Loading…
The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996
The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accou...
Saved in:
Published in: | Minerva (London) 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.479-503 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293 |
container_end_page | 503 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 479 |
container_title | Minerva (London) |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Woelert, Peter Croucher, Gwilym |
description | The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2131603018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1196308</ericid><jstor_id>45211454</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45211454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsH78ASJCQLwI0Zn9zB6lVq1UvNTzkmx2bUrbxN300P_ehIj25GkO7_dm5j1CLhDuEEDdR0SgPAXMUs0EpNkBGaFQLMVM4SEZAVCZcqnFMTmJcQkAUnAckdv5wiVv21VbNSuXPO42-bqyMal9Mo31ug7NorLJeJFvPt0ZOfL5Krrzn3lKPp4m8_FLOnt_no4fZqnlDNvUc261KKUClHnpS63BF6xkZU6VgsIrZktbFL7gTFEhQKJ3HizITAtOqWan5HrY24T6a-tia5b1Nmy6k4YiQwmsS9lROFA21DEG500TqnUedgbB9JWYoRLTwaavxPSeq8HjQmV_-ckropYMep0Oeuy0LnH4u_zf0pvBtIxtHfa_oKwzcEERueAddzlwZdXsPYtCImfsG4fXf0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131603018</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Woelert, Peter ; Croucher, Gwilym</creator><creatorcontrib>Woelert, Peter ; Croucher, Gwilym</creatorcontrib><description>The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-4695</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Ausland ; Australien ; Change Strategies ; Dimensional changes ; Divergence ; Educational Change ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Hochschule ; Isomorphism ; Legal Education (Professions) ; Prüfungsordnung ; Rechtswissenschaft ; Schools ; Science and Technology Studies ; Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>Minerva (London), 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.479-503</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0511-4176</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45211454$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45211454$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1156143$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1196308$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woelert, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Gwilym</creatorcontrib><title>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996</title><title>Minerva (London)</title><addtitle>Minerva</addtitle><description>The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>Ausland</subject><subject>Australien</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Isomorphism</subject><subject>Legal Education (Professions)</subject><subject>Prüfungsordnung</subject><subject>Rechtswissenschaft</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Science and Technology Studies</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><issn>0026-4695</issn><issn>1573-1871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Lw0AQxRdRsH78ASJCQLwI0Zn9zB6lVq1UvNTzkmx2bUrbxN300P_ehIj25GkO7_dm5j1CLhDuEEDdR0SgPAXMUs0EpNkBGaFQLMVM4SEZAVCZcqnFMTmJcQkAUnAckdv5wiVv21VbNSuXPO42-bqyMal9Mo31ug7NorLJeJFvPt0ZOfL5Krrzn3lKPp4m8_FLOnt_no4fZqnlDNvUc261KKUClHnpS63BF6xkZU6VgsIrZktbFL7gTFEhQKJ3HizITAtOqWan5HrY24T6a-tia5b1Nmy6k4YiQwmsS9lROFA21DEG500TqnUedgbB9JWYoRLTwaavxPSeq8HjQmV_-ckropYMep0Oeuy0LnH4u_zf0pvBtIxtHfa_oKwzcEERueAddzlwZdXsPYtCImfsG4fXf0Y</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Woelert, Peter</creator><creator>Croucher, Gwilym</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-4176</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change</title><author>Woelert, Peter ; Croucher, Gwilym</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ausland</topic><topic>Australien</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Isomorphism</topic><topic>Legal Education (Professions)</topic><topic>Prüfungsordnung</topic><topic>Rechtswissenschaft</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Science and Technology Studies</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woelert, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Gwilym</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Minerva (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woelert, Peter</au><au>Croucher, Gwilym</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1196308</ericid><atitle>The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996</atitle><jtitle>Minerva (London)</jtitle><stitle>Minerva</stitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>479</spage><epage>503</epage><pages>479-503</pages><issn>0026-4695</issn><eissn>1573-1871</eissn><abstract>The theory of institutional isomorphism has been criticized for overemphasizing organizational convergence and neglecting organizational divergence. Drawing on a range of empirical data, this paper shows that multi-dimensional accounts of isomorphic change are not necessarily incompatible with accounts emphasizing divergence as a typical form of organizational response to environmental uncertainties. The specific case investigated is the proliferation of academic organizational units teaching law at Australian universities over a ten-year period (1987-1996) that saw far-reaching structural transformations of the Australian university system. The key heuristic strategy employed in this paper is to scrutinize (a) when isomorphic responses appear to occur, and (b) which specific organizational form they take. In the empirical case examined, scrutiny of each of these dimensions strongly suggests that at least some isomorphic responses of universities were driven by a dual agenda of manifesting not only similarity but also distinction. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-4176</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-4695 |
ispartof | Minerva (London), 2018-12, Vol.56 (4), p.479-503 |
issn | 0026-4695 1573-1871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2131603018 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Springer Nature; ERIC |
subjects | Ausland Australien Change Strategies Dimensional changes Divergence Educational Change Foreign Countries Higher Education Hochschule Isomorphism Legal Education (Professions) Prüfungsordnung Rechtswissenschaft Schools Science and Technology Studies Social Sciences |
title | The Multiple Dynamics of Isomorphic Change: Australian Law Schools 1987-1996 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T10%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Multiple%20Dynamics%20of%20Isomorphic%20Change:%20Australian%20Law%20Schools%201987-1996&rft.jtitle=Minerva%20(London)&rft.au=Woelert,%20Peter&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=479&rft.epage=503&rft.pages=479-503&rft.issn=0026-4695&rft.eissn=1573-1871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11024-018-9350-8&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45211454%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-f44c95d67016adfd990fb3d3da2770bf73cdcbbfb437255061fef0c0689542293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131603018&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1196308&rft_jstor_id=45211454&rfr_iscdi=true |