZhXUlE2T27G39-5rj2FQG7f3XXxSxSABYFDK6JqNrkZvUbWddYPXJu4ad61xHdo23s8FMBnBUBEDMAaMdyF4tKr37U77bwVEHciqkayKZNWBrCpi5mbMoG_N0f_wChRyIUnU6aiHqEVE_u-r_yjdhMH5YyvlIue0ZOwHnt2M0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2110113189</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>JSTOR</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</creator><creatorcontrib>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</creatorcontrib><description>Many empirical studies show that teachers have difficulty designing technology-integrated lessons for student-centered learning. Supporting teachers to change their pedagogical practice is a challenge faced in teacher professional development for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). This study describes how teachers' conceptions of pedagogical change can be supported through the use of different kinds of TPACK design scaffolds—a meaningful learning rubric, lesson design heuristics and TPACK Activity Types. The impact of these design scaffolds on the TPACK confidence and lesson design confidence of 47 teachers and instructors who were attending a graduate course in educational technology were assessed through pre and post course surveys. Expert ratings of technology-integrated lesson plans designed at the beginning and end of the course were also used to determine the extent of pedagogical change enacted. It was found that these design scaffolds had positive effects on teachers' TPACK confidence and were useful for helping the teachers to articulate pedagogical change in their lesson designs. Participants' feedback for improving the TPACK design scaffolds as well as guidelines for using these to support pedagogical change through TPACK professional development programmes are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Design ; Education ; Educational Change ; Educational Practices ; Educational Technology ; Faculty Development ; Feedback (Response) ; Graduate Students ; Guidelines ; Instructional Design ; Knowledge ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Lesson Plans ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Pedagogy ; Professional development ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Self Efficacy ; Student Centered Learning ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Surveys ; Teachers ; Technological Literacy ; Technology Integration</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2019-06, Vol.67 (3), p.577-595</ispartof><rights>2019 Association for Educational Communications & Technology</rights><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Educational Technology Research and Development is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5626-4927</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2110113189/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2110113189?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,58238,58471,74221,74397</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1214790$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</creatorcontrib><title>TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Many empirical studies show that teachers have difficulty designing technology-integrated lessons for student-centered learning. Supporting teachers to change their pedagogical practice is a challenge faced in teacher professional development for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). This study describes how teachers' conceptions of pedagogical change can be supported through the use of different kinds of TPACK design scaffolds—a meaningful learning rubric, lesson design heuristics and TPACK Activity Types. The impact of these design scaffolds on the TPACK confidence and lesson design confidence of 47 teachers and instructors who were attending a graduate course in educational technology were assessed through pre and post course surveys. Expert ratings of technology-integrated lesson plans designed at the beginning and end of the course were also used to determine the extent of pedagogical change enacted. It was found that these design scaffolds had positive effects on teachers' TPACK confidence and were useful for helping the teachers to articulate pedagogical change in their lesson designs. Participants' feedback for improving the TPACK design scaffolds as well as guidelines for using these to support pedagogical change through TPACK professional development programmes are discussed.</description><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Lesson Plans</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Student Centered Learning</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Surveys</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technological Literacy</subject><subject>Technology Integration</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1PwyAYxxujiXP6ATyYNPHcyQMtlJvL4vsSPcwzofSh67KVCt3Bby9LzbwKB57wf4H8kuQayAwIEXcBIKcsI1BmklORFSfJBIqCZ7wgcBpnktMMOJXnyUUIGxKX4OUkuV99zBdvaY2hbbo0GG2t29Yhtc6nYd_3zg9t16QDarNGn_ZY68Y1rdHb1Kx11-Blcmb1NuDV7zlNPh8fVovnbPn-9LKYLzPDpBwytChLmsuK0YJVkmsrNXDJalMV0gpDeE4BrJUkJyjQCsopMIy6ZhXUlE2T27G39-5rj2FQG7f3XXxSxSABYFDK6JqNrkZvUbWddYPXJu4ad61xHdo23s8FMBnBUBEDMAaMdyF4tKr37U77bwVEHciqkayKZNWBrCpi5mbMoG_N0f_wChRyIUnU6aiHqEVE_u-r_yjdhMH5YyvlIue0ZOwHnt2M0Q</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-4927</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change</title><author>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Lesson Plans</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Student Centered Learning</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Surveys</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technological Literacy</topic><topic>Technology Integration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1214790</ericid><atitle>TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>577</spage><epage>595</epage><pages>577-595</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Many empirical studies show that teachers have difficulty designing technology-integrated lessons for student-centered learning. Supporting teachers to change their pedagogical practice is a challenge faced in teacher professional development for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). This study describes how teachers' conceptions of pedagogical change can be supported through the use of different kinds of TPACK design scaffolds—a meaningful learning rubric, lesson design heuristics and TPACK Activity Types. The impact of these design scaffolds on the TPACK confidence and lesson design confidence of 47 teachers and instructors who were attending a graduate course in educational technology were assessed through pre and post course surveys. Expert ratings of technology-integrated lesson plans designed at the beginning and end of the course were also used to determine the extent of pedagogical change enacted. It was found that these design scaffolds had positive effects on teachers' TPACK confidence and were useful for helping the teachers to articulate pedagogical change in their lesson designs. Participants' feedback for improving the TPACK design scaffolds as well as guidelines for using these to support pedagogical change through TPACK professional development programmes are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5626-4927</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2019-06, Vol.67 (3), p.577-595 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2110113189 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; ERIC; JSTOR; Education Collection |
subjects | Design Education Educational Change Educational Practices Educational Technology Faculty Development Feedback (Response) Graduate Students Guidelines Instructional Design Knowledge Learning Learning and Instruction Lesson Plans Pedagogical Content Knowledge Pedagogy Professional development RESEARCH ARTICLE Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) Self Efficacy Student Centered Learning Teacher Attitudes Teacher Surveys Teachers Technological Literacy Technology Integration |
title | TPACK design scaffolds for supporting teacher pedagogical change |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A11%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=TPACK%20design%20scaffolds%20for%20supporting%20teacher%20pedagogical%20change&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Koh,%20Joyce%20Hwee%20Ling&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=577&rft.epage=595&rft.pages=577-595&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-018-9627-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA713965027%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-efe98249b3253b96af9a1693dcb59f7c064211ff9040e7ef726213e3dca3b1d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2110113189&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713965027&rft_ericid=EJ1214790&rft_jstor_id=26746283&rfr_iscdi=true |