Loading…
Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction
Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy policy 2018-09, Vol.120, p.144 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | Energy policy |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Kis, Zoltán Pandya, Nikul Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M |
description | Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2116627133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116627133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21166271333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUFuwjAQRa2qSE2hdxipWyLZcRrTbiOq7tiwDjJmCI4Sm3rsSlyiZ65ROQCrkf77_80DK8RKybJRSj2ygksuyroSb0_smWjgnNer97pgv-sRTQzW2HiBHh0GHa13ENGcnB99b5E-oPXTWQdLGfgjTDpisHokSIRLuI76CwSMKWTuwLofpDihi0sY_J7ABPy3aneAdtNR2kPVAU6WKMeUt4dkro0Fmx2zGF9ud85eP9fb9qs8B_-dsnU3-Pwlo10lRNNUSkgp72v9ARhtV_c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116627133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Kis, Zoltán ; Pandya, Nikul ; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kis, Zoltán ; Pandya, Nikul ; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creatorcontrib><description>Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomass burning ; Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Coal ; Consumption ; Density ; Economic performance ; Economics ; Electricity ; Electricity generation ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Employment ; Energy consumption ; Energy policy ; Extraction ; Fossil fuels ; Gas pipelines ; Gas transport ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Job creation ; Lignite ; Liquefied natural gas ; Natural gas ; Networks ; Offshore operations ; Photovoltaics ; Power ; Return on investment ; Socioeconomic factors ; Solar energy ; Solar power ; Technology ; Transportation ; Variability ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2018-09, Vol.120, p.144</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,33202</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kis, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Nikul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creatorcontrib><title>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.</description><subject>Biomass burning</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Economic performance</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Gas pipelines</subject><subject>Gas transport</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Job creation</subject><subject>Lignite</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar power</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUFuwjAQRa2qSE2hdxipWyLZcRrTbiOq7tiwDjJmCI4Sm3rsSlyiZ65ROQCrkf77_80DK8RKybJRSj2ygksuyroSb0_smWjgnNer97pgv-sRTQzW2HiBHh0GHa13ENGcnB99b5E-oPXTWQdLGfgjTDpisHokSIRLuI76CwSMKWTuwLofpDihi0sY_J7ABPy3aneAdtNR2kPVAU6WKMeUt4dkro0Fmx2zGF9ud85eP9fb9qs8B_-dsnU3-Pwlo10lRNNUSkgp72v9ARhtV_c</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Kis, Zoltán</creator><creator>Pandya, Nikul</creator><creator>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</title><author>Kis, Zoltán ; Pandya, Nikul ; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21166271333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomass burning</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Economic performance</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Gas pipelines</topic><topic>Gas transport</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Job creation</topic><topic>Lignite</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar power</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kis, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Nikul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creatorcontrib><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kis, Zoltán</au><au>Pandya, Nikul</au><au>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>144</spage><pages>144-</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0301-4215 |
ispartof | Energy policy, 2018-09, Vol.120, p.144 |
issn | 0301-4215 1873-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2116627133 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index |
subjects | Biomass burning Carbon Carbon sequestration Coal Consumption Density Economic performance Economics Electricity Electricity generation Emissions Emissions control Employment Energy consumption Energy policy Extraction Fossil fuels Gas pipelines Gas transport Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Job creation Lignite Liquefied natural gas Natural gas Networks Offshore operations Photovoltaics Power Return on investment Socioeconomic factors Solar energy Solar power Technology Transportation Variability Viability |
title | Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A28%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electricity%20generation%20technologies:%20Comparison%20of%20materials%20use,%20energy%20return%20on%20investment,%20jobs%20creation%20and%20CO%5Esub%202%5E%20emissions%20reduction&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Kis,%20Zolt%C3%A1n&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=144&rft.pages=144-&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2116627133%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21166271333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116627133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |