Loading…

The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996

The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Minerva (London) 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.479-503
Main Authors: Woelert, Peter, Croucher, Gwilym
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293
container_end_page 503
container_issue 4
container_start_page 479
container_title Minerva (London)
container_volume 56
creator Woelert, Peter
Croucher, Gwilym
description The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2131603018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1196308</ericid><jstor_id>45211454</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45211454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsH78ASJCQLwI0Zn9zB6lVq1UvNTzkmx2bUrbxN300P_ehIj25GkO7_dm5j1CLhDuEEDdR0SgPAXMUs0EpNkBGaFQLMVM4SEZAVCZcqnFMTmJcQkAUnAckdv5wiVv21VbNSuXPO42-bqyMal9Mo31ug7NorLJeJFvPt0ZOfL5Krrzn3lKPp4m8_FLOnt_no4fZqnlDNvUc261KKUClHnpS63BF6xkZU6VgsIrZktbFL7gTFEhQKJ3HizITAtOqWan5HrY24T6a-tia5b1Nmy6k4YiQwmsS9lROFA21DEG500TqnUedgbB9JWYoRLTwaavxPSeq8HjQmV_-ckropYMep0Oeuy0LnH4u_zf0pvBtIxtHfa_oKwzcEERueAddzlwZdXsPYtCImfsG4fXf0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131603018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Woelert, Peter ; Croucher, Gwilym</creator><creatorcontrib>Woelert, Peter ; Croucher, Gwilym</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Ausland ; Australien ; Change Strategies ; Dimensional changes ; Divergence ; Educational Change ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Hochschule ; Isomorphism ; Legal Education (Professions) ; Prüfungsordnung ; Rechtswissenschaft ; Schools ; Science and Technology Studies ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Minerva (London), 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.479-503</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0511-4176</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45211454$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45211454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1156143$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1196308$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woelert, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Gwilym</creatorcontrib><title>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996</title><title>Minerva (London)</title><addtitle>Minerva</addtitle><description>The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Australien</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Isomorphism</subject><subject>Legal Education (Professions)</subject><subject>Prüfungsordnung</subject><subject>Rechtswissenschaft</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Science and Technology Studies</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0026-4695</issn><issn>1573-1871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsH78ASJCQLwI0Zn9zB6lVq1UvNTzkmx2bUrbxN300P_ehIj25GkO7_dm5j1CLhDuEEDdR0SgPAXMUs0EpNkBGaFQLMVM4SEZAVCZcqnFMTmJcQkAUnAckdv5wiVv21VbNSuXPO42-bqyMal9Mo31ug7NorLJeJFvPt0ZOfL5Krrzn3lKPp4m8_FLOnt_no4fZqnlDNvUc261KKUClHnpS63BF6xkZU6VgsIrZktbFL7gTFEhQKJ3HizITAtOqWan5HrY24T6a-tia5b1Nmy6k4YiQwmsS9lROFA21DEG500TqnUedgbB9JWYoRLTwaavxPSeq8HjQmV_-ckropYMep0Oeuy0LnH4u_zf0pvBtIxtHfa_oKwzcEERueAddzlwZdXsPYtCImfsG4fXf0Y</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Woelert, Peter</creator><creator>Croucher, Gwilym</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-4176</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change</title><author>Woelert, Peter ; Croucher, Gwilym</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Australien</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Isomorphism</topic><topic>Legal Education (Professions)</topic><topic>Prüfungsordnung</topic><topic>Rechtswissenschaft</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Science and Technology Studies</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woelert, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Gwilym</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Minerva (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woelert, Peter</au><au>Croucher, Gwilym</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1196308</ericid><atitle>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996</atitle><jtitle>Minerva (London)</jtitle><stitle>Minerva</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>503</epage><pages>479-503</pages><issn>0026-4695</issn><eissn>1573-1871</eissn><abstract>The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-4176</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-4695
ispartof Minerva (London), 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.479-503
issn 0026-4695
1573-1871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2131603018
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Springer Nature; ERIC
subjects Ausland
Australien
Change Strategies
Dimensional changes
Divergence
Educational Change
Foreign Countries
Higher Education
Hochschule
Isomorphism
Legal Education (Professions)
Prüfungsordnung
Rechtswissenschaft
Schools
Science and Technology Studies
Social Sciences
title The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Multiple%20Dynamics%20of%20Isomorphic%20Change:%20Australian%20Law%20Schools%201987-1996&rft.jtitle=Minerva%20(London)&rft.au=Woelert,%20Peter&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=503&rft.pages=479-503&rft.issn=0026-4695&rft.eissn=1573-1871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45211454%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131603018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1196308&rft_jstor_id=45211454&rfr_iscdi=true