Loading…

Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?

We investigate whether the stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation of the complex Langevin algorithm reproduces the correct expectation values. When the complex Langevin algorithm for an action S(x) is convergent, it produces an equivalent complex probability distribution P(x) which ideall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical review. D 2016-12, Vol.94 (11), Article 114505
Main Author: Salcedo, L. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Physical review. D
container_volume 94
creator Salcedo, L. L.
description We investigate whether the stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation of the complex Langevin algorithm reproduces the correct expectation values. When the complex Langevin algorithm for an action S(x) is convergent, it produces an equivalent complex probability distribution P(x) which ideally would coincide with e−S(x). We show that the projected Fokker-Planck equation fulfilled by P(x) may contain an anomalous term whose form is made explicit. Such a term spoils the relation P(x)=e−S(x), introducing a bias in the expectation values. Through the analysis of several periodic and nonperiodic one-dimensional problems, using either exact or numerical solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation on the complex plane, it is shown that the anomaly is present quite generally. In fact, an anomaly is expected whenever the Langevin walker needs only a finite time to go to infinity and come back, and this is the case for typical actions. We conjecture that the anomaly is the rule rather than the exception in the one-dimensional case; however, this could change as the number of variables involved increases.
doi_str_mv 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114505
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2124767702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2124767702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4MoOOa-gE8BnzsvSdvsnkQ2ncJAEX0OSXtZO7Z2Ju1w397K1Kf7c_z4H_dj7FrAVAhQt6_VMb7RYTHFdFikGWRnbCRTDQmAxPP_LOCSTWLcwBBzQC3EiOlFS5F3FfGi3e239MVXtlnToW74jrqqLfm6PhDvG1fbSCUPFPttF--u2IW320iT3zlmH48P7_OnZPWyfJ7fr5JCCewSmkmFAORlCiXkCuVMQ5FqdFq7bEaImAuXkXR-IJWzhbLOI5L3WSasUGN2c-rdh_azp9iZTduHZjhppBj-yrUGOVDyRBWhjTGQN_tQ72w4GgHmx5H5c2QwNSdH6hvUaFoX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124767702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?</title><source>American Physical Society:Jisc Collections:APS Read and Publish 2023-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Salcedo, L. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salcedo, L. L.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate whether the stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation of the complex Langevin algorithm reproduces the correct expectation values. When the complex Langevin algorithm for an action S(x) is convergent, it produces an equivalent complex probability distribution P(x) which ideally would coincide with e−S(x). We show that the projected Fokker-Planck equation fulfilled by P(x) may contain an anomalous term whose form is made explicit. Such a term spoils the relation P(x)=e−S(x), introducing a bias in the expectation values. Through the analysis of several periodic and nonperiodic one-dimensional problems, using either exact or numerical solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation on the complex plane, it is shown that the anomaly is present quite generally. In fact, an anomaly is expected whenever the Langevin walker needs only a finite time to go to infinity and come back, and this is the case for typical actions. We conjecture that the anomaly is the rule rather than the exception in the one-dimensional case; however, this could change as the number of variables involved increases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2470-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2470-0029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114505</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>College Park: American Physical Society</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Fokker-Planck equation</subject><ispartof>Physical review. D, 2016-12, Vol.94 (11), Article 114505</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Physical Society Dec 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salcedo, L. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?</title><title>Physical review. D</title><description>We investigate whether the stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation of the complex Langevin algorithm reproduces the correct expectation values. When the complex Langevin algorithm for an action S(x) is convergent, it produces an equivalent complex probability distribution P(x) which ideally would coincide with e−S(x). We show that the projected Fokker-Planck equation fulfilled by P(x) may contain an anomalous term whose form is made explicit. Such a term spoils the relation P(x)=e−S(x), introducing a bias in the expectation values. Through the analysis of several periodic and nonperiodic one-dimensional problems, using either exact or numerical solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation on the complex plane, it is shown that the anomaly is present quite generally. In fact, an anomaly is expected whenever the Langevin walker needs only a finite time to go to infinity and come back, and this is the case for typical actions. We conjecture that the anomaly is the rule rather than the exception in the one-dimensional case; however, this could change as the number of variables involved increases.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Fokker-Planck equation</subject><issn>2470-0010</issn><issn>2470-0029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kFFLwzAQx4MoOOa-gE8BnzsvSdvsnkQ2ncJAEX0OSXtZO7Z2Ju1w397K1Kf7c_z4H_dj7FrAVAhQt6_VMb7RYTHFdFikGWRnbCRTDQmAxPP_LOCSTWLcwBBzQC3EiOlFS5F3FfGi3e239MVXtlnToW74jrqqLfm6PhDvG1fbSCUPFPttF--u2IW320iT3zlmH48P7_OnZPWyfJ7fr5JCCewSmkmFAORlCiXkCuVMQ5FqdFq7bEaImAuXkXR-IJWzhbLOI5L3WSasUGN2c-rdh_azp9iZTduHZjhppBj-yrUGOVDyRBWhjTGQN_tQ72w4GgHmx5H5c2QwNSdH6hvUaFoX</recordid><startdate>20161208</startdate><enddate>20161208</enddate><creator>Salcedo, L. L.</creator><general>American Physical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161208</creationdate><title>Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?</title><author>Salcedo, L. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Fokker-Planck equation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salcedo, L. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salcedo, L. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?</atitle><jtitle>Physical review. D</jtitle><date>2016-12-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>11</issue><artnum>114505</artnum><issn>2470-0010</issn><eissn>2470-0029</eissn><abstract>We investigate whether the stationary solution of the Fokker-Planck equation of the complex Langevin algorithm reproduces the correct expectation values. When the complex Langevin algorithm for an action S(x) is convergent, it produces an equivalent complex probability distribution P(x) which ideally would coincide with e−S(x). We show that the projected Fokker-Planck equation fulfilled by P(x) may contain an anomalous term whose form is made explicit. Such a term spoils the relation P(x)=e−S(x), introducing a bias in the expectation values. Through the analysis of several periodic and nonperiodic one-dimensional problems, using either exact or numerical solutions of the Fokker-Planck equation on the complex plane, it is shown that the anomaly is present quite generally. In fact, an anomaly is expected whenever the Langevin walker needs only a finite time to go to infinity and come back, and this is the case for typical actions. We conjecture that the anomaly is the rule rather than the exception in the one-dimensional case; however, this could change as the number of variables involved increases.</abstract><cop>College Park</cop><pub>American Physical Society</pub><doi>10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114505</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2470-0010
ispartof Physical review. D, 2016-12, Vol.94 (11), Article 114505
issn 2470-0010
2470-0029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2124767702
source American Physical Society:Jisc Collections:APS Read and Publish 2023-2025 (reading list)
subjects Algorithms
Fokker-Planck equation
title Does the complex Langevin method give unbiased results?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A06%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20complex%20Langevin%20method%20give%20unbiased%20results?&rft.jtitle=Physical%20review.%20D&rft.au=Salcedo,%20L.%E2%80%89L.&rft.date=2016-12-08&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=11&rft.artnum=114505&rft.issn=2470-0010&rft.eissn=2470-0029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114505&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2124767702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-e823900ef240d06392870c479b77b58e99961b5e2bf8233bac3abf99eff551a13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124767702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true