Loading…
Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries
The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Swit...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of community & applied social psychology 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.430-445 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3 |
container_end_page | 445 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 430 |
container_title | Journal of community & applied social psychology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Staerklé, Christian Green, Eva G.T. |
description | The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/casp.2369 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130792253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2130792253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgysW0ycnc4q6UeoGC4mUpIU0zNWWaxGSG0p2P4DP6JM60bl0czoHznfP__AhdUjKihMBYyehHwHJ-hAaUcJ5Q4OVxP2eQcCjTU3QW45oQkvMsH6D3Z7P6aH6-vrfGrrB3vq1N3GAZscTRKSNrHLQPOmrbyMY4e4MnWLmNl8FEZ7FUwcWIK9cGPGuD81rabt_aJhgdz9FJJeuoL_76EL3dzl6n98n88e5hOpknijHgSbksVEUlKK70ImW5olCArMgi16BK6EqnJVd5wWhZFDpbLgjJaCoppTkHvmRDdHX464P7bHVsxLozZDtJAZSRggNkrKOuD9Tec9CV8MFsZNgJSkSfnujTE316HTs-sFtT693_oJhOXp72F7_sqHL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130792253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Staerklé, Christian ; Green, Eva G.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Staerklé, Christian ; Green, Eva G.T.</creatorcontrib><description>The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/casp.2369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Citizens ; Collective representation ; Comparative studies ; Differentiation ; Efficacy ; European politics ; Immigrants ; Insecurity ; left‐ and right‐wing ; Political attitudes ; Populism ; prejudice ; Social sciences ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.430-445</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1516-0157 ; 0000-0001-5974-4168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staerklé, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Eva G.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</title><title>Journal of community & applied social psychology</title><description>The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.</description><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Collective representation</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>European politics</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>left‐ and right‐wing</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>prejudice</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1052-9284</issn><issn>1099-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgysW0ycnc4q6UeoGC4mUpIU0zNWWaxGSG0p2P4DP6JM60bl0czoHznfP__AhdUjKihMBYyehHwHJ-hAaUcJ5Q4OVxP2eQcCjTU3QW45oQkvMsH6D3Z7P6aH6-vrfGrrB3vq1N3GAZscTRKSNrHLQPOmrbyMY4e4MnWLmNl8FEZ7FUwcWIK9cGPGuD81rabt_aJhgdz9FJJeuoL_76EL3dzl6n98n88e5hOpknijHgSbksVEUlKK70ImW5olCArMgi16BK6EqnJVd5wWhZFDpbLgjJaCoppTkHvmRDdHX464P7bHVsxLozZDtJAZSRggNkrKOuD9Tec9CV8MFsZNgJSkSfnujTE316HTs-sFtT693_oJhOXp72F7_sqHL_</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Staerklé, Christian</creator><creator>Green, Eva G.T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-0157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-4168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</title><author>Staerklé, Christian ; Green, Eva G.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Collective representation</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>European politics</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>left‐ and right‐wing</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>prejudice</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staerklé, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Eva G.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of community & applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staerklé, Christian</au><au>Green, Eva G.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community & applied social psychology</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>430-445</pages><issn>1052-9284</issn><eissn>1099-1298</eissn><abstract>The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/casp.2369</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-0157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-4168</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-9284 |
ispartof | Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.430-445 |
issn | 1052-9284 1099-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2130792253 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Citizens Collective representation Comparative studies Differentiation Efficacy European politics Immigrants Insecurity left‐ and right‐wing Political attitudes Populism prejudice Social sciences Trust |
title | Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right%E2%80%90wing%20populism%20as%20a%20social%20representation:%20A%20comparison%20across%20four%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20&%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Staerkl%C3%A9,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=430-445&rft.issn=1052-9284&rft.eissn=1099-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/casp.2369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2130792253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130792253&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |