Loading…

Synoptic Control over Orographic Precipitation Distributions during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)

The synoptic controls on orographic precipitation during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX) are investigated using observations and numerical simulations. Observational precipitation retrievals for six warm-frontal (WF), six warm-sector (WS), and six postfrontal (PF) periods indicate that h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Monthly weather review 2018-04, Vol.146 (4), p.1023-1044
Main Authors: Purnell, David J., Kirshbaum, Daniel J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3
container_end_page 1044
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1023
container_title Monthly weather review
container_volume 146
creator Purnell, David J.
Kirshbaum, Daniel J.
description The synoptic controls on orographic precipitation during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX) are investigated using observations and numerical simulations. Observational precipitation retrievals for six warm-frontal (WF), six warm-sector (WS), and six postfrontal (PF) periods indicate that heavy precipitation occurred in both WF and WS periods, but the latter saw larger orographic enhancements. Such enhancements extended well upstream of the terrain in WF periods but were focused over the windward slopes in both PF and WS periods. Quasi-idealized simulations, constrained by OLYMPEX data, reproduce the key synoptic sensitivities of the OLYMPEX precipitation distributions and thus facilitate physical interpretation. These sensitivities are largely explained by three upstream parameters: the large-scale precipitation rate [Formula: see text], the impinging horizontal moisture flux I, and the low-level static stability. Both WF and WS events exhibit large [Formula: see text] and I, and thus, heavy orographic precipitation, which is greatly enhanced in amplitude and areal extent by the seeder–feeder process. However, the stronger stability of the WF periods, particularly within the frontal inversion (even when it lies above crest level), causes their precipitation enhancement to weaken and shift upstream. In contrast, the small [Formula: see text] and I, larger static stability, and absence of stratiform feeder clouds in the nominally unsaturated and convective PF events yield much lighter time- and area-averaged precipitation. Modest enhancements still occur over the windward slopes due to the local development and invigoration of shallow convective showers.
doi_str_mv 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0267.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2117925642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2117925642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1PAyEQxYnRxFo9eyXxogdaYFmQo2nrR9JmGz-ingi7y7Y0dVmBNfa_l6aeJjPvZebND4BLgkeEiHy8eH9GU0QEwpSLETkCA5JTjDCT2TEYYEyTwhk7BWchbDDGnDM6AO5l17ou2gpOXBu920L3YzwsvFt53a3TfOlNZTsbdbSuhVMbordlv28CrHtv2xWMawOL7e6rs1WAC9e3Udukzn474-2XaSO8Luafi-Xs4-YcnDR6G8zFfx2Ct_vZ6-QRzYuHp8ndHFUZwRHRjOVckLrGmnMhRUZKU2c0I5zVxhipdUkaJnIqdV1SLrkpWVOXMr8lTSOTdQiuDns77757E6LauN636aSiCZekeXo_ucYHV-VdCN40qkuBtd8pgtWeqkpU1VQRofZUFcn-AAXYbIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2117925642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Synoptic Control over Orographic Precipitation Distributions during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Purnell, David J. ; Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Purnell, David J. ; Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><description>The synoptic controls on orographic precipitation during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX) are investigated using observations and numerical simulations. Observational precipitation retrievals for six warm-frontal (WF), six warm-sector (WS), and six postfrontal (PF) periods indicate that heavy precipitation occurred in both WF and WS periods, but the latter saw larger orographic enhancements. Such enhancements extended well upstream of the terrain in WF periods but were focused over the windward slopes in both PF and WS periods. Quasi-idealized simulations, constrained by OLYMPEX data, reproduce the key synoptic sensitivities of the OLYMPEX precipitation distributions and thus facilitate physical interpretation. These sensitivities are largely explained by three upstream parameters: the large-scale precipitation rate [Formula: see text], the impinging horizontal moisture flux I, and the low-level static stability. Both WF and WS events exhibit large [Formula: see text] and I, and thus, heavy orographic precipitation, which is greatly enhanced in amplitude and areal extent by the seeder–feeder process. However, the stronger stability of the WF periods, particularly within the frontal inversion (even when it lies above crest level), causes their precipitation enhancement to weaken and shift upstream. In contrast, the small [Formula: see text] and I, larger static stability, and absence of stratiform feeder clouds in the nominally unsaturated and convective PF events yield much lighter time- and area-averaged precipitation. Modest enhancements still occur over the windward slopes due to the local development and invigoration of shallow convective showers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-17-0267.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Climate ; Computer simulation ; Heavy precipitation ; Moisture flux ; Mountains ; Numerical simulations ; Orographic precipitation ; Parameter sensitivity ; Precipitation ; Precipitation rate ; Rain ; Slope ; Slopes ; Static stability ; Upstream ; Vertical stability ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 2018-04, Vol.146 (4), p.1023-1044</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Apr 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Purnell, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><title>Synoptic Control over Orographic Precipitation Distributions during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>The synoptic controls on orographic precipitation during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX) are investigated using observations and numerical simulations. Observational precipitation retrievals for six warm-frontal (WF), six warm-sector (WS), and six postfrontal (PF) periods indicate that heavy precipitation occurred in both WF and WS periods, but the latter saw larger orographic enhancements. Such enhancements extended well upstream of the terrain in WF periods but were focused over the windward slopes in both PF and WS periods. Quasi-idealized simulations, constrained by OLYMPEX data, reproduce the key synoptic sensitivities of the OLYMPEX precipitation distributions and thus facilitate physical interpretation. These sensitivities are largely explained by three upstream parameters: the large-scale precipitation rate [Formula: see text], the impinging horizontal moisture flux I, and the low-level static stability. Both WF and WS events exhibit large [Formula: see text] and I, and thus, heavy orographic precipitation, which is greatly enhanced in amplitude and areal extent by the seeder–feeder process. However, the stronger stability of the WF periods, particularly within the frontal inversion (even when it lies above crest level), causes their precipitation enhancement to weaken and shift upstream. In contrast, the small [Formula: see text] and I, larger static stability, and absence of stratiform feeder clouds in the nominally unsaturated and convective PF events yield much lighter time- and area-averaged precipitation. Modest enhancements still occur over the windward slopes due to the local development and invigoration of shallow convective showers.</description><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Heavy precipitation</subject><subject>Moisture flux</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Orographic precipitation</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Precipitation rate</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Slope</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Static stability</subject><subject>Upstream</subject><subject>Vertical stability</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1PAyEQxYnRxFo9eyXxogdaYFmQo2nrR9JmGz-ingi7y7Y0dVmBNfa_l6aeJjPvZebND4BLgkeEiHy8eH9GU0QEwpSLETkCA5JTjDCT2TEYYEyTwhk7BWchbDDGnDM6AO5l17ou2gpOXBu920L3YzwsvFt53a3TfOlNZTsbdbSuhVMbordlv28CrHtv2xWMawOL7e6rs1WAC9e3Udukzn474-2XaSO8Luafi-Xs4-YcnDR6G8zFfx2Ct_vZ6-QRzYuHp8ndHFUZwRHRjOVckLrGmnMhRUZKU2c0I5zVxhipdUkaJnIqdV1SLrkpWVOXMr8lTSOTdQiuDns77757E6LauN636aSiCZekeXo_ucYHV-VdCN40qkuBtd8pgtWeqkpU1VQRofZUFcn-AAXYbIE</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Purnell, David J.</creator><creator>Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Synoptic Control over Orographic Precipitation Distributions during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)</title><author>Purnell, David J. ; Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Heavy precipitation</topic><topic>Moisture flux</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Orographic precipitation</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Precipitation rate</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Slope</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Static stability</topic><topic>Upstream</topic><topic>Vertical stability</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Purnell, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Purnell, David J.</au><au>Kirshbaum, Daniel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Synoptic Control over Orographic Precipitation Distributions during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1023</spage><epage>1044</epage><pages>1023-1044</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><abstract>The synoptic controls on orographic precipitation during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX) are investigated using observations and numerical simulations. Observational precipitation retrievals for six warm-frontal (WF), six warm-sector (WS), and six postfrontal (PF) periods indicate that heavy precipitation occurred in both WF and WS periods, but the latter saw larger orographic enhancements. Such enhancements extended well upstream of the terrain in WF periods but were focused over the windward slopes in both PF and WS periods. Quasi-idealized simulations, constrained by OLYMPEX data, reproduce the key synoptic sensitivities of the OLYMPEX precipitation distributions and thus facilitate physical interpretation. These sensitivities are largely explained by three upstream parameters: the large-scale precipitation rate [Formula: see text], the impinging horizontal moisture flux I, and the low-level static stability. Both WF and WS events exhibit large [Formula: see text] and I, and thus, heavy orographic precipitation, which is greatly enhanced in amplitude and areal extent by the seeder–feeder process. However, the stronger stability of the WF periods, particularly within the frontal inversion (even when it lies above crest level), causes their precipitation enhancement to weaken and shift upstream. In contrast, the small [Formula: see text] and I, larger static stability, and absence of stratiform feeder clouds in the nominally unsaturated and convective PF events yield much lighter time- and area-averaged precipitation. Modest enhancements still occur over the windward slopes due to the local development and invigoration of shallow convective showers.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/MWR-D-17-0267.1</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-0644
ispartof Monthly weather review, 2018-04, Vol.146 (4), p.1023-1044
issn 0027-0644
1520-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2117925642
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Climate
Computer simulation
Heavy precipitation
Moisture flux
Mountains
Numerical simulations
Orographic precipitation
Parameter sensitivity
Precipitation
Precipitation rate
Rain
Slope
Slopes
Static stability
Upstream
Vertical stability
Weather forecasting
title Synoptic Control over Orographic Precipitation Distributions during the Olympics Mountains Experiment (OLYMPEX)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T21%3A11%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Synoptic%20Control%20over%20Orographic%20Precipitation%20Distributions%20during%20the%20Olympics%20Mountains%20Experiment%20(OLYMPEX)&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=Purnell,%20David%20J.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1023&rft.epage=1044&rft.pages=1023-1044&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/MWR-D-17-0267.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2117925642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-2345671dd0a6679731bed323164deee9aab1f47529adb2696eb4fdb9581ff9ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2117925642&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true