Loading…

Influence of alumina binders on adhesion and cohesion during preparation of Cu‐SAPO‐34/monolith catalysts

The adhesion and cohesion between the coating layers and the ceramic honeycombs are usually one of the key issues in the preparation of high‐performance zeolite‐based/Monolith catalysts. In this work, we investigate the deposition of high‐efficiency Cu‐SAPO‐34 catalyst on a cordierite monolith with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of applied ceramic technology 2018-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1490-1501
Main Authors: Kong, Xiangli, Qiu, Minghui, Wang, Anran, Yang, Lu, Zhou, Rongfei, Fan, Yiqun, Kong, Deshuang, Gu, Changjun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333
container_end_page 1501
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1490
container_title International journal of applied ceramic technology
container_volume 15
creator Kong, Xiangli
Qiu, Minghui
Wang, Anran
Yang, Lu
Zhou, Rongfei
Fan, Yiqun
Kong, Deshuang
Gu, Changjun
description The adhesion and cohesion between the coating layers and the ceramic honeycombs are usually one of the key issues in the preparation of high‐performance zeolite‐based/Monolith catalysts. In this work, we investigate the deposition of high‐efficiency Cu‐SAPO‐34 catalyst on a cordierite monolith with special focus on the impact of alumina binders on the structure, mechanical adhesion and cohesion, and catalytic performance of the monolithic catalyst. Two kinds of alumina nanoparticles, α‐alumina and γ‐alumina, have no significant impacts on the Cu‐SAPO‐34 crystal structure, micropore morphology and catalytic activity. But washcoating experiments showed that the mass loss rate of the coating was less and the loading of the catalyst was higher when α‐alumina was used as the binder. The reason of improving the adhesion and cohesion strength is the suitable thermal shrinkage, the uniform distribution and densification structure of α‐alumina. Furthermore, optimization of the coating formulation with α‐alumina as the binder has been performed. Finally, the catalyst prepared under the optimal conditions was tested by SCR and a maximum conversion rate of 97.4% was obtained. It was concluded that the use of the washcoating method with α‐alumina does not affect catalytic performance while it increases bonding strength between substrate and catalysts.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijac.13008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2115980690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2115980690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KwzAUx4MoOKc3PkHBO6FbsqRJejmGHxNhggrehTRNXEab1KRFducj-Iw-ia3dtefmfP3-58AfgEsEZ6iPud1JNUMYQn4EJogRkjICF8d9nRGaZmTxdgrOYtxBiAnGdALqtTNVp53SiTeJrLraOpkU1pU6xMS7RJZbHe1QuDJR_tCUXbDuPWmCbmSQ7TDq5avu5-v7efm06RMm89o7X9l2myjZymof23gOToysor445Cl4vb15Wd2nj5u79Wr5mCqMOU8JKggyVKNC5YZhnBlONSuUxIwyKQvGaJ5xaSjkGSekxFyW_QYbpTTMMMZTcDXebYL_6HRsxc53wfUvxQKhLOeQ5rCnrkdKBR9j0EY0wdYy7AWCYrBTDHaKPzt7GI3wp630_h9SrB-Wq1HzCwZVecM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2115980690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of alumina binders on adhesion and cohesion during preparation of Cu‐SAPO‐34/monolith catalysts</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kong, Xiangli ; Qiu, Minghui ; Wang, Anran ; Yang, Lu ; Zhou, Rongfei ; Fan, Yiqun ; Kong, Deshuang ; Gu, Changjun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kong, Xiangli ; Qiu, Minghui ; Wang, Anran ; Yang, Lu ; Zhou, Rongfei ; Fan, Yiqun ; Kong, Deshuang ; Gu, Changjun</creatorcontrib><description>The adhesion and cohesion between the coating layers and the ceramic honeycombs are usually one of the key issues in the preparation of high‐performance zeolite‐based/Monolith catalysts. In this work, we investigate the deposition of high‐efficiency Cu‐SAPO‐34 catalyst on a cordierite monolith with special focus on the impact of alumina binders on the structure, mechanical adhesion and cohesion, and catalytic performance of the monolithic catalyst. Two kinds of alumina nanoparticles, α‐alumina and γ‐alumina, have no significant impacts on the Cu‐SAPO‐34 crystal structure, micropore morphology and catalytic activity. But washcoating experiments showed that the mass loss rate of the coating was less and the loading of the catalyst was higher when α‐alumina was used as the binder. The reason of improving the adhesion and cohesion strength is the suitable thermal shrinkage, the uniform distribution and densification structure of α‐alumina. Furthermore, optimization of the coating formulation with α‐alumina as the binder has been performed. Finally, the catalyst prepared under the optimal conditions was tested by SCR and a maximum conversion rate of 97.4% was obtained. It was concluded that the use of the washcoating method with α‐alumina does not affect catalytic performance while it increases bonding strength between substrate and catalysts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-542X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-7402</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijac.13008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adhesive strength ; Adhesives ; adhesives/adhesion ; Alumina ; Aluminum oxide ; binders/binding ; Bonding strength ; Catalysis ; Catalysts ; catalysts/catalysis ; Catalytic activity ; Ceramic coatings ; Ceramic honeycombs ; Cohesion ; Copper ; Cordierite ; Crystal structure ; Densification ; Morphology ; Nanoparticles ; Shrinkage ; Substrates ; Zeolite monoliths</subject><ispartof>International journal of applied ceramic technology, 2018-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1490-1501</ispartof><rights>2018 The American Ceramic Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 American Ceramic Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2455-8979</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kong, Xiangli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Anran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Rongfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Deshuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Changjun</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of alumina binders on adhesion and cohesion during preparation of Cu‐SAPO‐34/monolith catalysts</title><title>International journal of applied ceramic technology</title><description>The adhesion and cohesion between the coating layers and the ceramic honeycombs are usually one of the key issues in the preparation of high‐performance zeolite‐based/Monolith catalysts. In this work, we investigate the deposition of high‐efficiency Cu‐SAPO‐34 catalyst on a cordierite monolith with special focus on the impact of alumina binders on the structure, mechanical adhesion and cohesion, and catalytic performance of the monolithic catalyst. Two kinds of alumina nanoparticles, α‐alumina and γ‐alumina, have no significant impacts on the Cu‐SAPO‐34 crystal structure, micropore morphology and catalytic activity. But washcoating experiments showed that the mass loss rate of the coating was less and the loading of the catalyst was higher when α‐alumina was used as the binder. The reason of improving the adhesion and cohesion strength is the suitable thermal shrinkage, the uniform distribution and densification structure of α‐alumina. Furthermore, optimization of the coating formulation with α‐alumina as the binder has been performed. Finally, the catalyst prepared under the optimal conditions was tested by SCR and a maximum conversion rate of 97.4% was obtained. It was concluded that the use of the washcoating method with α‐alumina does not affect catalytic performance while it increases bonding strength between substrate and catalysts.</description><subject>Adhesive strength</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>adhesives/adhesion</subject><subject>Alumina</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>binders/binding</subject><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>Catalysis</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>catalysts/catalysis</subject><subject>Catalytic activity</subject><subject>Ceramic coatings</subject><subject>Ceramic honeycombs</subject><subject>Cohesion</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Cordierite</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Densification</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Nanoparticles</subject><subject>Shrinkage</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Zeolite monoliths</subject><issn>1546-542X</issn><issn>1744-7402</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KwzAUx4MoOKc3PkHBO6FbsqRJejmGHxNhggrehTRNXEab1KRFducj-Iw-ia3dtefmfP3-58AfgEsEZ6iPud1JNUMYQn4EJogRkjICF8d9nRGaZmTxdgrOYtxBiAnGdALqtTNVp53SiTeJrLraOpkU1pU6xMS7RJZbHe1QuDJR_tCUXbDuPWmCbmSQ7TDq5avu5-v7efm06RMm89o7X9l2myjZymof23gOToysor445Cl4vb15Wd2nj5u79Wr5mCqMOU8JKggyVKNC5YZhnBlONSuUxIwyKQvGaJ5xaSjkGSekxFyW_QYbpTTMMMZTcDXebYL_6HRsxc53wfUvxQKhLOeQ5rCnrkdKBR9j0EY0wdYy7AWCYrBTDHaKPzt7GI3wp630_h9SrB-Wq1HzCwZVecM</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Kong, Xiangli</creator><creator>Qiu, Minghui</creator><creator>Wang, Anran</creator><creator>Yang, Lu</creator><creator>Zhou, Rongfei</creator><creator>Fan, Yiqun</creator><creator>Kong, Deshuang</creator><creator>Gu, Changjun</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-8979</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Influence of alumina binders on adhesion and cohesion during preparation of Cu‐SAPO‐34/monolith catalysts</title><author>Kong, Xiangli ; Qiu, Minghui ; Wang, Anran ; Yang, Lu ; Zhou, Rongfei ; Fan, Yiqun ; Kong, Deshuang ; Gu, Changjun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adhesive strength</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>adhesives/adhesion</topic><topic>Alumina</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>binders/binding</topic><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>Catalysis</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>catalysts/catalysis</topic><topic>Catalytic activity</topic><topic>Ceramic coatings</topic><topic>Ceramic honeycombs</topic><topic>Cohesion</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Cordierite</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Densification</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Nanoparticles</topic><topic>Shrinkage</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Zeolite monoliths</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kong, Xiangli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Minghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Anran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Rongfei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Yiqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kong, Deshuang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gu, Changjun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International journal of applied ceramic technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kong, Xiangli</au><au>Qiu, Minghui</au><au>Wang, Anran</au><au>Yang, Lu</au><au>Zhou, Rongfei</au><au>Fan, Yiqun</au><au>Kong, Deshuang</au><au>Gu, Changjun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of alumina binders on adhesion and cohesion during preparation of Cu‐SAPO‐34/monolith catalysts</atitle><jtitle>International journal of applied ceramic technology</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1490</spage><epage>1501</epage><pages>1490-1501</pages><issn>1546-542X</issn><eissn>1744-7402</eissn><abstract>The adhesion and cohesion between the coating layers and the ceramic honeycombs are usually one of the key issues in the preparation of high‐performance zeolite‐based/Monolith catalysts. In this work, we investigate the deposition of high‐efficiency Cu‐SAPO‐34 catalyst on a cordierite monolith with special focus on the impact of alumina binders on the structure, mechanical adhesion and cohesion, and catalytic performance of the monolithic catalyst. Two kinds of alumina nanoparticles, α‐alumina and γ‐alumina, have no significant impacts on the Cu‐SAPO‐34 crystal structure, micropore morphology and catalytic activity. But washcoating experiments showed that the mass loss rate of the coating was less and the loading of the catalyst was higher when α‐alumina was used as the binder. The reason of improving the adhesion and cohesion strength is the suitable thermal shrinkage, the uniform distribution and densification structure of α‐alumina. Furthermore, optimization of the coating formulation with α‐alumina as the binder has been performed. Finally, the catalyst prepared under the optimal conditions was tested by SCR and a maximum conversion rate of 97.4% was obtained. It was concluded that the use of the washcoating method with α‐alumina does not affect catalytic performance while it increases bonding strength between substrate and catalysts.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/ijac.13008</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2455-8979</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1546-542X
ispartof International journal of applied ceramic technology, 2018-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1490-1501
issn 1546-542X
1744-7402
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2115980690
source Wiley
subjects Adhesive strength
Adhesives
adhesives/adhesion
Alumina
Aluminum oxide
binders/binding
Bonding strength
Catalysis
Catalysts
catalysts/catalysis
Catalytic activity
Ceramic coatings
Ceramic honeycombs
Cohesion
Copper
Cordierite
Crystal structure
Densification
Morphology
Nanoparticles
Shrinkage
Substrates
Zeolite monoliths
title Influence of alumina binders on adhesion and cohesion during preparation of Cu‐SAPO‐34/monolith catalysts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A06%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20alumina%20binders%20on%20adhesion%20and%20cohesion%20during%20preparation%20of%20Cu%E2%80%90SAPO%E2%80%9034/monolith%20catalysts&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20applied%20ceramic%20technology&rft.au=Kong,%20Xiangli&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1490&rft.epage=1501&rft.pages=1490-1501&rft.issn=1546-542X&rft.eissn=1744-7402&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijac.13008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2115980690%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3388-41b41f6e1bc9f7335f86e7bca3767aab776958af6085844d38ad7673fcce05333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2115980690&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true