Loading…

Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Summary We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical obesity 2018-12, Vol.8 (6), p.424-433
Main Authors: Magouliotis, D. E., Tasiopoulou, V. S., Svokos, K. A., Svokos, A. A., Sioka, E., Tzovaras, G., Zacharoulis, D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623
container_end_page 433
container_issue 6
container_start_page 424
container_title Clinical obesity
container_volume 8
creator Magouliotis, D. E.
Tasiopoulou, V. S.
Svokos, K. A.
Svokos, A. A.
Sioka, E.
Tzovaras, G.
Zacharoulis, D.
description Summary We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well‐designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cob.12274
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2130986726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2130986726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EElXpwBtYYmJIG9uJ47DRij-pUiUEA5NlJzZK1cTBN23JxiPwjDwJLkFsnMW-R5-Prg9C5ySekqBZ4fSUUJolR2hEslREIrjHf_eYnaIJwDoO4pTnaTJC7Vw1pSnxDqa4cc3Xx6cejEe3fQ-TOVgv-FVB56sC675VANg6j2vndVVipw1UXX-FFYYeOlOrLnDe7CqzxyEK16ZTIUM1atNDBWfoxKoNmMnvOUbPtzdPi_toubp7WFwvo4KlLInSlCc64aUmIqEiE7qkpbHCWGJEQkrFCxt-kdNA2DgATLBcpEaRjLPccsrG6GLIbb172xro5NptfVgCJCUszgXPKA_U5UAV3gF4Y2Xrq1r5XpJYHjqVoVP502lgZwO7rzam_x-Ui9V8ePENrRp7mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2130986726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Magouliotis, D. E. ; Tasiopoulou, V. S. ; Svokos, K. A. ; Svokos, A. A. ; Sioka, E. ; Tzovaras, G. ; Zacharoulis, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Magouliotis, D. E. ; Tasiopoulou, V. S. ; Svokos, K. A. ; Svokos, A. A. ; Sioka, E. ; Tzovaras, G. ; Zacharoulis, D.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well‐designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-8103</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-8111</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cob.12274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Apnea ; banded gastric bypass ; bariatric surgery ; Body weight loss ; Clinical outcomes ; Complications ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Gastric bypass ; Gastroesophageal reflux ; Gastrointestinal surgery ; Meta-analysis ; Obesity ; Randomization ; Remission ; Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass ; Sleep disorders ; Systematic review ; Weight control ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Clinical obesity, 2018-12, Vol.8 (6), p.424-433</ispartof><rights>2018 World Obesity Federation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5417-6392</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magouliotis, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasiopoulou, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svokos, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svokos, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sioka, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzovaras, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacharoulis, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical obesity</title><description>Summary We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well‐designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Apnea</subject><subject>banded gastric bypass</subject><subject>bariatric surgery</subject><subject>Body weight loss</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Gastric bypass</subject><subject>Gastroesophageal reflux</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal surgery</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass</subject><subject>Sleep disorders</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>1758-8103</issn><issn>1758-8111</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EElXpwBtYYmJIG9uJ47DRij-pUiUEA5NlJzZK1cTBN23JxiPwjDwJLkFsnMW-R5-Prg9C5ySekqBZ4fSUUJolR2hEslREIrjHf_eYnaIJwDoO4pTnaTJC7Vw1pSnxDqa4cc3Xx6cejEe3fQ-TOVgv-FVB56sC675VANg6j2vndVVipw1UXX-FFYYeOlOrLnDe7CqzxyEK16ZTIUM1atNDBWfoxKoNmMnvOUbPtzdPi_toubp7WFwvo4KlLInSlCc64aUmIqEiE7qkpbHCWGJEQkrFCxt-kdNA2DgATLBcpEaRjLPccsrG6GLIbb172xro5NptfVgCJCUszgXPKA_U5UAV3gF4Y2Xrq1r5XpJYHjqVoVP502lgZwO7rzam_x-Ui9V8ePENrRp7mg</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Magouliotis, D. E.</creator><creator>Tasiopoulou, V. S.</creator><creator>Svokos, K. A.</creator><creator>Svokos, A. A.</creator><creator>Sioka, E.</creator><creator>Tzovaras, G.</creator><creator>Zacharoulis, D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5417-6392</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Magouliotis, D. E. ; Tasiopoulou, V. S. ; Svokos, K. A. ; Svokos, A. A. ; Sioka, E. ; Tzovaras, G. ; Zacharoulis, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Apnea</topic><topic>banded gastric bypass</topic><topic>bariatric surgery</topic><topic>Body weight loss</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Gastric bypass</topic><topic>Gastroesophageal reflux</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal surgery</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass</topic><topic>Sleep disorders</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magouliotis, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasiopoulou, V. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svokos, K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Svokos, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sioka, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tzovaras, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zacharoulis, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Clinical obesity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magouliotis, D. E.</au><au>Tasiopoulou, V. S.</au><au>Svokos, K. A.</au><au>Svokos, A. A.</au><au>Sioka, E.</au><au>Tzovaras, G.</au><au>Zacharoulis, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical obesity</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>424</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>424-433</pages><issn>1758-8103</issn><eissn>1758-8111</eissn><abstract>Summary We aim to review the available literature on patients with morbid obesity treated with banded (BRYGB) or non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (NBRYGB), in order to compare the clinical outcomes and intraoperative parameters of the two methods. A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane library and Scopus databases, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria incorporating 3899 patients. This study reveals similar rates of complications, mortality, remission of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, gastroesophageal reflux and obstructive sleep apnoea, along with similar % excess weight loss (%EWL) at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. In contrast, according to an analysis of two eligible studies the BRYGB procedure was associated with increased %EWL at 5 years postoperatively. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of statistical arms and randomized controlled studies. However, the present article represents the best available evidence in the field. Well‐designed, randomized controlled studies, comparing BRYGB to NBRYGB, are necessary to further assess their clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/cob.12274</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5417-6392</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1758-8103
ispartof Clinical obesity, 2018-12, Vol.8 (6), p.424-433
issn 1758-8103
1758-8111
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2130986726
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects Apnea
banded gastric bypass
bariatric surgery
Body weight loss
Clinical outcomes
Complications
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Gastric bypass
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gastrointestinal surgery
Meta-analysis
Obesity
Randomization
Remission
Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass
Sleep disorders
Systematic review
Weight control
Weight loss
title Banded vs. non‐banded Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Banded%20vs.%20non%E2%80%90banded%20Roux%E2%80%90en%E2%80%90Y%20gastric%20bypass%20for%20morbid%20obesity:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20obesity&rft.au=Magouliotis,%20D.%20E.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=424&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=424-433&rft.issn=1758-8103&rft.eissn=1758-8111&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cob.12274&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2130986726%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-5564b46db1842878bd2def8ef1e841da6cf000926dbf0287383985ea17639f623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2130986726&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true