Loading…

Analytical fatigue life prediction of shot peened AA 7050-T7451

•Fatigue life of shot peened samples were predicted with the Navarro-Rios model.•The original (monotonic) and the new (cyclic) models were compared.•The cyclic damage model predicted fatigue life more accurately.•Perspectives for future work were proposed in the discussion section. Fatigue lives of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of fatigue 2019-01, Vol.118, p.271-281
Main Authors: Bianchetti, C., Delbergue, D., Bocher, Philippe, Lévesque, M., Brochu, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Fatigue life of shot peened samples were predicted with the Navarro-Rios model.•The original (monotonic) and the new (cyclic) models were compared.•The cyclic damage model predicted fatigue life more accurately.•Perspectives for future work were proposed in the discussion section. Fatigue lives of as-polished and shot peened specimens were predicted using the original Navarro-Rios model (monotonic damage model) and a more recent version of the same model (cyclic damage model). Crack closure, residual stress relaxation, cold work and cyclic yield stress were experimentally characterized and implemented within the cyclic damage model. Two shot peening conditions were studied (S230 and Z425 shots at 8A and 100% coverage). The in-depth profiles of the relaxed residual stress and cold work were experimentally characterized and implemented within both versions of the model. Two stress amplitudes leading to high cycle fatigue (HCF) and low cycle fatigue (LCF) were studied at a stress ratio of 0.1. Predictions of the cyclic damage model were globally closer to experimental fatigue lives than those predicted by the monotonic damage model. The monotonic damage model significantly overestimated fatigue life of shot peened samples in LCF. A detailed list of the used parameters and their characterization is provided. Finally, potential improvements and uses of the model for future studies are proposed.
ISSN:0142-1123
1879-3452
DOI:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.007