Loading…

The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability

Literary disability studies emerged as a critical discipline in the 1990s. The introductory chapter to this Companion provides a light-touch overview of the development of the discipline, noting key publications and how they contributed towards shaping the discipline. The social model of disability...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reference reviews 2018-09, Vol.32 (7/8), p.22-22
Main Author: Kemp, Linda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 22
container_issue 7/8
container_start_page 22
container_title Reference reviews
container_volume 32
creator Kemp, Linda
description Literary disability studies emerged as a critical discipline in the 1990s. The introductory chapter to this Companion provides a light-touch overview of the development of the discipline, noting key publications and how they contributed towards shaping the discipline. The social model of disability “still remains the single most influential idea within disability studies” (p. 6), and this influence can be seen across different iterations within literary disability studies. The 16 essays in this Cambridge Companion build upon the revisionary research described in the introduction, providing “a wide range of critical perspectives on the ways in which literary representations of disability function” (p.9). The book is presented in two parts. The first part covers the major periods and subject areas of writing in English. The second part takes approaches suggested by key critical ideas current in literary disability studies.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/RR-04-2018-0065
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2135993192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2135993192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-c75b59a2b28fcdda159059312b20b0a45bbb63bee5ff1931f8a6caaff6645aea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkNFLwzAQh4MoOKfPvhZ8znZJm7R5lKlTKAhlPodLm2jG2s6ke9h_b8Z8EXy64_h9d9xHyD2DBWNQLZuGQkE5sIoCSHFBZqwUFS2lKi_JDJQAWjAurslNjFsAJiqpZqTYfNlshb0JvvtM3djvcfDjkE1jVvvJBpwOwWY4dNmTj2j8zk_HW3LlcBft3W-dk4-X583qldbv67fVY01bBiWnbSmMUMgNr1zbdciEAqFylgZgAAthjJG5sVY4x9LcVShbROekLARazOfk4bx3H8bvg42T3o6HMKSTmrNcqMQonlLLc6oNY4zBOr0Pvsdw1Az0SY1uGg2FPqnRJzWJWJwJ26cHd90_wB-X-Q_ZZWN8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135993192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><source>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Kemp, Linda</creator><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Linda</creatorcontrib><description>Literary disability studies emerged as a critical discipline in the 1990s. The introductory chapter to this Companion provides a light-touch overview of the development of the discipline, noting key publications and how they contributed towards shaping the discipline. The social model of disability “still remains the single most influential idea within disability studies” (p. 6), and this influence can be seen across different iterations within literary disability studies. The 16 essays in this Cambridge Companion build upon the revisionary research described in the introduction, providing “a wide range of critical perspectives on the ways in which literary representations of disability function” (p.9). The book is presented in two parts. The first part covers the major periods and subject areas of writing in English. The second part takes approaches suggested by key critical ideas current in literary disability studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-4125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-7697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/RR-04-2018-0065</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Harlow: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Disability studies ; Literature ; Nonfiction</subject><ispartof>Reference reviews, 2018-09, Vol.32 (7/8), p.22-22</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2135993192/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2135993192?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,776,780,788,21360,21373,27282,27899,27901,27902,33588,33883,34112,43709,43868,73964,74152</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Linda</creatorcontrib><title>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability</title><title>Reference reviews</title><description>Literary disability studies emerged as a critical discipline in the 1990s. The introductory chapter to this Companion provides a light-touch overview of the development of the discipline, noting key publications and how they contributed towards shaping the discipline. The social model of disability “still remains the single most influential idea within disability studies” (p. 6), and this influence can be seen across different iterations within literary disability studies. The 16 essays in this Cambridge Companion build upon the revisionary research described in the introduction, providing “a wide range of critical perspectives on the ways in which literary representations of disability function” (p.9). The book is presented in two parts. The first part covers the major periods and subject areas of writing in English. The second part takes approaches suggested by key critical ideas current in literary disability studies.</description><subject>Disability studies</subject><subject>Literature</subject><subject>Nonfiction</subject><issn>0950-4125</issn><issn>1758-7697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CNYFK</sourceid><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><sourceid>M1O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkNFLwzAQh4MoOKfPvhZ8znZJm7R5lKlTKAhlPodLm2jG2s6ke9h_b8Z8EXy64_h9d9xHyD2DBWNQLZuGQkE5sIoCSHFBZqwUFS2lKi_JDJQAWjAurslNjFsAJiqpZqTYfNlshb0JvvtM3djvcfDjkE1jVvvJBpwOwWY4dNmTj2j8zk_HW3LlcBft3W-dk4-X583qldbv67fVY01bBiWnbSmMUMgNr1zbdciEAqFylgZgAAthjJG5sVY4x9LcVShbROekLARazOfk4bx3H8bvg42T3o6HMKSTmrNcqMQonlLLc6oNY4zBOr0Pvsdw1Az0SY1uGg2FPqnRJzWJWJwJ26cHd90_wB-X-Q_ZZWN8</recordid><startdate>20180917</startdate><enddate>20180917</enddate><creator>Kemp, Linda</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CNYFK</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M1O</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180917</creationdate><title>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability</title><author>Kemp, Linda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-c75b59a2b28fcdda159059312b20b0a45bbb63bee5ff1931f8a6caaff6645aea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Disability studies</topic><topic>Literature</topic><topic>Nonfiction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kemp, Linda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Library Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Reference reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kemp, Linda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability</atitle><jtitle>Reference reviews</jtitle><date>2018-09-17</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7/8</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>22-22</pages><issn>0950-4125</issn><eissn>1758-7697</eissn><abstract>Literary disability studies emerged as a critical discipline in the 1990s. The introductory chapter to this Companion provides a light-touch overview of the development of the discipline, noting key publications and how they contributed towards shaping the discipline. The social model of disability “still remains the single most influential idea within disability studies” (p. 6), and this influence can be seen across different iterations within literary disability studies. The 16 essays in this Cambridge Companion build upon the revisionary research described in the introduction, providing “a wide range of critical perspectives on the ways in which literary representations of disability function” (p.9). The book is presented in two parts. The first part covers the major periods and subject areas of writing in English. The second part takes approaches suggested by key critical ideas current in literary disability studies.</abstract><cop>Harlow</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/RR-04-2018-0065</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-4125
ispartof Reference reviews, 2018-09, Vol.32 (7/8), p.22-22
issn 0950-4125
1758-7697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2135993192
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list); Library & Information Science Collection; ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Disability studies
Literature
Nonfiction
title The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Disability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Cambridge%20Companion%20to%20Literature%20and%20Disability&rft.jtitle=Reference%20reviews&rft.au=Kemp,%20Linda&rft.date=2018-09-17&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7/8&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=22-22&rft.issn=0950-4125&rft.eissn=1758-7697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/RR-04-2018-0065&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2135993192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1072-c75b59a2b28fcdda159059312b20b0a45bbb63bee5ff1931f8a6caaff6645aea3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135993192&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true