Loading…

Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries

The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Swit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of community & applied social psychology 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.430-445
Main Authors: Staerklé, Christian, Green, Eva G.T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3
container_end_page 445
container_issue 6
container_start_page 430
container_title Journal of community & applied social psychology
container_volume 28
creator Staerklé, Christian
Green, Eva G.T.
description The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/casp.2369
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130792253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2130792253</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgysW0ycnc4q6UeoGC4mUpIU0zNWWaxGSG0p2P4DP6JM60bl0czoHznfP__AhdUjKihMBYyehHwHJ-hAaUcJ5Q4OVxP2eQcCjTU3QW45oQkvMsH6D3Z7P6aH6-vrfGrrB3vq1N3GAZscTRKSNrHLQPOmrbyMY4e4MnWLmNl8FEZ7FUwcWIK9cGPGuD81rabt_aJhgdz9FJJeuoL_76EL3dzl6n98n88e5hOpknijHgSbksVEUlKK70ImW5olCArMgi16BK6EqnJVd5wWhZFDpbLgjJaCoppTkHvmRDdHX464P7bHVsxLozZDtJAZSRggNkrKOuD9Tec9CV8MFsZNgJSkSfnujTE316HTs-sFtT693_oJhOXp72F7_sqHL_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130792253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Staerklé, Christian ; Green, Eva G.T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Staerklé, Christian ; Green, Eva G.T.</creatorcontrib><description>The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-9284</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/casp.2369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Citizens ; Collective representation ; Comparative studies ; Differentiation ; Efficacy ; European politics ; Immigrants ; Insecurity ; left‐ and right‐wing ; Political attitudes ; Populism ; prejudice ; Social sciences ; Trust</subject><ispartof>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology, 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.430-445</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1516-0157 ; 0000-0001-5974-4168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,33223,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Staerklé, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Eva G.T.</creatorcontrib><title>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</title><title>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology</title><description>The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.</description><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Collective representation</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>European politics</subject><subject>Immigrants</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>left‐ and right‐wing</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>prejudice</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Trust</subject><issn>1052-9284</issn><issn>1099-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgysW0ycnc4q6UeoGC4mUpIU0zNWWaxGSG0p2P4DP6JM60bl0czoHznfP__AhdUjKihMBYyehHwHJ-hAaUcJ5Q4OVxP2eQcCjTU3QW45oQkvMsH6D3Z7P6aH6-vrfGrrB3vq1N3GAZscTRKSNrHLQPOmrbyMY4e4MnWLmNl8FEZ7FUwcWIK9cGPGuD81rabt_aJhgdz9FJJeuoL_76EL3dzl6n98n88e5hOpknijHgSbksVEUlKK70ImW5olCArMgi16BK6EqnJVd5wWhZFDpbLgjJaCoppTkHvmRDdHX464P7bHVsxLozZDtJAZSRggNkrKOuD9Tec9CV8MFsZNgJSkSfnujTE316HTs-sFtT693_oJhOXp72F7_sqHL_</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Staerklé, Christian</creator><creator>Green, Eva G.T.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-0157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-4168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</title><author>Staerklé, Christian ; Green, Eva G.T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Collective representation</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>European politics</topic><topic>Immigrants</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>left‐ and right‐wing</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>prejudice</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Trust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Staerklé, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Eva G.T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Staerklé, Christian</au><au>Green, Eva G.T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of community &amp; applied social psychology</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>430</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>430-445</pages><issn>1052-9284</issn><eissn>1099-1298</eissn><abstract>The rise of right‐wing populist parties has been widely discussed across the social sciences during the last decade. Taking a social representational approach, we analyse organising principles and anchoring of right‐wing populist thinking across four European countries (France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom). Using European Social Survey data (Round 7), we compare political attitudes and self‐appraisals of citizens identifying with right‐wing populist, conservative right‐wing, and traditional left‐wing parties. The findings converge across the four countries to show that right‐wing populist identifiers diverge from both left‐ and right‐wing identifiers on vertical (between the “people” and the “elite”) and horizontal (between nationals and immigrants) dimensions of differentiation. Depending on the context, right‐wing populist identification was fuelled by material and physical insecurity, low political efficacy, and distrust of fellow citizens. We conclude that right‐wing populism requires multiple strategies of differentiation within and between groups to justify and sustain itself.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/casp.2369</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-0157</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-4168</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1052-9284
ispartof Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2018-11, Vol.28 (6), p.430-445
issn 1052-9284
1099-1298
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2130792253
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Citizens
Collective representation
Comparative studies
Differentiation
Efficacy
European politics
Immigrants
Insecurity
left‐ and right‐wing
Political attitudes
Populism
prejudice
Social sciences
Trust
title Right‐wing populism as a social representation: A comparison across four European countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Right%E2%80%90wing%20populism%20as%20a%20social%20representation:%20A%20comparison%20across%20four%20European%20countries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20community%20&%20applied%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Staerkl%C3%A9,%20Christian&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=430&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=430-445&rft.issn=1052-9284&rft.eissn=1099-1298&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/casp.2369&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2130792253%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3329-8d7cf1a2c9ceb436c1272af0b6e2c822c8e489c6731877e5db00514a1116929d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130792253&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true