Loading…

Comparison of different turbulence models in pipe flow of various Reynolds numbers

In recent years, researchers have adopted different turbulence models to study turbulent flows in wall-bounded channels using computational fluid dynamics approach. Therefore, the performance comparison of turbulence models in wall-bounded turbulent flow against theoretical equations or experimental...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lim, Desmond C., Al-Kayiem, Hussain H., Kurnia, Jundika C.
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-b173889a0c7037080084a685a479b2e2a3bd29105d3953c7cb12b2f44d2f95413
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2035
creator Lim, Desmond C.
Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.
Kurnia, Jundika C.
description In recent years, researchers have adopted different turbulence models to study turbulent flows in wall-bounded channels using computational fluid dynamics approach. Therefore, the performance comparison of turbulence models in wall-bounded turbulent flow against theoretical equations or experimental data has to be studied to provide a better insight for future application of turbulent models in wall-bounded flow. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of different turbulence models through numerical analysis of friction factor and turbulence intensity of fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Finite volume method (FVM) solver with three widely studied Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS) turbulence models are adopted to investigate friction factors and turbulence intensity of fully-developed water flow in smooth pipes at various Reynolds numbers. A pipe length which is sufficiently long is adopted to neglect the effects of entrance region. The simulated results are validated against analytical equations at various inlet Reynold’s number. Results shown that RNG k-∈ turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment is the most superior model in predicting friction factor, which is an important parameter in study of pressure drop in wall-bounded flow. In addition, SST k-ω turbulent model gives the closest prediction of turbulence intensities by area (T.I.), which will provide good estimation of T.I at the boundary conditions in pipe flow using CFD.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.5075553
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2132497971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2132497971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-b173889a0c7037080084a685a479b2e2a3bd29105d3953c7cb12b2f44d2f95413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEARYMoWKsL_yDgTpia52SylOILCkJRcBeSSQIpM8mYzFT697a04M7V3Zx7LxwAbjFaYFTTB7zgSHDO6RmYYc5xJWpcn4MZQpJVhNGvS3BVygYhIoVoZmC9TP2gcygpwuShDd677OIIxymbqXOxdbBP1nUFhgiHMDjou_RzYLf7WpoKXLtdTJ0tME69cblcgwuvu-JuTjkHn89PH8vXavX-8rZ8XFUtkXSsDBa0aaRGrUBUoAahhum64ZoJaYgjmhpLJEbcUslpK1qDiSGeMUu85AzTObg77g45fU-ujGqTphz3l4pgSpgUUhyo-yNV2jDqMaSohhx6nXdqm7LC6uRLDdb_B2OkDoL_CvQXCZFsHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2132497971</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison of different turbulence models in pipe flow of various Reynolds numbers</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Lim, Desmond C. ; Al-Kayiem, Hussain H. ; Kurnia, Jundika C.</creator><contributor>Soon, William Pao King ; Mamat, Othman B. ; Nasif, Mohammad Shakir ; Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar B. ; Ya, Hamdan ; Pedapati, Srinivasa Rao</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lim, Desmond C. ; Al-Kayiem, Hussain H. ; Kurnia, Jundika C. ; Soon, William Pao King ; Mamat, Othman B. ; Nasif, Mohammad Shakir ; Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar B. ; Ya, Hamdan ; Pedapati, Srinivasa Rao</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, researchers have adopted different turbulence models to study turbulent flows in wall-bounded channels using computational fluid dynamics approach. Therefore, the performance comparison of turbulence models in wall-bounded turbulent flow against theoretical equations or experimental data has to be studied to provide a better insight for future application of turbulent models in wall-bounded flow. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of different turbulence models through numerical analysis of friction factor and turbulence intensity of fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Finite volume method (FVM) solver with three widely studied Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS) turbulence models are adopted to investigate friction factors and turbulence intensity of fully-developed water flow in smooth pipes at various Reynolds numbers. A pipe length which is sufficiently long is adopted to neglect the effects of entrance region. The simulated results are validated against analytical equations at various inlet Reynold’s number. Results shown that RNG k-∈ turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment is the most superior model in predicting friction factor, which is an important parameter in study of pressure drop in wall-bounded flow. In addition, SST k-ω turbulent model gives the closest prediction of turbulence intensities by area (T.I.), which will provide good estimation of T.I at the boundary conditions in pipe flow using CFD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/1.5075553</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Boundary conditions ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Entrances ; Finite volume method ; Fluid flow ; Friction ; Friction factor ; Numerical analysis ; Pipe flow ; Predictions ; Pressure drop ; Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method ; Simulation ; Turbulence intensity ; Turbulence models ; Turbulent flow ; Water flow</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2018, Vol.2035 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-b173889a0c7037080084a685a479b2e2a3bd29105d3953c7cb12b2f44d2f95413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Soon, William Pao King</contributor><contributor>Mamat, Othman B.</contributor><contributor>Nasif, Mohammad Shakir</contributor><contributor>Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar B.</contributor><contributor>Ya, Hamdan</contributor><contributor>Pedapati, Srinivasa Rao</contributor><creatorcontrib>Lim, Desmond C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurnia, Jundika C.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of different turbulence models in pipe flow of various Reynolds numbers</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>In recent years, researchers have adopted different turbulence models to study turbulent flows in wall-bounded channels using computational fluid dynamics approach. Therefore, the performance comparison of turbulence models in wall-bounded turbulent flow against theoretical equations or experimental data has to be studied to provide a better insight for future application of turbulent models in wall-bounded flow. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of different turbulence models through numerical analysis of friction factor and turbulence intensity of fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Finite volume method (FVM) solver with three widely studied Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS) turbulence models are adopted to investigate friction factors and turbulence intensity of fully-developed water flow in smooth pipes at various Reynolds numbers. A pipe length which is sufficiently long is adopted to neglect the effects of entrance region. The simulated results are validated against analytical equations at various inlet Reynold’s number. Results shown that RNG k-∈ turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment is the most superior model in predicting friction factor, which is an important parameter in study of pressure drop in wall-bounded flow. In addition, SST k-ω turbulent model gives the closest prediction of turbulence intensities by area (T.I.), which will provide good estimation of T.I at the boundary conditions in pipe flow using CFD.</description><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Entrances</subject><subject>Finite volume method</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Friction factor</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Pipe flow</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Pressure drop</subject><subject>Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Turbulence intensity</subject><subject>Turbulence models</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><subject>Water flow</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEARYMoWKsL_yDgTpia52SylOILCkJRcBeSSQIpM8mYzFT697a04M7V3Zx7LxwAbjFaYFTTB7zgSHDO6RmYYc5xJWpcn4MZQpJVhNGvS3BVygYhIoVoZmC9TP2gcygpwuShDd677OIIxymbqXOxdbBP1nUFhgiHMDjou_RzYLf7WpoKXLtdTJ0tME69cblcgwuvu-JuTjkHn89PH8vXavX-8rZ8XFUtkXSsDBa0aaRGrUBUoAahhum64ZoJaYgjmhpLJEbcUslpK1qDiSGeMUu85AzTObg77g45fU-ujGqTphz3l4pgSpgUUhyo-yNV2jDqMaSohhx6nXdqm7LC6uRLDdb_B2OkDoL_CvQXCZFsHA</recordid><startdate>20181113</startdate><enddate>20181113</enddate><creator>Lim, Desmond C.</creator><creator>Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.</creator><creator>Kurnia, Jundika C.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181113</creationdate><title>Comparison of different turbulence models in pipe flow of various Reynolds numbers</title><author>Lim, Desmond C. ; Al-Kayiem, Hussain H. ; Kurnia, Jundika C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-b173889a0c7037080084a685a479b2e2a3bd29105d3953c7cb12b2f44d2f95413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Entrances</topic><topic>Finite volume method</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Friction factor</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Pipe flow</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Pressure drop</topic><topic>Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Turbulence intensity</topic><topic>Turbulence models</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><topic>Water flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lim, Desmond C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurnia, Jundika C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lim, Desmond C.</au><au>Al-Kayiem, Hussain H.</au><au>Kurnia, Jundika C.</au><au>Soon, William Pao King</au><au>Mamat, Othman B.</au><au>Nasif, Mohammad Shakir</au><au>Sulaiman, Shaharin Anwar B.</au><au>Ya, Hamdan</au><au>Pedapati, Srinivasa Rao</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison of different turbulence models in pipe flow of various Reynolds numbers</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2018-11-13</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>2035</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>In recent years, researchers have adopted different turbulence models to study turbulent flows in wall-bounded channels using computational fluid dynamics approach. Therefore, the performance comparison of turbulence models in wall-bounded turbulent flow against theoretical equations or experimental data has to be studied to provide a better insight for future application of turbulent models in wall-bounded flow. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of different turbulence models through numerical analysis of friction factor and turbulence intensity of fully developed turbulent pipe flow. Finite volume method (FVM) solver with three widely studied Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS) turbulence models are adopted to investigate friction factors and turbulence intensity of fully-developed water flow in smooth pipes at various Reynolds numbers. A pipe length which is sufficiently long is adopted to neglect the effects of entrance region. The simulated results are validated against analytical equations at various inlet Reynold’s number. Results shown that RNG k-∈ turbulence model with enhanced wall treatment is the most superior model in predicting friction factor, which is an important parameter in study of pressure drop in wall-bounded flow. In addition, SST k-ω turbulent model gives the closest prediction of turbulence intensities by area (T.I.), which will provide good estimation of T.I at the boundary conditions in pipe flow using CFD.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/1.5075553</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2018, Vol.2035 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2132497971
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Boundary conditions
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
Entrances
Finite volume method
Fluid flow
Friction
Friction factor
Numerical analysis
Pipe flow
Predictions
Pressure drop
Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes method
Simulation
Turbulence intensity
Turbulence models
Turbulent flow
Water flow
title Comparison of different turbulence models in pipe flow of various Reynolds numbers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T07%3A03%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20different%20turbulence%20models%20in%20pipe%20flow%20of%20various%20Reynolds%20numbers&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Lim,%20Desmond%20C.&rft.date=2018-11-13&rft.volume=2035&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/1.5075553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2132497971%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-b173889a0c7037080084a685a479b2e2a3bd29105d3953c7cb12b2f44d2f95413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132497971&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true