Goethe's Polarity of Light and Darkness

• Published in: Journal for general philosophy of science 2018-12, Vol.49 (4), p.581-598
• Main Author: Müller, Olaf L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analysis; Criticism and interpretation; Education; Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von; Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (1749-1832); Heterogeneity; History; Light and darkness; Methodology of the Social Sciences; Newtonianism; Philosophers; Philosophy; Philosophy of Education; Philosophy of Science; Social Sciences
• ISSN: 0925-4560; 1572-8587
• DOI: 10.1007/s10838-017-9395-7

Rarely does research in the history and philosophy of science lead to new empirical results, but that is exactly what has happened in one of the essays of this special issue: Rang and Grebe-Ellis have developed new experimental techniques to perform measurements Goethe proposed 217 years ago. These measurements fit neatly with Goethe's idea of polarity—his complementary spectrum is not only an optical, but also a thermodynamical counterpart of Newton's spectrum. I use the new measurements, firstly, to argue against the asymmetries between light and darkness posited by Lyre and Schreiber; and, secondly, to explicate the alternative theory (the heterogeneity of darkness) that Goethe had introduced to urge scientific pluralism. In my replies to exegetical criticism by Böhler, Hampe and Zemplén, I show that the main goal of Goethe's Farbenlehre was indeed to expose symmetries between light and darkness. Furthermore, I argue that it is worthwhile to focus on the experiments, arguments and hypotheses of the Farbenlehre, and not merely on rhetorical, narrative or stylistical aspects, as Böhler and Hampe would have it. Goethe's criticism of Newton is often dismissed, but it is in fact surprisingly relevant today.