Loading…
Contrasting toxic-endophyte contamination between endophyte-free and nontoxic-endophyte tall fescue pastures
The fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams is abundant in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and one strategy to alleviate detrimental effects on livestock is to plant endophyte-free cultivars; however, these pastures frequently become recontaminated by toxic-endophy...
Saved in:
Published in: | Crop science 2005-03, Vol.45 (2), p.616-625 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083 |
container_end_page | 625 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 616 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Barker, D.J Sulc, R.M Bultemeier, T.L McCormick, J.S Little, R Penrose, C.D Samples, D |
description | The fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams is abundant in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and one strategy to alleviate detrimental effects on livestock is to plant endophyte-free cultivars; however, these pastures frequently become recontaminated by toxic-endophyte tall fescue. An alternative strategy is to use pastures of tall fescue infected with endophyte that does not produce toxic alkaloids. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that nontoxic-endophyte infected tall fescue swards (Nontoxic-E) were more resistant to reinfestation by volunteer tall fescue and its associated toxic endophyte, than endophyte-free tall fescue swards (E-). Plots of E- and Nontoxic-E tall fescue (cultivar Jesup) with six levels of contamination by endophyte-infected K31 (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50% of viable seed weight) were established from seed at three sites in Ohio during April 2001. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Jackson site were 77, 118, and 143% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Belle Valley site were 32, 70, and 39% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the South Charleston site averaged 8% less than expected. Observed endophyte levels in Nontoxic-E at all sites were consistent with the endophyte levels in the seed that was planted, and plants had a negligible concentration of ergopeptine alkaloids. It was concluded that, where mechanisms for contamination exist, E- tall fescue stands can be readily contaminated by volunteer tall fescue and its toxic endophyte; but, Nontoxic-E tall fescue is less susceptible to contamination by volunteer tall fescue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2135/cropsci2005.0616 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212632738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A130975933</galeid><sourcerecordid>A130975933</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUc-L1DAULqLguHr3ZhE8dnxpmrQ9DsXVhYUVZwVv4TV9GbN0kjHpsM5_b0qHdZEFySHw3veL92XZWwbrknHxUQd_iNqWAGINksln2YpVXBQgBX-erQAYK1jDf7zMXsV4BwB1W4tVNnbeTQHjZN0un_xvqwtygz_8PE2U67TDvXU4We_ynqZ7Ipc_7AsTiHJ0Q-4S8B_uhOOYG4r6SPkh6R8DxdfZC4NjpDfn_yK7vfx0230prm8-X3Wb60JXopWFbktO1LfCIAhtet2irCqNtTZNbTRVfUWkYRBQcepRcNEPTGqBfJAGGn6RvV9kD8H_OlKc1J0_BpccVclKycuaz6BiAe1wJGWd8ekMekeOAo7ekbFpvGEc0plazhN-_QQ-vYH2Vj9JgIWQmokxkFGHYPcYToqBmitTjypTc2WJ8uEcHKPG0QR02sa_PCl5U7M5-2bB3SfP0391Vbftyu7bzddtdzUPz17vFg2DXuEuJJ_v2xJSfmib1ILgfwAgqLiv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212632738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting toxic-endophyte contamination between endophyte-free and nontoxic-endophyte tall fescue pastures</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Barker, D.J ; Sulc, R.M ; Bultemeier, T.L ; McCormick, J.S ; Little, R ; Penrose, C.D ; Samples, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.J ; Sulc, R.M ; Bultemeier, T.L ; McCormick, J.S ; Little, R ; Penrose, C.D ; Samples, D</creatorcontrib><description>The fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams is abundant in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and one strategy to alleviate detrimental effects on livestock is to plant endophyte-free cultivars; however, these pastures frequently become recontaminated by toxic-endophyte tall fescue. An alternative strategy is to use pastures of tall fescue infected with endophyte that does not produce toxic alkaloids. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that nontoxic-endophyte infected tall fescue swards (Nontoxic-E) were more resistant to reinfestation by volunteer tall fescue and its associated toxic endophyte, than endophyte-free tall fescue swards (E-). Plots of E- and Nontoxic-E tall fescue (cultivar Jesup) with six levels of contamination by endophyte-infected K31 (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50% of viable seed weight) were established from seed at three sites in Ohio during April 2001. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Jackson site were 77, 118, and 143% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Belle Valley site were 32, 70, and 39% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the South Charleston site averaged 8% less than expected. Observed endophyte levels in Nontoxic-E at all sites were consistent with the endophyte levels in the seed that was planted, and plants had a negligible concentration of ergopeptine alkaloids. It was concluded that, where mechanisms for contamination exist, E- tall fescue stands can be readily contaminated by volunteer tall fescue and its toxic endophyte; but, Nontoxic-E tall fescue is less susceptible to contamination by volunteer tall fescue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0616</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CRPSAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>alkaloids ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Autumn ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contamination ; Cultivars ; Diseases and pests ; ecological invasion ; endophytes ; Festuca arundinacea ; Foraging ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Livestock ; Microbial ecology ; Microflora of plants ; mycotoxins ; Neotyphodium coenophialum ; Pasture ; pastures ; Spring ; Statistics ; Sward ; Tall fescue ; Toxicity ; volunteer plants</subject><ispartof>Crop science, 2005-03, Vol.45 (2), p.616-625</ispartof><rights>Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2005 Crop Science Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Mar/Apr 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16638718$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulc, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bultemeier, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penrose, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samples, D</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting toxic-endophyte contamination between endophyte-free and nontoxic-endophyte tall fescue pastures</title><title>Crop science</title><description>The fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams is abundant in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and one strategy to alleviate detrimental effects on livestock is to plant endophyte-free cultivars; however, these pastures frequently become recontaminated by toxic-endophyte tall fescue. An alternative strategy is to use pastures of tall fescue infected with endophyte that does not produce toxic alkaloids. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that nontoxic-endophyte infected tall fescue swards (Nontoxic-E) were more resistant to reinfestation by volunteer tall fescue and its associated toxic endophyte, than endophyte-free tall fescue swards (E-). Plots of E- and Nontoxic-E tall fescue (cultivar Jesup) with six levels of contamination by endophyte-infected K31 (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50% of viable seed weight) were established from seed at three sites in Ohio during April 2001. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Jackson site were 77, 118, and 143% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Belle Valley site were 32, 70, and 39% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the South Charleston site averaged 8% less than expected. Observed endophyte levels in Nontoxic-E at all sites were consistent with the endophyte levels in the seed that was planted, and plants had a negligible concentration of ergopeptine alkaloids. It was concluded that, where mechanisms for contamination exist, E- tall fescue stands can be readily contaminated by volunteer tall fescue and its toxic endophyte; but, Nontoxic-E tall fescue is less susceptible to contamination by volunteer tall fescue.</description><subject>alkaloids</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Autumn</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Diseases and pests</subject><subject>ecological invasion</subject><subject>endophytes</subject><subject>Festuca arundinacea</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Microbial ecology</subject><subject>Microflora of plants</subject><subject>mycotoxins</subject><subject>Neotyphodium coenophialum</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>pastures</subject><subject>Spring</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Sward</subject><subject>Tall fescue</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>volunteer plants</subject><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUc-L1DAULqLguHr3ZhE8dnxpmrQ9DsXVhYUVZwVv4TV9GbN0kjHpsM5_b0qHdZEFySHw3veL92XZWwbrknHxUQd_iNqWAGINksln2YpVXBQgBX-erQAYK1jDf7zMXsV4BwB1W4tVNnbeTQHjZN0un_xvqwtygz_8PE2U67TDvXU4We_ynqZ7Ipc_7AsTiHJ0Q-4S8B_uhOOYG4r6SPkh6R8DxdfZC4NjpDfn_yK7vfx0230prm8-X3Wb60JXopWFbktO1LfCIAhtet2irCqNtTZNbTRVfUWkYRBQcepRcNEPTGqBfJAGGn6RvV9kD8H_OlKc1J0_BpccVclKycuaz6BiAe1wJGWd8ekMekeOAo7ekbFpvGEc0plazhN-_QQ-vYH2Vj9JgIWQmokxkFGHYPcYToqBmitTjypTc2WJ8uEcHKPG0QR02sa_PCl5U7M5-2bB3SfP0391Vbftyu7bzddtdzUPz17vFg2DXuEuJJ_v2xJSfmib1ILgfwAgqLiv</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Barker, D.J</creator><creator>Sulc, R.M</creator><creator>Bultemeier, T.L</creator><creator>McCormick, J.S</creator><creator>Little, R</creator><creator>Penrose, C.D</creator><creator>Samples, D</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Contrasting toxic-endophyte contamination between endophyte-free and nontoxic-endophyte tall fescue pastures</title><author>Barker, D.J ; Sulc, R.M ; Bultemeier, T.L ; McCormick, J.S ; Little, R ; Penrose, C.D ; Samples, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>alkaloids</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Autumn</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Diseases and pests</topic><topic>ecological invasion</topic><topic>endophytes</topic><topic>Festuca arundinacea</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Microbial ecology</topic><topic>Microflora of plants</topic><topic>mycotoxins</topic><topic>Neotyphodium coenophialum</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>pastures</topic><topic>Spring</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Sward</topic><topic>Tall fescue</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>volunteer plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barker, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sulc, R.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bultemeier, T.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, J.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penrose, C.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samples, D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barker, D.J</au><au>Sulc, R.M</au><au>Bultemeier, T.L</au><au>McCormick, J.S</au><au>Little, R</au><au>Penrose, C.D</au><au>Samples, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting toxic-endophyte contamination between endophyte-free and nontoxic-endophyte tall fescue pastures</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>616</spage><epage>625</epage><pages>616-625</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><coden>CRPSAY</coden><abstract>The fungal endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum Morgan-Jones and Gams is abundant in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and one strategy to alleviate detrimental effects on livestock is to plant endophyte-free cultivars; however, these pastures frequently become recontaminated by toxic-endophyte tall fescue. An alternative strategy is to use pastures of tall fescue infected with endophyte that does not produce toxic alkaloids. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that nontoxic-endophyte infected tall fescue swards (Nontoxic-E) were more resistant to reinfestation by volunteer tall fescue and its associated toxic endophyte, than endophyte-free tall fescue swards (E-). Plots of E- and Nontoxic-E tall fescue (cultivar Jesup) with six levels of contamination by endophyte-infected K31 (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50% of viable seed weight) were established from seed at three sites in Ohio during April 2001. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Jackson site were 77, 118, and 143% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the Belle Valley site were 32, 70, and 39% greater than expected in autumn 2001, spring 2002, and autumn 2002, respectively. Observed endophyte levels for E- at the South Charleston site averaged 8% less than expected. Observed endophyte levels in Nontoxic-E at all sites were consistent with the endophyte levels in the seed that was planted, and plants had a negligible concentration of ergopeptine alkaloids. It was concluded that, where mechanisms for contamination exist, E- tall fescue stands can be readily contaminated by volunteer tall fescue and its toxic endophyte; but, Nontoxic-E tall fescue is less susceptible to contamination by volunteer tall fescue.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.2135/cropsci2005.0616</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-183X |
ispartof | Crop science, 2005-03, Vol.45 (2), p.616-625 |
issn | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212632738 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | alkaloids Animal, plant and microbial ecology Autumn Biological and medical sciences Contamination Cultivars Diseases and pests ecological invasion endophytes Festuca arundinacea Foraging Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasses Livestock Microbial ecology Microflora of plants mycotoxins Neotyphodium coenophialum Pasture pastures Spring Statistics Sward Tall fescue Toxicity volunteer plants |
title | Contrasting toxic-endophyte contamination between endophyte-free and nontoxic-endophyte tall fescue pastures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A48%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20toxic-endophyte%20contamination%20between%20endophyte-free%20and%20nontoxic-endophyte%20tall%20fescue%20pastures&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Barker,%20D.J&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=616&rft.epage=625&rft.pages=616-625&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft.coden=CRPSAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2135/cropsci2005.0616&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA130975933%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4596-c923eeb95fa05cfbc9a644ca7cf87fce4b4eec0d5043eba535bd16c5a3d6f083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212632738&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A130975933&rfr_iscdi=true |