Analysis of ^sup 210^Pb and ^sup 210^Po emissions from coal-fired power plants

Due to the high temperature in the process of coal combustion, some of the 210Pb and 210Po in coal is released with other air pollutants into the environment. In order to evaluate the radiological impact of coal-fired power plants (CFPs) to the surrounding environment, 210Pb, stable Pb and 210Po fro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fuel (Guildford) 2019-01, Vol.236, p.278
Main Authors: Li, Jinfeng, Wang, Chuangao, Pan, Ziqiang, Jiang, Ziying, Chen, Ling, Zhang, Yanqi, Pan, Jingshun, Wang, Chunhong, Li, Jingjing, Liu, Ruirui
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Air pollution
Calibration
Coal
Coal-fired power plants
Denitrification
Desulfurization
Electric power generation
Emission
Emission measurements
Emissions
Environmental impact
Flue gas
High temperature
Impact analysis
Lead
Lead isotopes
Mass balance
Measurement methods
Pollutants
Polonium
Power plants
Radioactive materials
Raw materials
Sampling
Sampling methods
Solid wastes
Stack emissions
Ultrafines
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Due to the high temperature in the process of coal combustion, some of the 210Pb and 210Po in coal is released with other air pollutants into the environment. In order to evaluate the radiological impact of coal-fired power plants (CFPs) to the surrounding environment, 210Pb, stable Pb and 210Po from the stacks of five units of CFPs were sampled and measured in China, and stack emissions were calculated using direct measurements of flue gas and comparison of mass between raw materials and solid wastes. According to the measurements in 17 units of CFPs from China, the USA and Slovenia, the proportions of 210Pb and 210Po released from CFPs in the total input were 2.1% and 3.7% based on measurement data of flue gas. The emission ratio of stable Pb from CFPs should be correlated to that of 210Pb. The emission ratio of Pb was 1.2%, based on the measurements of flue gas in 60 units of CFPs from China, the USA, Finland and Japan, and 12% based on mass balance in 28 units of CFPs in China; there is a big discrepancy between these results. The factors considered that could have caused this discrepancy were sampling methods (especially for the capture of ultrafine particles), measurement methods, representativity of samples, and the influence of desulphurization and denitrification processes. There is an urgent need to develop novel technologies for the direct measurement of 210Pb in flue gas and the efficiency calibration of 210Pb and 210Po sampling in flue gas.
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153