Loading…
The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils
Purpose Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of soils and sediments 2019-04, Vol.19 (4), p.2089-2102 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693 |
container_end_page | 2102 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 2089 |
container_title | Journal of soils and sediments |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Lv, Jiaorong Luo, Han Hu, Jinsheng Xie, Yongsheng |
description | Purpose
Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate.
Materials and methods
A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min
−1
. The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total.
Results and discussion
Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps.
Conclusions
Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2137067221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2137067221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOeBH6jjcUMVLqsSlnC3H2bQpJQ5eV9AD_47TIHHiNGvtzHh2CLnk7JozVtwg51LpjHGdCV7KbH9EJlzxPCtyzY7TnMsybZk-JWeIG8ZkkdYT8r1cA4WmAReR-oYG795oE-zqHbpIne_igL6jceAFj22a-8QCRDgosPftlq7B9nhLLd3aygcbfdhTdH4X2m5F4auH0B4cP9u4pvHTU0wqPCcnjd0iXPzilLw-3C_nT9ni5fF5frfInOQqZrWdVdIpVWibCyGk5rqYAdSulkrYQgFrRF0CMJdrKyoBOTCe3pq7WlSqlFNyNfqm5B87wGg2KVqXvjSCy4KpQiScEj6yXLoTAzSmT6lt2BvOzNCyGVs2qWUztGz2SSNGDfbDqRD-nP8X_QADy4Kj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137067221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Lv, Jiaorong ; Luo, Han ; Hu, Jinsheng ; Xie, Yongsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jiaorong ; Luo, Han ; Hu, Jinsheng ; Xie, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate.
Materials and methods
A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min
−1
. The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total.
Results and discussion
Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps.
Conclusions
Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accelerated erosion ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Clay ; Clay loam ; Correlation ; Dimensions ; Discharge ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Erosion mechanisms ; Erosion rates ; Fragmentation ; Fragments ; Inflow ; Laboratories ; Landforms ; Parameters ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Regression analysis ; Rills ; Rivers ; Rocks ; Runoff ; Sandy loam ; Scouring ; Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article ; Sediments ; Simulation ; Soil ; Soil analysis ; Soil erosion ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil types ; Spoil</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2019-04, Vol.19 (4), p.2089-2102</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Soils and Sediments is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7611-4408</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jiaorong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jinsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose
Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate.
Materials and methods
A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min
−1
. The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total.
Results and discussion
Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps.
Conclusions
Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.</description><subject>Accelerated erosion</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay loam</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Erosion mechanisms</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rills</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sandy loam</subject><subject>Scouring</subject><subject>Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Spoil</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOeBH6jjcUMVLqsSlnC3H2bQpJQ5eV9AD_47TIHHiNGvtzHh2CLnk7JozVtwg51LpjHGdCV7KbH9EJlzxPCtyzY7TnMsybZk-JWeIG8ZkkdYT8r1cA4WmAReR-oYG795oE-zqHbpIne_igL6jceAFj22a-8QCRDgosPftlq7B9nhLLd3aygcbfdhTdH4X2m5F4auH0B4cP9u4pvHTU0wqPCcnjd0iXPzilLw-3C_nT9ni5fF5frfInOQqZrWdVdIpVWibCyGk5rqYAdSulkrYQgFrRF0CMJdrKyoBOTCe3pq7WlSqlFNyNfqm5B87wGg2KVqXvjSCy4KpQiScEj6yXLoTAzSmT6lt2BvOzNCyGVs2qWUztGz2SSNGDfbDqRD-nP8X_QADy4Kj</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lv, Jiaorong</creator><creator>Luo, Han</creator><creator>Hu, Jinsheng</creator><creator>Xie, Yongsheng</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-4408</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</title><author>Lv, Jiaorong ; Luo, Han ; Hu, Jinsheng ; Xie, Yongsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accelerated erosion</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay loam</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Erosion mechanisms</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rills</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sandy loam</topic><topic>Scouring</topic><topic>Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Spoil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jiaorong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jinsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Jiaorong</au><au>Luo, Han</au><au>Hu, Jinsheng</au><au>Xie, Yongsheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2089</spage><epage>2102</epage><pages>2089-2102</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate.
Materials and methods
A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min
−1
. The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total.
Results and discussion
Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps (
R
2
= 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps.
Conclusions
Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-4408</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1439-0108 |
ispartof | Journal of soils and sediments, 2019-04, Vol.19 (4), p.2089-2102 |
issn | 1439-0108 1614-7480 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2137067221 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Accelerated erosion Catchment area Catchment areas Clay Clay loam Correlation Dimensions Discharge Earth and Environmental Science Environment Environmental Physics Erosion mechanisms Erosion rates Fragmentation Fragments Inflow Laboratories Landforms Parameters Rain Rainfall Regression analysis Rills Rivers Rocks Runoff Sandy loam Scouring Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article Sediments Simulation Soil Soil analysis Soil erosion Soil Science & Conservation Soil types Spoil |
title | The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20rock%20fragment%20content%20on%20the%20erosion%20processes%20of%20spoil%20heaps:%20a%20laboratory%20scouring%20experiment%20with%20two%20soils&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Lv,%20Jiaorong&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2089&rft.epage=2102&rft.pages=2089-2102&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2137067221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137067221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |