Loading…

Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction

Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy policy 2018-09, Vol.120, p.144
Main Authors: Kis, Zoltán, Pandya, Nikul, Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 144
container_title Energy policy
container_volume 120
creator Kis, Zoltán
Pandya, Nikul
Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M
description Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2116627133</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2116627133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_21166271333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjUFuwjAQRa2qSE2hdxipWyLZcRrTbiOq7tiwDjJmCI4Sm3rsSlyiZ65ROQCrkf77_80DK8RKybJRSj2ygksuyroSb0_smWjgnNer97pgv-sRTQzW2HiBHh0GHa13ENGcnB99b5E-oPXTWQdLGfgjTDpisHokSIRLuI76CwSMKWTuwLofpDihi0sY_J7ABPy3aneAdtNR2kPVAU6WKMeUt4dkro0Fmx2zGF9ud85eP9fb9qs8B_-dsnU3-Pwlo10lRNNUSkgp72v9ARhtV_c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2116627133</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Kis, Zoltán ; Pandya, Nikul ; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creator><creatorcontrib>Kis, Zoltán ; Pandya, Nikul ; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creatorcontrib><description>Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6777</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomass burning ; Carbon ; Carbon sequestration ; Coal ; Consumption ; Density ; Economic performance ; Economics ; Electricity ; Electricity generation ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Employment ; Energy consumption ; Energy policy ; Extraction ; Fossil fuels ; Gas pipelines ; Gas transport ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Job creation ; Lignite ; Liquefied natural gas ; Natural gas ; Networks ; Offshore operations ; Photovoltaics ; Power ; Return on investment ; Socioeconomic factors ; Solar energy ; Solar power ; Technology ; Transportation ; Variability ; Viability</subject><ispartof>Energy policy, 2018-09, Vol.120, p.144</ispartof><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Sep 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27845,33202</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kis, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Nikul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creatorcontrib><title>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</title><title>Energy policy</title><description>Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.</description><subject>Biomass burning</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Economic performance</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electricity generation</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Gas pipelines</subject><subject>Gas transport</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Job creation</subject><subject>Lignite</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Networks</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>Photovoltaics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Return on investment</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><subject>Solar power</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Viability</subject><issn>0301-4215</issn><issn>1873-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjUFuwjAQRa2qSE2hdxipWyLZcRrTbiOq7tiwDjJmCI4Sm3rsSlyiZ65ROQCrkf77_80DK8RKybJRSj2ygksuyroSb0_smWjgnNer97pgv-sRTQzW2HiBHh0GHa13ENGcnB99b5E-oPXTWQdLGfgjTDpisHokSIRLuI76CwSMKWTuwLofpDihi0sY_J7ABPy3aneAdtNR2kPVAU6WKMeUt4dkro0Fmx2zGF9ud85eP9fb9qs8B_-dsnU3-Pwlo10lRNNUSkgp72v9ARhtV_c</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Kis, Zoltán</creator><creator>Pandya, Nikul</creator><creator>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</title><author>Kis, Zoltán ; Pandya, Nikul ; Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21166271333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomass burning</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Economic performance</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electricity generation</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Gas pipelines</topic><topic>Gas transport</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Job creation</topic><topic>Lignite</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Networks</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>Photovoltaics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Return on investment</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><topic>Solar power</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Viability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kis, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Nikul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</creatorcontrib><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kis, Zoltán</au><au>Pandya, Nikul</au><au>Koppelaar, Rembrandt H E M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction</atitle><jtitle>Energy policy</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>144</spage><pages>144-</pages><issn>0301-4215</issn><eissn>1873-6777</eissn><abstract>Shifting to a low-carbon electricity future requires up-to-date information on the energetic, environmental and socio-economic performance of technologies. Here, we present a novel comprehensive bottom-up process chain framework that is applied to 19 electricity generation technologies, consistently incorporating 12 life-cycle phases from extraction to decommissioning. For each life-cycle phase of each technology the following 4 key metrics were assessed: material consumption, energy return ratios, job requirements and greenhouse gas emissions. We also calculate a novel global electricity to grid average for these metrics and present a metric variability analysis by altering transport distance, load factors, efficiency, and fuel density per technology. This work quantitatively supports model-to-policy frameworks that drive technology selection and investment based on energetic-economic viability, job creation and carbon emission reduction of technologies. The results suggest energetic-economic infeasibility of electricity generation networks with substantial shares of: i) liquefied natural gas transport, ii) long distance transport based hard and brown coal and pipeline natural gas, and iii) low-load factor solar-photovoltaic, concentrated solar power, onshore and offshore wind. Direct sector jobs can be expected to double in renewable-majority scenarios. All combustion-powered technologies without natural (biomass) or artificial carbon capture (fossil fuels) are not compatible with a low carbon electricity generation future.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4215
ispartof Energy policy, 2018-09, Vol.120, p.144
issn 0301-4215
1873-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2116627133
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index
subjects Biomass burning
Carbon
Carbon sequestration
Coal
Consumption
Density
Economic performance
Economics
Electricity
Electricity generation
Emissions
Emissions control
Employment
Energy consumption
Energy policy
Extraction
Fossil fuels
Gas pipelines
Gas transport
Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse gases
Job creation
Lignite
Liquefied natural gas
Natural gas
Networks
Offshore operations
Photovoltaics
Power
Return on investment
Socioeconomic factors
Solar energy
Solar power
Technology
Transportation
Variability
Viability
title Electricity generation technologies: Comparison of materials use, energy return on investment, jobs creation and CO^sub 2^ emissions reduction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T10%3A28%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electricity%20generation%20technologies:%20Comparison%20of%20materials%20use,%20energy%20return%20on%20investment,%20jobs%20creation%20and%20CO%5Esub%202%5E%20emissions%20reduction&rft.jtitle=Energy%20policy&rft.au=Kis,%20Zolt%C3%A1n&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=144&rft.pages=144-&rft.issn=0301-4215&rft.eissn=1873-6777&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2116627133%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_21166271333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2116627133&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true