Loading…
Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?
My point of departure in the book Meeting Needs was the conviction that the concept of needs has moral force, but the force has been dissipated and anyway made hard to see by multiple complications including but not confined to multiple abuses. I now think that is only half the problem.
Saved in:
Published in: | Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement 2005-12, Vol.57, p.209-228 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 228 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Braybrooke, David |
description | My point of departure in the book Meeting Needs was the conviction that the concept of needs has moral force, but the force has been dissipated and anyway made hard to see by multiple complications including but not confined to multiple abuses. I now think that is only half the problem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1358246105057115 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2138559551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1358246105057115</cupid><sourcerecordid>2138559551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1521-f2cf011b69700838a8f2dd0dd8d21754fd59102ebea9bcecb8fc8b0d9e6e9c573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIHcLPEOeBNsnmcEESkILWg8jxaib2mLW1c7FSCv8elFRwQp33MzM5og-AY-ClwyM4eIMY8SlLgyDEDwJ2gBxliGCPiru89HK7x_eDAuRnnScZ52gvKlwlZYsqQY92E2MjYes4qYyUxo79XpWklLbv1eEukHLsnN1XE6lYxr27PD4M9Xc8dHW1rP3iqrh7L63B4N7gpL4ahBIwg1JHUHKBJC2-dx3md60gprlSuIh810QoL4BE1VBeNJNnkWuYNVwWlVEjM4n5wsrm7tOZ9Ra4TM7OyrbcUEcQ5YoEIngUblrTGOUtaLO10UdtPAVysfyX-_Mprwo1m6jr6-BHU9k2kWZyhSAdj8VyN4JJXY5F4frz1qBeNnapX-o3yv8sXLAJ4GA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2138559551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Braybrooke, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Braybrooke, David</creatorcontrib><description>My point of departure in the book Meeting Needs was the conviction that the concept of needs has moral force, but the force has been dissipated and anyway made hard to see by multiple complications including but not confined to multiple abuses. I now think that is only half the problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1358-2461</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3555</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1358246105057115</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Morality</subject><ispartof>Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement, 2005-12, Vol.57, p.209-228</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2005</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2138559551/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2138559551?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12860,27923,27924,34774,44199,72831,74599</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braybrooke, David</creatorcontrib><title>Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?</title><title>Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement</title><addtitle>Roy. Inst. Philos. Suppl</addtitle><description>My point of departure in the book Meeting Needs was the conviction that the concept of needs has moral force, but the force has been dissipated and anyway made hard to see by multiple complications including but not confined to multiple abuses. I now think that is only half the problem.</description><subject>Morality</subject><issn>1358-2461</issn><issn>1755-3555</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQjBBIlMIHcLPEOeBNsnmcEESkILWg8jxaib2mLW1c7FSCv8elFRwQp33MzM5og-AY-ClwyM4eIMY8SlLgyDEDwJ2gBxliGCPiru89HK7x_eDAuRnnScZ52gvKlwlZYsqQY92E2MjYes4qYyUxo79XpWklLbv1eEukHLsnN1XE6lYxr27PD4M9Xc8dHW1rP3iqrh7L63B4N7gpL4ahBIwg1JHUHKBJC2-dx3md60gprlSuIh810QoL4BE1VBeNJNnkWuYNVwWlVEjM4n5wsrm7tOZ9Ra4TM7OyrbcUEcQ5YoEIngUblrTGOUtaLO10UdtPAVysfyX-_Mprwo1m6jr6-BHU9k2kWZyhSAdj8VyN4JJXY5F4frz1qBeNnapX-o3yv8sXLAJ4GA</recordid><startdate>200512</startdate><enddate>200512</enddate><creator>Braybrooke, David</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200512</creationdate><title>Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?</title><author>Braybrooke, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1521-f2cf011b69700838a8f2dd0dd8d21754fd59102ebea9bcecb8fc8b0d9e6e9c573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Morality</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braybrooke, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braybrooke, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When?</atitle><jtitle>Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement</jtitle><addtitle>Roy. Inst. Philos. Suppl</addtitle><date>2005-12</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>209</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>209-228</pages><issn>1358-2461</issn><eissn>1755-3555</eissn><abstract>My point of departure in the book Meeting Needs was the conviction that the concept of needs has moral force, but the force has been dissipated and anyway made hard to see by multiple complications including but not confined to multiple abuses. I now think that is only half the problem.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1358246105057115</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1358-2461 |
ispartof | Royal Institute of Philosophy supplement, 2005-12, Vol.57, p.209-228 |
issn | 1358-2461 1755-3555 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2138559551 |
source | Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Morality |
title | Where does the Moral Force of the Concept of Needs Reside and When? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A45%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Where%20does%20the%20Moral%20Force%20of%20the%20Concept%20of%20Needs%20Reside%20and%20When?&rft.jtitle=Royal%20Institute%20of%20Philosophy%20supplement&rft.au=Braybrooke,%20David&rft.date=2005-12&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=209-228&rft.issn=1358-2461&rft.eissn=1755-3555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1358246105057115&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2138559551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1521-f2cf011b69700838a8f2dd0dd8d21754fd59102ebea9bcecb8fc8b0d9e6e9c573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2138559551&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1358246105057115&rfr_iscdi=true |