Valuation of an early exercise defined benefit underpin hybrid pension

• Published in: Scandinavian actuarial journal 2018-10, Vol.2018 (9), p.823-844
• Main Authors: Zhu, Xiaobai, Hardy, Mary, Saunders, David
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actuarial science; Defined benefit plans; Defined contribution plans; embedded options; Employee benefits; Employees; Hybrid pension benefit; optimal exercise; Pension plans
• ISSN: 0346-1238; 1651-2030
• DOI: 10.1080/03461238.2018.1463556

In this paper, we consider three types of embedded options in pension benefit design. The first is the Florida second election (FSE) option, which has been offered to public employees in the state of Florida since 2002. The state runs both defined contribution (DC) and defined benefit (DB) pension plans. Employees who initially join the DC plan have the option to convert to the (DB) plan at a time of their choosing. The cost of the switch is assessed in terms of the ABO (Accrued Benefit Obligation), which is the expected present value of the accrued DB pension at the time of the switch. If the ABO is greater than the DC account, the employee is required to fund the difference. The second is the DB Underpin option, also known as a 'floor offset' or a 'Greater-of-benefit' plan, under which the employee participates in a DC plan, but with a guaranteed minimum benefit based on a traditional DB formula. The third option can be considered a variation on each of the first two. We remove the requirement from the FSE option for employees to fund any shortfall at the switching date. The resulting plan is similar to the DB underpin, but with the possibility of early exercise. We adopt an arbitrage-free pricing methodology to value each option. We analyse and value the optimal switching strategy for the employee by constructing an exercise frontier, and we illustrate numerically the difference between the FSE, DB Underpin and Early Exercise DB Underpin options.