Loading…
Long-term outcome of patients treated with repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after failure of gamma-brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis
Although (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the recurrence of in-stent restenosis, up to 24% of these patients will still require repeat target-vessel revascularization. The short- and long-term outcomes of repeat percutaneous intervention in this popula...
Saved in:
Published in: | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2002-10, Vol.106 (18), p.2340-2345 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3 |
container_end_page | 2345 |
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 2340 |
container_title | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Prpic, Ross Teirstein, Paul S Reilly, John P Moses, Jeffrey W Tripuraneni, Prabhakar Lansky, Alexandra J Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony Jani, Shirish Wong, S Chiu Fish, R David Ellis, Stephen Holmes, David R Kereiakas, Dean Kuntz, Richard E Leon, Martin B |
description | Although (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the recurrence of in-stent restenosis, up to 24% of these patients will still require repeat target-vessel revascularization. The short- and long-term outcomes of repeat percutaneous intervention in this population have not been characterized.
Analysis was performed of all patients enrolled in the GAMMA-I and GAMMA-II brachytherapy trials who underwent repeat percutaneous target lesion revascularization (TLR) because of restenosis. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: those who had received (192)Ir brachytherapy and those randomized to placebo. Forty-five (17.6%) of a total of 256 patients whose index treatment was intracoronary radiation therapy and 36 (29.8%) of 121 patients whose index treatment was placebo required repeat percutaneous TLR. The mean time to this first TLR was 295+/-206 days in the irradiated group and 202+/-167 days in the placebo group (P=0.03). Acute procedural success occurred in 100% of irradiated patients and 94% of placebo controls (P=0.19). After the first TLR, a subsequent TLR was required in 15 (33.3%) of 45 brachytherapy patients versus 17 (47.2%) of 36 placebo failure patients (P=0.26). There was no significant difference in time to second TLR between the 2 groups. Other long-term major adverse event rates in both groups were comparable to those of other contemporary angioplasty/stenting series.
In those patients who "fail" (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis, treatment with (192)Ir delays the time to first TLR. Additionally, repeat percutaneous intervention in these patients is safe and efficacious in the short term, with acceptable long-term results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.CIR.0000036366.62288.74 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_212675542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>235493341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUVtLwzAUDqLonP4FCXtvbS5NG99keBkMBNHnkKWnW4dtapIq-zv-UtNtsLyc85HvAudDaEaylBBB7jOSzhfvaTY-JpgQqaC0LNOCn6EJySlPeM7kOZrEf5kUjNIrdO39NkLBivwSXRHKo1LwCfpb2m6dBHAttkMwtgVsa9zr0EAXPA4OdIAK_zZhgx30EeEenBmC7sAOHhvrbKfdDjddNPmJosZ2WNcR4Fo3X4PbG6512-pk5bTZ7MIGnO53uLYOx_2Q0UblSGy6xIdxdzBO6xt_gy5q_eXh9jin6PP56WP-mizfXhbzx2VimOQh0RWrpdbSiLiJFc04M0ISXRFpTC0p5GVWMskqA0QXIEzJ8oLmVUnKTFIGbIpmB9_e2e8hxqutHVwXIxUlVBR5zmkkPRxIxlnvHdSqd00bD6BIpsZ2VEZUbEed2lH7dlTBo_jumDCsWqhO0mMd7B_6RZAo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>212675542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term outcome of patients treated with repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after failure of gamma-brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis</title><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Prpic, Ross ; Teirstein, Paul S ; Reilly, John P ; Moses, Jeffrey W ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Lansky, Alexandra J ; Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony ; Jani, Shirish ; Wong, S Chiu ; Fish, R David ; Ellis, Stephen ; Holmes, David R ; Kereiakas, Dean ; Kuntz, Richard E ; Leon, Martin B</creator><creatorcontrib>Prpic, Ross ; Teirstein, Paul S ; Reilly, John P ; Moses, Jeffrey W ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Lansky, Alexandra J ; Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony ; Jani, Shirish ; Wong, S Chiu ; Fish, R David ; Ellis, Stephen ; Holmes, David R ; Kereiakas, Dean ; Kuntz, Richard E ; Leon, Martin B</creatorcontrib><description>Although (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the recurrence of in-stent restenosis, up to 24% of these patients will still require repeat target-vessel revascularization. The short- and long-term outcomes of repeat percutaneous intervention in this population have not been characterized.
Analysis was performed of all patients enrolled in the GAMMA-I and GAMMA-II brachytherapy trials who underwent repeat percutaneous target lesion revascularization (TLR) because of restenosis. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: those who had received (192)Ir brachytherapy and those randomized to placebo. Forty-five (17.6%) of a total of 256 patients whose index treatment was intracoronary radiation therapy and 36 (29.8%) of 121 patients whose index treatment was placebo required repeat percutaneous TLR. The mean time to this first TLR was 295+/-206 days in the irradiated group and 202+/-167 days in the placebo group (P=0.03). Acute procedural success occurred in 100% of irradiated patients and 94% of placebo controls (P=0.19). After the first TLR, a subsequent TLR was required in 15 (33.3%) of 45 brachytherapy patients versus 17 (47.2%) of 36 placebo failure patients (P=0.26). There was no significant difference in time to second TLR between the 2 groups. Other long-term major adverse event rates in both groups were comparable to those of other contemporary angioplasty/stenting series.
In those patients who "fail" (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis, treatment with (192)Ir delays the time to first TLR. Additionally, repeat percutaneous intervention in these patients is safe and efficacious in the short term, with acceptable long-term results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000036366.62288.74</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12403664</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Heart Association, Inc</publisher><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects ; Brachytherapy - adverse effects ; Cohort Studies ; Coronary Restenosis - radiotherapy ; Coronary Restenosis - surgery ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Iridium Radioisotopes - adverse effects ; Iridium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Stents - adverse effects ; Time ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2002-10, Vol.106 (18), p.2340-2345</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Heart Association, Inc. Oct 29 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12403664$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prpic, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teirstein, Paul S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, Jeffrey W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansky, Alexandra J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jani, Shirish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, S Chiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fish, R David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kereiakas, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuntz, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon, Martin B</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term outcome of patients treated with repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after failure of gamma-brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Although (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the recurrence of in-stent restenosis, up to 24% of these patients will still require repeat target-vessel revascularization. The short- and long-term outcomes of repeat percutaneous intervention in this population have not been characterized.
Analysis was performed of all patients enrolled in the GAMMA-I and GAMMA-II brachytherapy trials who underwent repeat percutaneous target lesion revascularization (TLR) because of restenosis. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: those who had received (192)Ir brachytherapy and those randomized to placebo. Forty-five (17.6%) of a total of 256 patients whose index treatment was intracoronary radiation therapy and 36 (29.8%) of 121 patients whose index treatment was placebo required repeat percutaneous TLR. The mean time to this first TLR was 295+/-206 days in the irradiated group and 202+/-167 days in the placebo group (P=0.03). Acute procedural success occurred in 100% of irradiated patients and 94% of placebo controls (P=0.19). After the first TLR, a subsequent TLR was required in 15 (33.3%) of 45 brachytherapy patients versus 17 (47.2%) of 36 placebo failure patients (P=0.26). There was no significant difference in time to second TLR between the 2 groups. Other long-term major adverse event rates in both groups were comparable to those of other contemporary angioplasty/stenting series.
In those patients who "fail" (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis, treatment with (192)Ir delays the time to first TLR. Additionally, repeat percutaneous intervention in these patients is safe and efficacious in the short term, with acceptable long-term results.</description><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Coronary Restenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iridium Radioisotopes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Iridium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Stents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFUVtLwzAUDqLonP4FCXtvbS5NG99keBkMBNHnkKWnW4dtapIq-zv-UtNtsLyc85HvAudDaEaylBBB7jOSzhfvaTY-JpgQqaC0LNOCn6EJySlPeM7kOZrEf5kUjNIrdO39NkLBivwSXRHKo1LwCfpb2m6dBHAttkMwtgVsa9zr0EAXPA4OdIAK_zZhgx30EeEenBmC7sAOHhvrbKfdDjddNPmJosZ2WNcR4Fo3X4PbG6512-pk5bTZ7MIGnO53uLYOx_2Q0UblSGy6xIdxdzBO6xt_gy5q_eXh9jin6PP56WP-mizfXhbzx2VimOQh0RWrpdbSiLiJFc04M0ISXRFpTC0p5GVWMskqA0QXIEzJ8oLmVUnKTFIGbIpmB9_e2e8hxqutHVwXIxUlVBR5zmkkPRxIxlnvHdSqd00bD6BIpsZ2VEZUbEed2lH7dlTBo_jumDCsWqhO0mMd7B_6RZAo</recordid><startdate>20021029</startdate><enddate>20021029</enddate><creator>Prpic, Ross</creator><creator>Teirstein, Paul S</creator><creator>Reilly, John P</creator><creator>Moses, Jeffrey W</creator><creator>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</creator><creator>Lansky, Alexandra J</creator><creator>Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony</creator><creator>Jani, Shirish</creator><creator>Wong, S Chiu</creator><creator>Fish, R David</creator><creator>Ellis, Stephen</creator><creator>Holmes, David R</creator><creator>Kereiakas, Dean</creator><creator>Kuntz, Richard E</creator><creator>Leon, Martin B</creator><general>American Heart Association, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021029</creationdate><title>Long-term outcome of patients treated with repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after failure of gamma-brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis</title><author>Prpic, Ross ; Teirstein, Paul S ; Reilly, John P ; Moses, Jeffrey W ; Tripuraneni, Prabhakar ; Lansky, Alexandra J ; Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony ; Jani, Shirish ; Wong, S Chiu ; Fish, R David ; Ellis, Stephen ; Holmes, David R ; Kereiakas, Dean ; Kuntz, Richard E ; Leon, Martin B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Coronary Restenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iridium Radioisotopes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Iridium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Stents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prpic, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teirstein, Paul S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reilly, John P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moses, Jeffrey W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansky, Alexandra J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jani, Shirish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, S Chiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fish, R David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kereiakas, Dean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuntz, Richard E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon, Martin B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prpic, Ross</au><au>Teirstein, Paul S</au><au>Reilly, John P</au><au>Moses, Jeffrey W</au><au>Tripuraneni, Prabhakar</au><au>Lansky, Alexandra J</au><au>Giorgianni, Joseph-Anthony</au><au>Jani, Shirish</au><au>Wong, S Chiu</au><au>Fish, R David</au><au>Ellis, Stephen</au><au>Holmes, David R</au><au>Kereiakas, Dean</au><au>Kuntz, Richard E</au><au>Leon, Martin B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term outcome of patients treated with repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after failure of gamma-brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>2002-10-29</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>2340</spage><epage>2345</epage><pages>2340-2345</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>Although (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy has been demonstrated to dramatically reduce the recurrence of in-stent restenosis, up to 24% of these patients will still require repeat target-vessel revascularization. The short- and long-term outcomes of repeat percutaneous intervention in this population have not been characterized.
Analysis was performed of all patients enrolled in the GAMMA-I and GAMMA-II brachytherapy trials who underwent repeat percutaneous target lesion revascularization (TLR) because of restenosis. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts: those who had received (192)Ir brachytherapy and those randomized to placebo. Forty-five (17.6%) of a total of 256 patients whose index treatment was intracoronary radiation therapy and 36 (29.8%) of 121 patients whose index treatment was placebo required repeat percutaneous TLR. The mean time to this first TLR was 295+/-206 days in the irradiated group and 202+/-167 days in the placebo group (P=0.03). Acute procedural success occurred in 100% of irradiated patients and 94% of placebo controls (P=0.19). After the first TLR, a subsequent TLR was required in 15 (33.3%) of 45 brachytherapy patients versus 17 (47.2%) of 36 placebo failure patients (P=0.26). There was no significant difference in time to second TLR between the 2 groups. Other long-term major adverse event rates in both groups were comparable to those of other contemporary angioplasty/stenting series.
In those patients who "fail" (192)Ir intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis, treatment with (192)Ir delays the time to first TLR. Additionally, repeat percutaneous intervention in these patients is safe and efficacious in the short term, with acceptable long-term results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Heart Association, Inc</pub><pmid>12403664</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.CIR.0000036366.62288.74</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7322 |
ispartof | Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 2002-10, Vol.106 (18), p.2340-2345 |
issn | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_212675542 |
source | EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects Brachytherapy - adverse effects Cohort Studies Coronary Restenosis - radiotherapy Coronary Restenosis - surgery Disease-Free Survival Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Iridium Radioisotopes - adverse effects Iridium Radioisotopes - therapeutic use Male Middle Aged Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - statistics & numerical data Recurrence Reoperation Stents - adverse effects Time Treatment Outcome |
title | Long-term outcome of patients treated with repeat percutaneous coronary intervention after failure of gamma-brachytherapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A28%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20outcome%20of%20patients%20treated%20with%20repeat%20percutaneous%20coronary%20intervention%20after%20failure%20of%20gamma-brachytherapy%20for%20the%20treatment%20of%20in-stent%20restenosis&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Prpic,%20Ross&rft.date=2002-10-29&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=2340&rft.epage=2345&rft.pages=2340-2345&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.CIR.0000036366.62288.74&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E235493341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ad3f9aa9c6ad36b2043c691ad19ccf92e5808393dce1a7e6c835725d8180923e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=212675542&rft_id=info:pmid/12403664&rfr_iscdi=true |