Loading…

Performance of molten sodium vs. molten salts in a packed bed thermal energy storage

•A one-dimensional packed bed system is simulated with sodium and molten salts.•Sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies than molten salts.•During stand by the thermocline region expands faster with sodium.•Small tank height-to-diameter ratios and small particles benefit all fluids.•For s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied thermal engineering 2018-08, Vol.141, p.368-377
Main Authors: Niedermeier, Klarissa, Marocco, Luca, Flesch, Jonathan, Mohan, Gowtham, Coventry, Joe, Wetzel, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43
container_end_page 377
container_issue
container_start_page 368
container_title Applied thermal engineering
container_volume 141
creator Niedermeier, Klarissa
Marocco, Luca
Flesch, Jonathan
Mohan, Gowtham
Coventry, Joe
Wetzel, Thomas
description •A one-dimensional packed bed system is simulated with sodium and molten salts.•Sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies than molten salts.•During stand by the thermocline region expands faster with sodium.•Small tank height-to-diameter ratios and small particles benefit all fluids.•For sodium small porosities are advantageous, for molten salts high porosities. Concentrating solar power plants are currently working with Solar Salt and conventional Rankine steam power cycles with upper temperatures of 565 °C. To achieve higher efficiencies, advanced power cycles are currently investigated (500–700 °C). As heat transfer fluids, both molten sodium and three types of molten salt are considered in this study. For power tower plants, the heat transfer fluid is typically also the storage medium. This is the case for state-of-the-art commercial plants using molten salt, and past and present pilot plants using sodium. However, this work shows for both cases that a packed bed arrangement, where the heat transfer fluid is replaced by a filler material, may be a technically feasible and economically viable alternative. Furthermore, for sodium there are additional safety concerns related to having a large sodium inventory, which the packed bed arrangement can help alleviate. In this study, a 40 MWhth storage system with quartzite as filler material is numerically investigated with a one-dimensional model. The results are evaluated in terms of discharge efficiency, pumping power, storage cost and thermocline degradation during standby to assess the potential of this storage solution for future scientific investigations. The packed bed system with sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies (96.8%) than with molten salt (95.2–95.7%) and also lower required pumping power. However, the thermocline region expands faster during standby due to the high thermal conductivity of sodium. The influence of porosity, tank diameter-to-height ratio and filler particle diameter is analysed in a parametric study. Highest discharge efficiencies are achieved for both sodium and molten salts with small tank diameter-to-height ratios and small filler particles. For sodium, low porosities are preferable, while for molten salts, high porosities lead to better discharge efficiencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.080
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2115765434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1359431117373027</els_id><sourcerecordid>2115765434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfIaDXXfNvN1nwIsWqUNBDPYc0mdRdt5s12Rb67d3SInjzMMwwvDeP-SF0R0lOCS3vm9z0fTt8QtyYFrp1zghVOSlyosgZmlAleVaUpDwfZ15UmeCUXqKrlBpCKFNSTNDyHaIPo7-zgIPHm9AO0OEUXL3d4F3KfzemHRKuO2xwb-wXOLwa65SNoYO43uM0hGjWcI0uvGkT3Jz6FH3Mn5azl2zx9vw6e1xkVohqyCx1RnKunF1RD4YaKUrmVMW8ks4ragwjpaooMaXkyhNhwAllmJcVUQwEn6Lb490-hu8tpEE3YRu7MVIzSgtZFoIfVA9HlY0hpQhe97HemLjXlOgDR93ovxz1gaMmhR45jvb50Q7jJ7saok62hhGXqyPYQbtQ_-_QD9yFhOQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2115765434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of molten sodium vs. molten salts in a packed bed thermal energy storage</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Niedermeier, Klarissa ; Marocco, Luca ; Flesch, Jonathan ; Mohan, Gowtham ; Coventry, Joe ; Wetzel, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Niedermeier, Klarissa ; Marocco, Luca ; Flesch, Jonathan ; Mohan, Gowtham ; Coventry, Joe ; Wetzel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>•A one-dimensional packed bed system is simulated with sodium and molten salts.•Sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies than molten salts.•During stand by the thermocline region expands faster with sodium.•Small tank height-to-diameter ratios and small particles benefit all fluids.•For sodium small porosities are advantageous, for molten salts high porosities. Concentrating solar power plants are currently working with Solar Salt and conventional Rankine steam power cycles with upper temperatures of 565 °C. To achieve higher efficiencies, advanced power cycles are currently investigated (500–700 °C). As heat transfer fluids, both molten sodium and three types of molten salt are considered in this study. For power tower plants, the heat transfer fluid is typically also the storage medium. This is the case for state-of-the-art commercial plants using molten salt, and past and present pilot plants using sodium. However, this work shows for both cases that a packed bed arrangement, where the heat transfer fluid is replaced by a filler material, may be a technically feasible and economically viable alternative. Furthermore, for sodium there are additional safety concerns related to having a large sodium inventory, which the packed bed arrangement can help alleviate. In this study, a 40 MWhth storage system with quartzite as filler material is numerically investigated with a one-dimensional model. The results are evaluated in terms of discharge efficiency, pumping power, storage cost and thermocline degradation during standby to assess the potential of this storage solution for future scientific investigations. The packed bed system with sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies (96.8%) than with molten salt (95.2–95.7%) and also lower required pumping power. However, the thermocline region expands faster during standby due to the high thermal conductivity of sodium. The influence of porosity, tank diameter-to-height ratio and filler particle diameter is analysed in a parametric study. Highest discharge efficiencies are achieved for both sodium and molten salts with small tank diameter-to-height ratios and small filler particles. For sodium, low porosities are preferable, while for molten salts, high porosities lead to better discharge efficiencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-4311</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computational fluid dynamics ; Discharge ; Energy storage ; Heat transfer ; Liquid metal ; Mathematical models ; Molten salts ; One dimensional models ; Packed bed ; Packed bed reactors ; Packed beds ; Particle size ; Porosity ; Power efficiency ; Power plants ; Pumping ; Quartzite ; Salt ; Sodium ; Steam electric power generation ; Thermal conductivity ; Thermal energy ; Thermal energy storage ; Thermocline</subject><ispartof>Applied thermal engineering, 2018-08, Vol.141, p.368-377</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4020-3980</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niedermeier, Klarissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marocco, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flesch, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Gowtham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coventry, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of molten sodium vs. molten salts in a packed bed thermal energy storage</title><title>Applied thermal engineering</title><description>•A one-dimensional packed bed system is simulated with sodium and molten salts.•Sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies than molten salts.•During stand by the thermocline region expands faster with sodium.•Small tank height-to-diameter ratios and small particles benefit all fluids.•For sodium small porosities are advantageous, for molten salts high porosities. Concentrating solar power plants are currently working with Solar Salt and conventional Rankine steam power cycles with upper temperatures of 565 °C. To achieve higher efficiencies, advanced power cycles are currently investigated (500–700 °C). As heat transfer fluids, both molten sodium and three types of molten salt are considered in this study. For power tower plants, the heat transfer fluid is typically also the storage medium. This is the case for state-of-the-art commercial plants using molten salt, and past and present pilot plants using sodium. However, this work shows for both cases that a packed bed arrangement, where the heat transfer fluid is replaced by a filler material, may be a technically feasible and economically viable alternative. Furthermore, for sodium there are additional safety concerns related to having a large sodium inventory, which the packed bed arrangement can help alleviate. In this study, a 40 MWhth storage system with quartzite as filler material is numerically investigated with a one-dimensional model. The results are evaluated in terms of discharge efficiency, pumping power, storage cost and thermocline degradation during standby to assess the potential of this storage solution for future scientific investigations. The packed bed system with sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies (96.8%) than with molten salt (95.2–95.7%) and also lower required pumping power. However, the thermocline region expands faster during standby due to the high thermal conductivity of sodium. The influence of porosity, tank diameter-to-height ratio and filler particle diameter is analysed in a parametric study. Highest discharge efficiencies are achieved for both sodium and molten salts with small tank diameter-to-height ratios and small filler particles. For sodium, low porosities are preferable, while for molten salts, high porosities lead to better discharge efficiencies.</description><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Energy storage</subject><subject>Heat transfer</subject><subject>Liquid metal</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Molten salts</subject><subject>One dimensional models</subject><subject>Packed bed</subject><subject>Packed bed reactors</subject><subject>Packed beds</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Power efficiency</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Pumping</subject><subject>Quartzite</subject><subject>Salt</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Steam electric power generation</subject><subject>Thermal conductivity</subject><subject>Thermal energy</subject><subject>Thermal energy storage</subject><subject>Thermocline</subject><issn>1359-4311</issn><issn>1873-5606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE9LAzEQxYMoWKvfIaDXXfNvN1nwIsWqUNBDPYc0mdRdt5s12Rb67d3SInjzMMwwvDeP-SF0R0lOCS3vm9z0fTt8QtyYFrp1zghVOSlyosgZmlAleVaUpDwfZ15UmeCUXqKrlBpCKFNSTNDyHaIPo7-zgIPHm9AO0OEUXL3d4F3KfzemHRKuO2xwb-wXOLwa65SNoYO43uM0hGjWcI0uvGkT3Jz6FH3Mn5azl2zx9vw6e1xkVohqyCx1RnKunF1RD4YaKUrmVMW8ks4ragwjpaooMaXkyhNhwAllmJcVUQwEn6Lb490-hu8tpEE3YRu7MVIzSgtZFoIfVA9HlY0hpQhe97HemLjXlOgDR93ovxz1gaMmhR45jvb50Q7jJ7saok62hhGXqyPYQbtQ_-_QD9yFhOQ</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Niedermeier, Klarissa</creator><creator>Marocco, Luca</creator><creator>Flesch, Jonathan</creator><creator>Mohan, Gowtham</creator><creator>Coventry, Joe</creator><creator>Wetzel, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-3980</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Performance of molten sodium vs. molten salts in a packed bed thermal energy storage</title><author>Niedermeier, Klarissa ; Marocco, Luca ; Flesch, Jonathan ; Mohan, Gowtham ; Coventry, Joe ; Wetzel, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Energy storage</topic><topic>Heat transfer</topic><topic>Liquid metal</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Molten salts</topic><topic>One dimensional models</topic><topic>Packed bed</topic><topic>Packed bed reactors</topic><topic>Packed beds</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Power efficiency</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Pumping</topic><topic>Quartzite</topic><topic>Salt</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Steam electric power generation</topic><topic>Thermal conductivity</topic><topic>Thermal energy</topic><topic>Thermal energy storage</topic><topic>Thermocline</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niedermeier, Klarissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marocco, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flesch, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Gowtham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coventry, Joe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied thermal engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niedermeier, Klarissa</au><au>Marocco, Luca</au><au>Flesch, Jonathan</au><au>Mohan, Gowtham</au><au>Coventry, Joe</au><au>Wetzel, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of molten sodium vs. molten salts in a packed bed thermal energy storage</atitle><jtitle>Applied thermal engineering</jtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>141</volume><spage>368</spage><epage>377</epage><pages>368-377</pages><issn>1359-4311</issn><eissn>1873-5606</eissn><abstract>•A one-dimensional packed bed system is simulated with sodium and molten salts.•Sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies than molten salts.•During stand by the thermocline region expands faster with sodium.•Small tank height-to-diameter ratios and small particles benefit all fluids.•For sodium small porosities are advantageous, for molten salts high porosities. Concentrating solar power plants are currently working with Solar Salt and conventional Rankine steam power cycles with upper temperatures of 565 °C. To achieve higher efficiencies, advanced power cycles are currently investigated (500–700 °C). As heat transfer fluids, both molten sodium and three types of molten salt are considered in this study. For power tower plants, the heat transfer fluid is typically also the storage medium. This is the case for state-of-the-art commercial plants using molten salt, and past and present pilot plants using sodium. However, this work shows for both cases that a packed bed arrangement, where the heat transfer fluid is replaced by a filler material, may be a technically feasible and economically viable alternative. Furthermore, for sodium there are additional safety concerns related to having a large sodium inventory, which the packed bed arrangement can help alleviate. In this study, a 40 MWhth storage system with quartzite as filler material is numerically investigated with a one-dimensional model. The results are evaluated in terms of discharge efficiency, pumping power, storage cost and thermocline degradation during standby to assess the potential of this storage solution for future scientific investigations. The packed bed system with sodium shows slightly higher discharge efficiencies (96.8%) than with molten salt (95.2–95.7%) and also lower required pumping power. However, the thermocline region expands faster during standby due to the high thermal conductivity of sodium. The influence of porosity, tank diameter-to-height ratio and filler particle diameter is analysed in a parametric study. Highest discharge efficiencies are achieved for both sodium and molten salts with small tank diameter-to-height ratios and small filler particles. For sodium, low porosities are preferable, while for molten salts, high porosities lead to better discharge efficiencies.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.080</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-3980</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-4311
ispartof Applied thermal engineering, 2018-08, Vol.141, p.368-377
issn 1359-4311
1873-5606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2115765434
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Computational fluid dynamics
Discharge
Energy storage
Heat transfer
Liquid metal
Mathematical models
Molten salts
One dimensional models
Packed bed
Packed bed reactors
Packed beds
Particle size
Porosity
Power efficiency
Power plants
Pumping
Quartzite
Salt
Sodium
Steam electric power generation
Thermal conductivity
Thermal energy
Thermal energy storage
Thermocline
title Performance of molten sodium vs. molten salts in a packed bed thermal energy storage
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A28%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20molten%20sodium%20vs.%20molten%20salts%20in%20a%20packed%20bed%20thermal%20energy%20storage&rft.jtitle=Applied%20thermal%20engineering&rft.au=Niedermeier,%20Klarissa&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=141&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=377&rft.pages=368-377&rft.issn=1359-4311&rft.eissn=1873-5606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.05.080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2115765434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-c1da7338dcb1fea1a7462d892f87df81aa2068910a6738f04aed48a2f79082e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2115765434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true