Loading…
The Landscape of Rules Governing Access to Personal Information for Health Research: A View from Afar
Viewing Canada's statutory regime from a greater distance reveals some of the external forces that are potentially influencing the multitude and diversity of legislative approaches to privacy. For the purposes of the present paper, the author explores three possible forces that can help explain...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health law journal 2003-01, p.113 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Health law journal |
container_volume | |
creator | Kosseim, Patricia |
description | Viewing Canada's statutory regime from a greater distance reveals some of the external forces that are potentially influencing the multitude and diversity of legislative approaches to privacy. For the purposes of the present paper, the author explores three possible forces that can help explain, in part, the roughness of our existing statutory landscape. These are: 1) the "top-down pressure" of international legal norms; 2) the "push-pull effect" of federal-provincial division of powers; and 3) the "bottom-up groundswell" of consumer demands. In 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights recognized the right of everyone to enjoy "the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health".49 Accordingly, State Parties undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases" and "the creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness".50 Moreover, this same Covenant recognized the "right of everyone to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications".51 Hence, State Parties also undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the conservation, the development and the diffusion of science", and further undertook "to respect the freedom indispensable for scientific research".52 72 Timothy A. Caulfield & Tim Oiitcrbridge, "DNA Databanks, Public Opinion, and the Law" (2002) 25 Clin. Invest. Med. 256; D. Willison, "Consent-Based Registries: If you build them, who will come?" (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished]; similar conclusions were reached in D. Willison et al., "Patient Consent Preferences for Research Uses of Information in Electronic Medical Records: Interview and Survey Data" (2003) 326 Brit. Med. J., online: British Medical Journal ; E. Holowaty, "Public Attitudes to Non-Consensual Uses of Personal Information for Cancer Screening and Research", (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished]. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212174848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>833528401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2121748483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMsKgkAUQGdRkD3-4dJecFTS2klUBi1CpK0MdicVnWtztX6_Fn1Aq3MWhzMRjpRb342DYDMTc-bG86QXRr4jMK8QLsrcuVQ9AmnIxhYZTvRCa2rzgKQskRkGgitaJqNaOBtNtlNDTQa-BimqdqggQ0Zly2oHCdxqfIO21EGilV2KqVYt4-rHhVgfD_k-dXtLzxF5KBoa7XfNhS99GYVxGAd_RR-ymkRh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212174848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Landscape of Rules Governing Access to Personal Information for Health Research: A View from Afar</title><source>Nexis UK</source><creator>Kosseim, Patricia</creator><creatorcontrib>Kosseim, Patricia</creatorcontrib><description>Viewing Canada's statutory regime from a greater distance reveals some of the external forces that are potentially influencing the multitude and diversity of legislative approaches to privacy. For the purposes of the present paper, the author explores three possible forces that can help explain, in part, the roughness of our existing statutory landscape. These are: 1) the "top-down pressure" of international legal norms; 2) the "push-pull effect" of federal-provincial division of powers; and 3) the "bottom-up groundswell" of consumer demands. In 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights recognized the right of everyone to enjoy "the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health".49 Accordingly, State Parties undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases" and "the creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness".50 Moreover, this same Covenant recognized the "right of everyone to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications".51 Hence, State Parties also undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the conservation, the development and the diffusion of science", and further undertook "to respect the freedom indispensable for scientific research".52 72 Timothy A. Caulfield & Tim Oiitcrbridge, "DNA Databanks, Public Opinion, and the Law" (2002) 25 Clin. Invest. Med. 256; D. Willison, "Consent-Based Registries: If you build them, who will come?" (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished]; similar conclusions were reached in D. Willison et al., "Patient Consent Preferences for Research Uses of Information in Electronic Medical Records: Interview and Survey Data" (2003) 326 Brit. Med. J., online: British Medical Journal ; E. Holowaty, "Public Attitudes to Non-Consensual Uses of Personal Information for Cancer Screening and Research", (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished].</description><identifier>ISSN: 1192-8336</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edmonton: University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</publisher><subject>Electronic health records ; Federal legislation ; Personal information ; Personal Information Protection & Electronic Documents Act-Canada ; Regulation</subject><ispartof>Health law journal, 2003-01, p.113</ispartof><rights>Copyright Health Law Institute 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kosseim, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>The Landscape of Rules Governing Access to Personal Information for Health Research: A View from Afar</title><title>Health law journal</title><description>Viewing Canada's statutory regime from a greater distance reveals some of the external forces that are potentially influencing the multitude and diversity of legislative approaches to privacy. For the purposes of the present paper, the author explores three possible forces that can help explain, in part, the roughness of our existing statutory landscape. These are: 1) the "top-down pressure" of international legal norms; 2) the "push-pull effect" of federal-provincial division of powers; and 3) the "bottom-up groundswell" of consumer demands. In 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights recognized the right of everyone to enjoy "the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health".49 Accordingly, State Parties undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases" and "the creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness".50 Moreover, this same Covenant recognized the "right of everyone to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications".51 Hence, State Parties also undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the conservation, the development and the diffusion of science", and further undertook "to respect the freedom indispensable for scientific research".52 72 Timothy A. Caulfield & Tim Oiitcrbridge, "DNA Databanks, Public Opinion, and the Law" (2002) 25 Clin. Invest. Med. 256; D. Willison, "Consent-Based Registries: If you build them, who will come?" (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished]; similar conclusions were reached in D. Willison et al., "Patient Consent Preferences for Research Uses of Information in Electronic Medical Records: Interview and Survey Data" (2003) 326 Brit. Med. J., online: British Medical Journal ; E. Holowaty, "Public Attitudes to Non-Consensual Uses of Personal Information for Cancer Screening and Research", (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished].</description><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Federal legislation</subject><subject>Personal information</subject><subject>Personal Information Protection & Electronic Documents Act-Canada</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><issn>1192-8336</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMsKgkAUQGdRkD3-4dJecFTS2klUBi1CpK0MdicVnWtztX6_Fn1Aq3MWhzMRjpRb342DYDMTc-bG86QXRr4jMK8QLsrcuVQ9AmnIxhYZTvRCa2rzgKQskRkGgitaJqNaOBtNtlNDTQa-BimqdqggQ0Zly2oHCdxqfIO21EGilV2KqVYt4-rHhVgfD_k-dXtLzxF5KBoa7XfNhS99GYVxGAd_RR-ymkRh</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Kosseim, Patricia</creator><general>University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>The Landscape of Rules Governing Access to Personal Information for Health Research: A View from Afar</title><author>Kosseim, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2121748483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Federal legislation</topic><topic>Personal information</topic><topic>Personal Information Protection & Electronic Documents Act-Canada</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kosseim, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Health law journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kosseim, Patricia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Landscape of Rules Governing Access to Personal Information for Health Research: A View from Afar</atitle><jtitle>Health law journal</jtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><spage>113</spage><pages>113-</pages><issn>1192-8336</issn><abstract>Viewing Canada's statutory regime from a greater distance reveals some of the external forces that are potentially influencing the multitude and diversity of legislative approaches to privacy. For the purposes of the present paper, the author explores three possible forces that can help explain, in part, the roughness of our existing statutory landscape. These are: 1) the "top-down pressure" of international legal norms; 2) the "push-pull effect" of federal-provincial division of powers; and 3) the "bottom-up groundswell" of consumer demands. In 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Cultural and Social Rights recognized the right of everyone to enjoy "the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health".49 Accordingly, State Parties undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the prevention, treatment and control of epidemic, endemic, occupational and other diseases" and "the creation of conditions which would assure to all medical service and medical attention in the event of sickness".50 Moreover, this same Covenant recognized the "right of everyone to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its applications".51 Hence, State Parties also undertook to take steps to achieve the full realization of this right, including those necessary for "the conservation, the development and the diffusion of science", and further undertook "to respect the freedom indispensable for scientific research".52 72 Timothy A. Caulfield & Tim Oiitcrbridge, "DNA Databanks, Public Opinion, and the Law" (2002) 25 Clin. Invest. Med. 256; D. Willison, "Consent-Based Registries: If you build them, who will come?" (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished]; similar conclusions were reached in D. Willison et al., "Patient Consent Preferences for Research Uses of Information in Electronic Medical Records: Interview and Survey Data" (2003) 326 Brit. Med. J., online: British Medical Journal ; E. Holowaty, "Public Attitudes to Non-Consensual Uses of Personal Information for Cancer Screening and Research", (Paper presented to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 14-15 November 2002, Ottawa) [unpublished].</abstract><cop>Edmonton</cop><pub>University of Alberta - Health Law Institute</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1192-8336 |
ispartof | Health law journal, 2003-01, p.113 |
issn | 1192-8336 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212174848 |
source | Nexis UK |
subjects | Electronic health records Federal legislation Personal information Personal Information Protection & Electronic Documents Act-Canada Regulation |
title | The Landscape of Rules Governing Access to Personal Information for Health Research: A View from Afar |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A06%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Landscape%20of%20Rules%20Governing%20Access%20to%20Personal%20Information%20for%20Health%20Research:%20A%20View%20from%20Afar&rft.jtitle=Health%20law%20journal&rft.au=Kosseim,%20Patricia&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.spage=113&rft.pages=113-&rft.issn=1192-8336&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E833528401%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2121748483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212174848&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |