Understanding the captivity effect on invertebrate communities transplanted into an experimental stream laboratory

• Published in: Environmental toxicology and chemistry 2018-11, Vol.37 (11), p.2820-2834
• Main Authors: Schmidt, Travis S, Rogers, Holly A, Miller, Janet L, Mebane, Christopher A, Balistrieri, Laurie S
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Aquatic insects; Body Size; Captivity; Communities; Creeks & streams; Ecosystem; Emergence; Ephemeroptera - anatomy & histology; Ephemeroptera - physiology; Invertebrates; Invertebrates - anatomy & histology; Invertebrates - physiology; Laboratories; Larva - anatomy & histology; Larva - physiology; Larvae; Life cycle analysis; Life cycle engineering; Life cycles; Life history; Macroinvertebrates; Mesocosms; Natural streams; Population studies; Populations; Public domain; Pupa - physiology; Pupation; Reproducibility; Rivers; Rivers - chemistry; Simuliidae; Streams; Substrates; Test procedures; Water sampling
• ISSN: 0730-7268; 1552-8618
• DOI: 10.1002/etc.4237

Little is known about how design and testing methodologies affect the macroinvertebrate communities that are held captive in mesocosms. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a 32-d test to determine how seeded invertebrate communities changed once removed from the natural stream and introduced to the laboratory. We evaluated larvae survival and adult emergence in controls from 4 subsequent studies, as well as corresponding within-river community changes. The experimental streams maintained about 80% of the invertebrates that originally colonized the introduced substrates. Many macroinvertebrate populations experienced changes in numbers through time, suggesting that these taxa are unlikely to maintain static populations throughout studies. For example, some taxa (Tanytarsini, Simuliidae, Cinygmula sp.) increased in number, grew (Simuliidae), and possibly recruited new individuals (Baetidae) as larvae, while several also completed other life history events (pupation and emergence) during the 30- to 32-d studies. Midges and mayflies dominated emergence, further supporting the idea that conditions are conducive for many taxa to complete their life cycles while held captive in the experimental streams. However, plecopterans were sensitive to temperature changes >2 °C between river and laboratory. Thus, this experimental stream testing approach can support diverse larval macroinvertebrate communities for durations consistent with some chronic criterion development and life cycle assessments (i.e., 30 d). The changes in communities held captive in the experimental streams were mostly consistent with the parallel changes observed from in situ river samples, indicating that mesocosm results are reasonably representative of real river insect communities. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2820-2834. Published 2018 Wiley Periodicals Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.