Loading…
Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer
Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Institute of Brewing 2018-10, Vol.124 (4), p.434-442 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03 |
container_end_page | 442 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 434 |
container_title | Journal of the Institute of Brewing |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Lafontaine, Scott R. Shellhammer, Thomas H. |
description | Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jib.517 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130200482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2130200482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI7iKwRcuJCON0mTZpY6-FMZEETXIU0Tp0OnqUkH6c5H8Bl9EjOMWxeXu_k4nPMhdE5gRgDo9bqpZpwUB2hCgUMGORGHaAKQi2xecDhGJzGuAXhOCZ-gl3LTazNg73Ac9NAYXIfx5-t75fu-6d5x0IPFvsPDyuJou-jDiHVXp9PtmHDd4j5417Q27jIqa8MpOnK6jfbs70_R2_3d6-IxWz4_lIubZWYYpUXGWCFyDlCLilCumRSVEAwMkxVQbhypK-4ktZxJKYikdE6IkZyJ2hFuHbAputjnpgIfWxsHtfbbkHpFRQkDmiZLmqjLPWWCjzFYp_rQbHQYFQG1E6aSMJWEJfJqT36mNeN_mHoqb3f0L_Zzaog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130200482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Lafontaine, Scott R. ; Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Scott R. ; Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><description>Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-9750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0416</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jib.517</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Institute of Brewing & Distilling</publisher><subject>Aroma ; Beer ; Brewing ; Distillation ; dry‐hopping rate ; Flavor ; hop aroma ; hop chemistry ; hop extraction efficiency ; hop sensory ; Mathematical analysis ; Qualitative analysis ; Sensory evaluation ; Sensory properties ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 2018-10, Vol.124 (4), p.434-442</ispartof><rights>2018 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4055-2366 ; 0000-0003-4098-7711</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjib.517$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjib.517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Scott R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</title><title>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</title><description>Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling</description><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Beer</subject><subject>Brewing</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>dry‐hopping rate</subject><subject>Flavor</subject><subject>hop aroma</subject><subject>hop chemistry</subject><subject>hop extraction efficiency</subject><subject>hop sensory</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory properties</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>0046-9750</issn><issn>2050-0416</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOI7iKwRcuJCON0mTZpY6-FMZEETXIU0Tp0OnqUkH6c5H8Bl9EjOMWxeXu_k4nPMhdE5gRgDo9bqpZpwUB2hCgUMGORGHaAKQi2xecDhGJzGuAXhOCZ-gl3LTazNg73Ac9NAYXIfx5-t75fu-6d5x0IPFvsPDyuJou-jDiHVXp9PtmHDd4j5417Q27jIqa8MpOnK6jfbs70_R2_3d6-IxWz4_lIubZWYYpUXGWCFyDlCLilCumRSVEAwMkxVQbhypK-4ktZxJKYikdE6IkZyJ2hFuHbAputjnpgIfWxsHtfbbkHpFRQkDmiZLmqjLPWWCjzFYp_rQbHQYFQG1E6aSMJWEJfJqT36mNeN_mHoqb3f0L_Zzaog</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Lafontaine, Scott R.</creator><creator>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creator><general>Institute of Brewing & Distilling</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-2366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7711</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</title><author>Lafontaine, Scott R. ; Shellhammer, Thomas H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Beer</topic><topic>Brewing</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>dry‐hopping rate</topic><topic>Flavor</topic><topic>hop aroma</topic><topic>hop chemistry</topic><topic>hop extraction efficiency</topic><topic>hop sensory</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory properties</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lafontaine, Scott R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lafontaine, Scott R.</au><au>Shellhammer, Thomas H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Institute of Brewing</jtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>434</spage><epage>442</epage><pages>434-442</pages><issn>0046-9750</issn><eissn>2050-0416</eissn><abstract>Dry‐hopping is a technique that has been used by brewers to increase the hop aroma and flavour of beer for centuries. Throughout the twenty first century, dry‐hopping has become an increasingly popular method among craft brewers to impart intense hoppy aroma and flavour to beer. Many US craft brewers use extremely high dry‐hop dosing rates of up to 2200 g/hL and this is both unsustainable and potentially wasteful. This study examines the impact of dry‐hopping rate on the sensorial and analytical characteristics of dry‐hopped beers. An unhopped pale beer was statically dry‐hopped with whole cone Cascade from the 2015 harvest over a broad range of dry‐hopping rates (200–1600 g/hL) in replicated, pilot scale (80 L) aliquots. Trained panellists using descriptive analysis scaled the overall and qualitative hop aroma intensity of these beers, as well as the unhopped base beer. Instrumental analysis was used to measure the levels of hop volatile and non‐volatile extraction between the treatments. The relationship between dry‐hopping rate and the sensorial and analytical characteristics of the finished beer was not linear and, based on the extraction efficiencies of select hop volatiles, had an ideal range between 400 and 800 g/hL. © 2018 The Institute of Brewing & Distilling</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Institute of Brewing & Distilling</pub><doi>10.1002/jib.517</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-2366</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4098-7711</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-9750 |
ispartof | Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 2018-10, Vol.124 (4), p.434-442 |
issn | 0046-9750 2050-0416 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2130200482 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals |
subjects | Aroma Beer Brewing Distillation dry‐hopping rate Flavor hop aroma hop chemistry hop extraction efficiency hop sensory Mathematical analysis Qualitative analysis Sensory evaluation Sensory properties Volatiles |
title | Impact of static dry‐hopping rate on the sensory and analytical profiles of beer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A27%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20static%20dry%E2%80%90hopping%20rate%20on%20the%20sensory%20and%20analytical%20profiles%20of%20beer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Institute%20of%20Brewing&rft.au=Lafontaine,%20Scott%20R.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=434&rft.epage=442&rft.pages=434-442&rft.issn=0046-9750&rft.eissn=2050-0416&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jib.517&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2130200482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3227-33764500d6b125a386b6630c38b025cf1db5f82e538861822911c8536df15ef03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130200482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |