Fracking Fortunes: Economic Well‐being and Oil and Gas Development along the Urban‐Rural Continuum

Oil and gas extraction, especially via unconventional means like hydraulic fracturing, is hailed as an economic boon by many commentators and political leaders. However, empirical evidence is limited. In this article, we consider the socioeconomic effects (particularly, related to poverty, employmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rural sociology 2018-09, Vol.83 (3), p.532-567
Main Authors: Mayer, Adam, Olson‐Hazboun, Shawn K., Malin, Stephanie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Conditioning
Counties
Economic conditions
Economic development
Economic well being
Economics
Employment
Extraction
Gas production
Hydraulic fracturing
Income
Oil and gas production
Petroleum
Political leadership
Politics
Poverty
Production
Random effects
Rural areas
Rural development
Rural urban continuum
Rurality
Socioeconomic factors
Urban development
Wages & salaries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Oil and gas extraction, especially via unconventional means like hydraulic fracturing, is hailed as an economic boon by many commentators and political leaders. However, empirical evidence is limited. In this article, we consider the socioeconomic effects (particularly, related to poverty, employment, income, and wages) of unconventional oil and gas extraction using a national data set of U.S. counties. We use a novel between‐ and within‐county random effects modeling strategy to capture both resource curse and boomtown dynamics. Further, we allow the effect of oil and gas development to be conditioned by county rurality. Broadly, our findings suggest that oil and gas development has very complex effects at the county level. Within‐county growth in oil and gas production slightly improves most economic outcomes, but counties that specialize in oil and gas development tend to perform worse than other counties. We find that, in general, the effect of within‐county oil and gas production is not significantly moderated by county rurality.
ISSN:0036-0112
1549-0831
DOI:10.1111/ruso.12198