Loading…

The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils

Purpose Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of soils and sediments 2019-04, Vol.19 (4), p.2089-2102
Main Authors: Lv, Jiaorong, Luo, Han, Hu, Jinsheng, Xie, Yongsheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693
container_end_page 2102
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2089
container_title Journal of soils and sediments
container_volume 19
creator Lv, Jiaorong
Luo, Han
Hu, Jinsheng
Xie, Yongsheng
description Purpose Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate. Materials and methods A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min −1 . The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total. Results and discussion Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps. Conclusions Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2137067221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2137067221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOeBH6jjcUMVLqsSlnC3H2bQpJQ5eV9AD_47TIHHiNGvtzHh2CLnk7JozVtwg51LpjHGdCV7KbH9EJlzxPCtyzY7TnMsybZk-JWeIG8ZkkdYT8r1cA4WmAReR-oYG795oE-zqHbpIne_igL6jceAFj22a-8QCRDgosPftlq7B9nhLLd3aygcbfdhTdH4X2m5F4auH0B4cP9u4pvHTU0wqPCcnjd0iXPzilLw-3C_nT9ni5fF5frfInOQqZrWdVdIpVWibCyGk5rqYAdSulkrYQgFrRF0CMJdrKyoBOTCe3pq7WlSqlFNyNfqm5B87wGg2KVqXvjSCy4KpQiScEj6yXLoTAzSmT6lt2BvOzNCyGVs2qWUztGz2SSNGDfbDqRD-nP8X_QADy4Kj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137067221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Lv, Jiaorong ; Luo, Han ; Hu, Jinsheng ; Xie, Yongsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jiaorong ; Luo, Han ; Hu, Jinsheng ; Xie, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate. Materials and methods A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min −1 . The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total. Results and discussion Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps. Conclusions Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1439-0108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7480</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accelerated erosion ; Catchment area ; Catchment areas ; Clay ; Clay loam ; Correlation ; Dimensions ; Discharge ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Physics ; Erosion mechanisms ; Erosion rates ; Fragmentation ; Fragments ; Inflow ; Laboratories ; Landforms ; Parameters ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Regression analysis ; Rills ; Rivers ; Rocks ; Runoff ; Sandy loam ; Scouring ; Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article ; Sediments ; Simulation ; Soil ; Soil analysis ; Soil erosion ; Soil Science &amp; Conservation ; Soil types ; Spoil</subject><ispartof>Journal of soils and sediments, 2019-04, Vol.19 (4), p.2089-2102</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Journal of Soils and Sediments is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7611-4408</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jiaorong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jinsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</title><title>Journal of soils and sediments</title><addtitle>J Soils Sediments</addtitle><description>Purpose Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate. Materials and methods A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min −1 . The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total. Results and discussion Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps. Conclusions Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.</description><subject>Accelerated erosion</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchment areas</subject><subject>Clay</subject><subject>Clay loam</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Dimensions</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Physics</subject><subject>Erosion mechanisms</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Fragments</subject><subject>Inflow</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Rills</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>Sandy loam</subject><subject>Scouring</subject><subject>Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</subject><subject>Soil types</subject><subject>Spoil</subject><issn>1439-0108</issn><issn>1614-7480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPEOeBH6jjcUMVLqsSlnC3H2bQpJQ5eV9AD_47TIHHiNGvtzHh2CLnk7JozVtwg51LpjHGdCV7KbH9EJlzxPCtyzY7TnMsybZk-JWeIG8ZkkdYT8r1cA4WmAReR-oYG795oE-zqHbpIne_igL6jceAFj22a-8QCRDgosPftlq7B9nhLLd3aygcbfdhTdH4X2m5F4auH0B4cP9u4pvHTU0wqPCcnjd0iXPzilLw-3C_nT9ni5fF5frfInOQqZrWdVdIpVWibCyGk5rqYAdSulkrYQgFrRF0CMJdrKyoBOTCe3pq7WlSqlFNyNfqm5B87wGg2KVqXvjSCy4KpQiScEj6yXLoTAzSmT6lt2BvOzNCyGVs2qWUztGz2SSNGDfbDqRD-nP8X_QADy4Kj</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Lv, Jiaorong</creator><creator>Luo, Han</creator><creator>Hu, Jinsheng</creator><creator>Xie, Yongsheng</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-4408</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</title><author>Lv, Jiaorong ; Luo, Han ; Hu, Jinsheng ; Xie, Yongsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accelerated erosion</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchment areas</topic><topic>Clay</topic><topic>Clay loam</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Dimensions</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Physics</topic><topic>Erosion mechanisms</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Fragments</topic><topic>Inflow</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Rills</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>Sandy loam</topic><topic>Scouring</topic><topic>Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>Soil Science &amp; Conservation</topic><topic>Soil types</topic><topic>Spoil</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Jiaorong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Jinsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Yongsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Jiaorong</au><au>Luo, Han</au><au>Hu, Jinsheng</au><au>Xie, Yongsheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils</atitle><jtitle>Journal of soils and sediments</jtitle><stitle>J Soils Sediments</stitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2089</spage><epage>2102</epage><pages>2089-2102</pages><issn>1439-0108</issn><eissn>1614-7480</eissn><abstract>Purpose Spoil heaps on newly engineered landforms create extensive artificially accelerated erosion, especially when there are catchment areas above spoil heaps, erosion caused by runoff will be much greater than that induced by rainfall. This study investigated the erosional characteristics of clay loam and sandy loam spoil heaps and proposed an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the variation in erosion rate. Materials and methods A laboratory scouring experiment was conducted using a soil pan (dimensions 5 m × 1 m × 0.5 m deep) with a discharging arrangement to test four samples of clay loam and sandy loam containing rock fragments (0%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) by mass. The slope of simulated spoil heaps was 53.2% with a discharging inflow rate of 15 L min −1 . The rock fragments used were those commonly used in construction works, having a diameter of 2–3 cm and irregular shape. Twenty-four scouring tests for eight treatments with duplication were accomplished in total. Results and discussion Average erosion rates showed a negative linear correlation with rock fragment content in clay spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.94) and a positive linear correlation in sandy loam spoil heaps ( R 2  = 0.92). Rill width evolution of clay loam spoil heaps mainly developed at the early scouring stage (0–15 min), and rills developed even more rapidly during later scouring times (30–60 min) in sandy loam spoil heaps. Grey relational analysis showed that sheer stress and stream power both had higher Grey relational degrees with erosion rate for both soils, regression analysis showed that stream power can efficiently describe the erosional process of clay loam and sandy loam for each rock fragment content, but sheer stress only did well in sandy loam heaps. Conclusions Adding rock fragments to spoil heaps resulted in significantly opposite effects in the different soils; great attention should be paid to sandy loam spoil heaps due to their more severe erosion with increasing rock fragment content; stream power is an appropriate hydraulic parameter to simulate the soil erosion process of spoil heaps for both soil types.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7611-4408</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1439-0108
ispartof Journal of soils and sediments, 2019-04, Vol.19 (4), p.2089-2102
issn 1439-0108
1614-7480
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2137067221
source Springer Link
subjects Accelerated erosion
Catchment area
Catchment areas
Clay
Clay loam
Correlation
Dimensions
Discharge
Earth and Environmental Science
Environment
Environmental Physics
Erosion mechanisms
Erosion rates
Fragmentation
Fragments
Inflow
Laboratories
Landforms
Parameters
Rain
Rainfall
Regression analysis
Rills
Rivers
Rocks
Runoff
Sandy loam
Scouring
Sec 3 • Hillslope and River Basin Sediment Dynamics • Research Article
Sediments
Simulation
Soil
Soil analysis
Soil erosion
Soil Science & Conservation
Soil types
Spoil
title The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps: a laboratory scouring experiment with two soils
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A53%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20rock%20fragment%20content%20on%20the%20erosion%20processes%20of%20spoil%20heaps:%20a%20laboratory%20scouring%20experiment%20with%20two%20soils&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20soils%20and%20sediments&rft.au=Lv,%20Jiaorong&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2089&rft.epage=2102&rft.pages=2089-2102&rft.issn=1439-0108&rft.eissn=1614-7480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11368-018-2193-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2137067221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-da5b3c6678a4222381875eedcd362a76e0f2d9ee0c48a2b2e4e019ee81cd2b693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137067221&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true