Loading…
Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly
This paper investigates mechanisms by which a powerful original equipment manufacturers procures multiple inputs for assembly from suppliers with privately informed costs, either simultaneously or sequentially. The optimal mechanisms always lead to matching purchase quantities of the inputs. Thus, q...
Saved in:
Published in: | Manufacturing & service operations management 2018-09, Vol.20 (4), p.655-666 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93 |
container_end_page | 666 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 655 |
container_title | Manufacturing & service operations management |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Hu, Bin Qi, Anyan |
description | This paper investigates mechanisms by which a powerful original equipment manufacturers procures multiple inputs for assembly from suppliers with privately informed costs, either simultaneously or sequentially. The optimal mechanisms always lead to matching purchase quantities of the inputs. Thus, quantity–payment contracts that implement the optimal mechanisms are contingent across suppliers (i.e., each supplier’s contract terms contain other suppliers’ private costs as variables), making the implementation impractical. To address this issue, we propose alternative implementations of the optimal mechanisms by menus of two-part tariff contracts that are noncontingent. In addition, optimal simultaneous and sequential procurement mechanisms for assembly are shown to be revenue-equivalent for all parties despite their different asymmetric information structures. Our findings suggest that procurement managers need not strategize contracting sequences for assembly, but should rather focus on achieving the best pricing with each supplier and coordinating purchase quantities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/msom.2017.0672 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2131589976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A553628245</galeid><sourcerecordid>A553628245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AiCj6vnhcEL9o176THRXyBogc9hzQ7WStNu2ZacL-9rQq6sCCBJITfJBP-WXZMyZQyoy8itnHKCNVTojTbyvaoZCqXojDbX3ueC0XFbraP-EYIoYawvezscdlV0dWTp9T6PkGEpps8gH91TYURJ6FNkxkixLJeHWY7wdUIRz_rQfZyffV8eZvfP97cXc7ucy8F73LluZp7obQLhqlCBwYl0caXjvC5cQokCK2D4FpoI6WTNIDirlRUlrqcF_wgO_m-d5na9x6ws29tn5rhScsop9IUhVa_auFqsFUT2i45Hyv0diYlV8wwIQeVb1ALaCC5um0gVMPxmp9u8MOYQ6z8xoLTtYLBdPDRLVyPaNfh-R9Y9lg1gMOE1eK1w2-_qRGfWsQEwS7TEFRaWUrsmLcd87Zj3nbM-_enY9Mp4n_-E99pqOY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131589976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Informs</source><creator>Hu, Bin ; Qi, Anyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bin ; Qi, Anyan</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates mechanisms by which a powerful original equipment manufacturers procures multiple inputs for assembly from suppliers with privately informed costs, either simultaneously or sequentially. The optimal mechanisms always lead to matching purchase quantities of the inputs. Thus, quantity–payment contracts that implement the optimal mechanisms are contingent across suppliers (i.e., each supplier’s contract terms contain other suppliers’ private costs as variables), making the implementation impractical. To address this issue, we propose alternative implementations of the optimal mechanisms by menus of two-part tariff contracts that are noncontingent. In addition, optimal simultaneous and sequential procurement mechanisms for assembly are shown to be revenue-equivalent for all parties despite their different asymmetric information structures. Our findings suggest that procurement managers need not strategize contracting sequences for assembly, but should rather focus on achieving the best pricing with each supplier and coordinating purchase quantities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5498</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/msom.2017.0672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Assembly-line methods ; Contract manufacturing ; contracting timing ; Contracts ; Costs ; informed principal ; mechanism design ; Operations management ; Payments ; Purchasing ; Revenue ; screening ; Tariffs ; two-part tariff</subject><ispartof>Manufacturing & service operations management, 2018-09, Vol.20 (4), p.655-666</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</rights><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Fall 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1841-9024 ; 0000-0003-2933-8294</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/msom.2017.0672$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3692,27924,27925,62616</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Anyan</creatorcontrib><title>Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly</title><title>Manufacturing & service operations management</title><description>This paper investigates mechanisms by which a powerful original equipment manufacturers procures multiple inputs for assembly from suppliers with privately informed costs, either simultaneously or sequentially. The optimal mechanisms always lead to matching purchase quantities of the inputs. Thus, quantity–payment contracts that implement the optimal mechanisms are contingent across suppliers (i.e., each supplier’s contract terms contain other suppliers’ private costs as variables), making the implementation impractical. To address this issue, we propose alternative implementations of the optimal mechanisms by menus of two-part tariff contracts that are noncontingent. In addition, optimal simultaneous and sequential procurement mechanisms for assembly are shown to be revenue-equivalent for all parties despite their different asymmetric information structures. Our findings suggest that procurement managers need not strategize contracting sequences for assembly, but should rather focus on achieving the best pricing with each supplier and coordinating purchase quantities.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assembly-line methods</subject><subject>Contract manufacturing</subject><subject>contracting timing</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>informed principal</subject><subject>mechanism design</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>screening</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>two-part tariff</subject><issn>1523-4614</issn><issn>1526-5498</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AiCj6vnhcEL9o176THRXyBogc9hzQ7WStNu2ZacL-9rQq6sCCBJITfJBP-WXZMyZQyoy8itnHKCNVTojTbyvaoZCqXojDbX3ueC0XFbraP-EYIoYawvezscdlV0dWTp9T6PkGEpps8gH91TYURJ6FNkxkixLJeHWY7wdUIRz_rQfZyffV8eZvfP97cXc7ucy8F73LluZp7obQLhqlCBwYl0caXjvC5cQokCK2D4FpoI6WTNIDirlRUlrqcF_wgO_m-d5na9x6ws29tn5rhScsop9IUhVa_auFqsFUT2i45Hyv0diYlV8wwIQeVb1ALaCC5um0gVMPxmp9u8MOYQ6z8xoLTtYLBdPDRLVyPaNfh-R9Y9lg1gMOE1eK1w2-_qRGfWsQEwS7TEFRaWUrsmLcd87Zj3nbM-_enY9Mp4n_-E99pqOY</recordid><startdate>20180922</startdate><enddate>20180922</enddate><creator>Hu, Bin</creator><creator>Qi, Anyan</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-9024</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-8294</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180922</creationdate><title>Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly</title><author>Hu, Bin ; Qi, Anyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assembly-line methods</topic><topic>Contract manufacturing</topic><topic>contracting timing</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>informed principal</topic><topic>mechanism design</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>screening</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>two-part tariff</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Anyan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Manufacturing & service operations management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Bin</au><au>Qi, Anyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly</atitle><jtitle>Manufacturing & service operations management</jtitle><date>2018-09-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>655-666</pages><issn>1523-4614</issn><eissn>1526-5498</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates mechanisms by which a powerful original equipment manufacturers procures multiple inputs for assembly from suppliers with privately informed costs, either simultaneously or sequentially. The optimal mechanisms always lead to matching purchase quantities of the inputs. Thus, quantity–payment contracts that implement the optimal mechanisms are contingent across suppliers (i.e., each supplier’s contract terms contain other suppliers’ private costs as variables), making the implementation impractical. To address this issue, we propose alternative implementations of the optimal mechanisms by menus of two-part tariff contracts that are noncontingent. In addition, optimal simultaneous and sequential procurement mechanisms for assembly are shown to be revenue-equivalent for all parties despite their different asymmetric information structures. Our findings suggest that procurement managers need not strategize contracting sequences for assembly, but should rather focus on achieving the best pricing with each supplier and coordinating purchase quantities.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/msom.2017.0672</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-9024</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2933-8294</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-4614 |
ispartof | Manufacturing & service operations management, 2018-09, Vol.20 (4), p.655-666 |
issn | 1523-4614 1526-5498 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2131589976 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Informs |
subjects | Analysis Assembly-line methods Contract manufacturing contracting timing Contracts Costs informed principal mechanism design Operations management Payments Purchasing Revenue screening Tariffs two-part tariff |
title | Optimal Procurement Mechanisms for Assembly |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A02%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal%20Procurement%20Mechanisms%20for%20Assembly&rft.jtitle=Manufacturing%20&%20service%20operations%20management&rft.au=Hu,%20Bin&rft.date=2018-09-22&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=655-666&rft.issn=1523-4614&rft.eissn=1526-5498&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/msom.2017.0672&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA553628245%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c543t-6c36dc467af82697f2eb078cba03d8a6e5e477f43747855a51fe63ab615b7bd93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131589976&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A553628245&rfr_iscdi=true |