Loading…

Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer

Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2018-10, Vol.124 (4), p.434-442
Main Authors: Lafontaine, Scott R., Shellhammer, Thomas H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03
container_end_page 442
container_issue 4
container_start_page 434
container_title Journal of the Institute of Brewing
container_volume 124
creator Lafontaine, Scott R.
Shellhammer, Thomas H.
description Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jib.517
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130200482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2130200482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI7iKwRcuJCON0mTZpY6-FMZEETXIU0Tp0OnqUkH6c5H8Bl9EjOMWxeXu_k4nPMhdE5gRgDo9bqpZpwUB2hCgUMGORGHaAKQi2xecDhGJzGuAXhOCZ-gl3LTazNg73Ac9NAYXIfx5-t75fu-6d5x0IPFvsPDyuJou-jDiHVXp9PtmHDd4j5417Q27jIqa8MpOnK6jfbs70_R2_3d6-IxWz4_lIubZWYYpUXGWCFyDlCLilCumRSVEAwMkxVQbhypK-4ktZxJKYikdE6IkZyJ2hFuHbAputjnpgIfWxsHtfbbkHpFRQkDmiZLmqjLPWWCjzFYp_rQbHQYFQG1E6aSMJWEJfJqT36mNeN_mHoqb3f0L_Zzaog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130200482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Lafontaine, Scott R. ; Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Scott R. ; Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><description>Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-9750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jib.517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</publisher><subject>Aroma ; Beer ; Brewing ; Distillation ; dry‐hopping rate ; Flavor ; hop aroma ; hop chemistry ; hop extraction efficiency ; hop sensory ; Mathematical analysis ; Qualitative analysis ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory properties ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 2018-10, Vol.124 (4), p.434-442</ispartof><rights>2018 The Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4055-2366 ; 0000-0003-4098-7711</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjib.517$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjib.517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Scott R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</title><title>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</title><description>Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</description><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Beer</subject><subject>Brewing</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>dry‐hopping rate</subject><subject>Flavor</subject><subject>hop aroma</subject><subject>hop chemistry</subject><subject>hop extraction efficiency</subject><subject>hop sensory</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>0046-9750</issn><issn>2050-0416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI7iKwRcuJCON0mTZpY6-FMZEETXIU0Tp0OnqUkH6c5H8Bl9EjOMWxeXu_k4nPMhdE5gRgDo9bqpZpwUB2hCgUMGORGHaAKQi2xecDhGJzGuAXhOCZ-gl3LTazNg73Ac9NAYXIfx5-t75fu-6d5x0IPFvsPDyuJou-jDiHVXp9PtmHDd4j5417Q27jIqa8MpOnK6jfbs70_R2_3d6-IxWz4_lIubZWYYpUXGWCFyDlCLilCumRSVEAwMkxVQbhypK-4ktZxJKYikdE6IkZyJ2hFuHbAputjnpgIfWxsHtfbbkHpFRQkDmiZLmqjLPWWCjzFYp_rQbHQYFQG1E6aSMJWEJfJqT36mNeN_mHoqb3f0L_Zzaog</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Lafontaine, Scott R.</creator><creator>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creator><general>Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-2366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7711</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</title><author>Lafontaine, Scott R. ; Shellhammer, Thomas H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Beer</topic><topic>Brewing</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>dry‐hopping rate</topic><topic>Flavor</topic><topic>hop aroma</topic><topic>hop chemistry</topic><topic>hop extraction efficiency</topic><topic>hop sensory</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Scott R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lafontaine, Scott R.</au><au>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</jtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>434</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>434-442</pages><issn>0046-9750</issn><eissn>2050-0416</eissn><abstract>Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Institute of Brewing &amp; Distilling</pub><doi>10.1002/jib.517</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-2366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7711</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-9750
ispartof Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 2018-10, Vol.124 (4), p.434-442
issn 0046-9750
2050-0416
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2130200482
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Aroma
Beer
Brewing
Distillation
dry‐hopping rate
Flavor
hop aroma
hop chemistry
hop extraction efficiency
hop sensory
Mathematical analysis
Qualitative analysis
Sensory evaluation
Sensory properties
Volatiles
title Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A27%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20static%20dry%E2%80%90hopping%20rate%20on%20the%20sensory%20and%20analytical%20profiles%20of%20beer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Brewing&rft.au=Lafontaine,%20Scott%20R.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=434-442&rft.issn=0046-9750&rft.eissn=2050-0416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jib.517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2130200482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130200482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true