Loading…

Comparison of anatomic isthmus block with the modified right atrial maze procedure for late atrial tachycardia in Fontan patients

Late atrial reentry tachycardia (AT) after Fontan repair is common, with limited efficacy of medical therapy in preventing AT recurrence. In this study, two approaches to surgical arrhythmia ablation in patients with refractory AT undergoing Fontan revision are compared: cryoablation of the inferome...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2002-07, Vol.106 (5), p.575-579
Main Authors: DEAL, Barbara J, MAVROUDIS, Constantine, BACKER, Carl L, BUCK, Scott H, JOHNSRUDE, Christopher
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Late atrial reentry tachycardia (AT) after Fontan repair is common, with limited efficacy of medical therapy in preventing AT recurrence. In this study, two approaches to surgical arrhythmia ablation in patients with refractory AT undergoing Fontan revision are compared: cryoablation of the inferomedial right atrium (RA), and a more extensive modified RA maze procedure designed to eliminate all potential RA reentrant circuits. Fontan revision was performed in 23 patients with AT, using inferomedial RA cryoablation (Group 1, n=8) and modified RA maze procedure (Group 2, n=15). There was no difference in age at initial Fontan, age at Fontan revision, age at onset of AT, or number of failed antiarrhythmic medications. Patients underwent preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative electrophysiological studies. Thirty-eight different tachycardia circuits were induced in preoperative studies with 3 major areas of RA involvement: the lower lateral RA, the atrial septum, and the inferomedial RA. At postoperative electrophysiological study, AT was inducible in 62% of Group 1 patients but only 7% of Group 2 patients (P
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/01.CIR.0000025876.82336.26