Loading…

Impact of Electricity Pricing Policies on Renewable Energy Investments and Carbon Emissions

We investigate the impact of pricing policies (i.e., flat pricing versus peak pricing) on the investment levels of a utility firm in two competing energy sources (renewable and conventional), with a focus on the renewable investment level. We consider generation patterns and intermittency of solar a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Management science 2018-01, Vol.64 (1), p.131-148
Main Authors: Kök, A. Gürhan, Shang, Kevin, Yücel, Şafak
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3
container_end_page 148
container_issue 1
container_start_page 131
container_title Management science
container_volume 64
creator Kök, A. Gürhan
Shang, Kevin
Yücel, Şafak
description We investigate the impact of pricing policies (i.e., flat pricing versus peak pricing) on the investment levels of a utility firm in two competing energy sources (renewable and conventional), with a focus on the renewable investment level. We consider generation patterns and intermittency of solar and wind energy in relation to the electricity demand throughout a day. Industry experts generally promote peak pricing policy as it smoothens the demand and reduces inefficiencies in the supply system. We find that the same pricing policy may lead to distinct outcomes for different renewable energy sources due to their generation patterns. Specifically, flat pricing leads to a higher investment level for solar energy, and it can lead to still more investments in wind energy if a considerable amount of wind energy is generated throughout the day. We validate these results by using electricity generation and demand data of the state of Texas. We also show that flat pricing can lead to substantially lower carbon emissions and a higher consumer surplus. Finally, we explore the effect of direct (e.g., tax credit) and indirect (e.g., carbon tax) subsidies on investment levels and carbon emissions. We show that both types of subsidies generally lead to a lower emission level but that indirect subsidies may result in lower renewable energy investments. Our study suggests that reducing carbon emissions through increasing renewable energy investments requires careful attention to the pricing policy and the market characteristics of each region. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management .
doi_str_mv 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2576
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130770878</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A528711240</galeid><jstor_id>48747947</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A528711240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFktGL1DAQxosouJ6--iYEBJ_sOmmbpn08lvVcOPAQffIhpNlpzdImayZ7uv_9pax4LixIHiaE35f5Zviy7DWHJS8a-WFyZJYF8HpZCFk_yRZcFHUuBPCn2QKgEDlvoX2evSDaAYBsZL3Ivm-mvTaR-Z6tRzQxWGPjkd3N1Q3szo_pgsS8Y1_Q4S_djcjWDsNwZBt3jxQndJGYdlu20qFL3HqyRNY7epk96_VI-OpPvcq-fVx_XX3Kbz_fbFbXt7mpQcS8QFl2TdWWZZoCayF7SJ47UZd8C1Upei6gBNOIBvtam20NpWwlIlaybYXU5VX29vTvPvifh2RJ7fwhuNRSFbwEKaGRzSM16BGVdb2PQZvk1ahrkTpzXlSQqPwCNaTRgx69w96m5zN-eYFPZ4uTNRcF784EiYn4Ow76QKTOwff_gN2BrMO0V0d2-BHpxF8yYoInCtirfbCTDkfFQc35UHM-1JwPNecjCd6cBDuKPvylq0amvVbycRPzUGGi__33ANAlwmo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130770878</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Electricity Pricing Policies on Renewable Energy Investments and Carbon Emissions</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>INFORMS journals</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Kök, A. Gürhan ; Shang, Kevin ; Yücel, Şafak</creator><creatorcontrib>Kök, A. Gürhan ; Shang, Kevin ; Yücel, Şafak</creatorcontrib><description>We investigate the impact of pricing policies (i.e., flat pricing versus peak pricing) on the investment levels of a utility firm in two competing energy sources (renewable and conventional), with a focus on the renewable investment level. We consider generation patterns and intermittency of solar and wind energy in relation to the electricity demand throughout a day. Industry experts generally promote peak pricing policy as it smoothens the demand and reduces inefficiencies in the supply system. We find that the same pricing policy may lead to distinct outcomes for different renewable energy sources due to their generation patterns. Specifically, flat pricing leads to a higher investment level for solar energy, and it can lead to still more investments in wind energy if a considerable amount of wind energy is generated throughout the day. We validate these results by using electricity generation and demand data of the state of Texas. We also show that flat pricing can lead to substantially lower carbon emissions and a higher consumer surplus. Finally, we explore the effect of direct (e.g., tax credit) and indirect (e.g., carbon tax) subsidies on investment levels and carbon emissions. We show that both types of subsidies generally lead to a lower emission level but that indirect subsidies may result in lower renewable energy investments. Our study suggests that reducing carbon emissions through increasing renewable energy investments requires careful attention to the pricing policy and the market characteristics of each region. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Alternative energy ; Alternative energy sources ; Carbon ; carbon emissions ; Economic aspects ; Electric power ; Electricity ; electricity pricing policies ; Emissions (Pollution) ; Environmental aspects ; Finance ; Investment ; Investments ; Prices and rates ; Pricing policies ; renewable energy investment</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2018-01, Vol.64 (1), p.131-148</ispartof><rights>2016 INFORMS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48747947$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2576$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3692,27924,27925,33223,58238,58471,62616</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kök, A. Gürhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yücel, Şafak</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Electricity Pricing Policies on Renewable Energy Investments and Carbon Emissions</title><title>Management science</title><description>We investigate the impact of pricing policies (i.e., flat pricing versus peak pricing) on the investment levels of a utility firm in two competing energy sources (renewable and conventional), with a focus on the renewable investment level. We consider generation patterns and intermittency of solar and wind energy in relation to the electricity demand throughout a day. Industry experts generally promote peak pricing policy as it smoothens the demand and reduces inefficiencies in the supply system. We find that the same pricing policy may lead to distinct outcomes for different renewable energy sources due to their generation patterns. Specifically, flat pricing leads to a higher investment level for solar energy, and it can lead to still more investments in wind energy if a considerable amount of wind energy is generated throughout the day. We validate these results by using electricity generation and demand data of the state of Texas. We also show that flat pricing can lead to substantially lower carbon emissions and a higher consumer surplus. Finally, we explore the effect of direct (e.g., tax credit) and indirect (e.g., carbon tax) subsidies on investment levels and carbon emissions. We show that both types of subsidies generally lead to a lower emission level but that indirect subsidies may result in lower renewable energy investments. Our study suggests that reducing carbon emissions through increasing renewable energy investments requires careful attention to the pricing policy and the market characteristics of each region. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management .</description><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon emissions</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Electric power</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>electricity pricing policies</subject><subject>Emissions (Pollution)</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Investment</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Prices and rates</subject><subject>Pricing policies</subject><subject>renewable energy investment</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFktGL1DAQxosouJ6--iYEBJ_sOmmbpn08lvVcOPAQffIhpNlpzdImayZ7uv_9pax4LixIHiaE35f5Zviy7DWHJS8a-WFyZJYF8HpZCFk_yRZcFHUuBPCn2QKgEDlvoX2evSDaAYBsZL3Ivm-mvTaR-Z6tRzQxWGPjkd3N1Q3szo_pgsS8Y1_Q4S_djcjWDsNwZBt3jxQndJGYdlu20qFL3HqyRNY7epk96_VI-OpPvcq-fVx_XX3Kbz_fbFbXt7mpQcS8QFl2TdWWZZoCayF7SJ47UZd8C1Upei6gBNOIBvtam20NpWwlIlaybYXU5VX29vTvPvifh2RJ7fwhuNRSFbwEKaGRzSM16BGVdb2PQZvk1ahrkTpzXlSQqPwCNaTRgx69w96m5zN-eYFPZ4uTNRcF784EiYn4Ow76QKTOwff_gN2BrMO0V0d2-BHpxF8yYoInCtirfbCTDkfFQc35UHM-1JwPNecjCd6cBDuKPvylq0amvVbycRPzUGGi__33ANAlwmo</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Kök, A. Gürhan</creator><creator>Shang, Kevin</creator><creator>Yücel, Şafak</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Impact of Electricity Pricing Policies on Renewable Energy Investments and Carbon Emissions</title><author>Kök, A. Gürhan ; Shang, Kevin ; Yücel, Şafak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon emissions</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Electric power</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>electricity pricing policies</topic><topic>Emissions (Pollution)</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Investment</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Prices and rates</topic><topic>Pricing policies</topic><topic>renewable energy investment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kök, A. Gürhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yücel, Şafak</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kök, A. Gürhan</au><au>Shang, Kevin</au><au>Yücel, Şafak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Electricity Pricing Policies on Renewable Energy Investments and Carbon Emissions</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>131-148</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>We investigate the impact of pricing policies (i.e., flat pricing versus peak pricing) on the investment levels of a utility firm in two competing energy sources (renewable and conventional), with a focus on the renewable investment level. We consider generation patterns and intermittency of solar and wind energy in relation to the electricity demand throughout a day. Industry experts generally promote peak pricing policy as it smoothens the demand and reduces inefficiencies in the supply system. We find that the same pricing policy may lead to distinct outcomes for different renewable energy sources due to their generation patterns. Specifically, flat pricing leads to a higher investment level for solar energy, and it can lead to still more investments in wind energy if a considerable amount of wind energy is generated throughout the day. We validate these results by using electricity generation and demand data of the state of Texas. We also show that flat pricing can lead to substantially lower carbon emissions and a higher consumer surplus. Finally, we explore the effect of direct (e.g., tax credit) and indirect (e.g., carbon tax) subsidies on investment levels and carbon emissions. We show that both types of subsidies generally lead to a lower emission level but that indirect subsidies may result in lower renewable energy investments. Our study suggests that reducing carbon emissions through increasing renewable energy investments requires careful attention to the pricing policy and the market characteristics of each region. This paper was accepted by Serguei Netessine, operations management .</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2016.2576</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1909
ispartof Management science, 2018-01, Vol.64 (1), p.131-148
issn 0025-1909
1526-5501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2130770878
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); INFORMS journals; Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Alternative energy
Alternative energy sources
Carbon
carbon emissions
Economic aspects
Electric power
Electricity
electricity pricing policies
Emissions (Pollution)
Environmental aspects
Finance
Investment
Investments
Prices and rates
Pricing policies
renewable energy investment
title Impact of Electricity Pricing Policies on Renewable Energy Investments and Carbon Emissions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T19%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Electricity%20Pricing%20Policies%20on%20Renewable%20Energy%20Investments%20and%20Carbon%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=K%C3%B6k,%20A.%20G%C3%BCrhan&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=131-148&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2576&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA528711240%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-2e73b84933287e657f0501b5631d0435f15030c858ef6acd603797eee479957a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130770878&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A528711240&rft_jstor_id=48747947&rfr_iscdi=true