Loading…
PS-374 A Comparison Of Treatment At Home Or In Hospital For Moderate/severe Cellulitis In Children
Background and aimsAdults with cellulitis are commonly receive IV antibiotics via hospital-in-the-home (HITH). Children are usually admitted to hospital. Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) HITH and offers once daily IV ceftriaxone for cellulitis. Concerns remain for some physicians about its anti-staph...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A246-A247 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1942-9e7b0c362db7d7b0c409621469f1d4d024930b8a8721c4d68b0b2adead3724103 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A247 |
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A246 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Hopper, SM Ibrahim, LF Babl, FE Bryant, PA |
description | Background and aimsAdults with cellulitis are commonly receive IV antibiotics via hospital-in-the-home (HITH). Children are usually admitted to hospital. Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) HITH and offers once daily IV ceftriaxone for cellulitis. Concerns remain for some physicians about its anti-staphylococcal activity. We aim to compare the clinical features and outcomes of patients with cellulitis admitted to hospital with IV flucloxacillin to those treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients with cellulitis treated with IV antibiotics. Exclusions- complicated cellulitis (abscess, orbital cellulitis, post-operative cellulitis, bites and immunosuppression). Demographics, clinical and microbiological features, antibiotic management and outcomes are related to two groups: inpatients treated with IV flucloxacillin and HITH patients treated with IV ceftriaxone.ResultsOver 17 months (2012–2014), 745 children presented to ED with cellulitis: 353 (47%) received IV antibiotics; 169 were excluded (complicated cellulitis, comorbidities, misdiagnosis or miscoding), leaving 184. 47 (26%) were admitted to HITH and 137 (74%) were admitted as inpatients. Initial treatment was IV ceftriaxone in 41 (87%) of HITH patients and IV flucloxacillin in 103 (75%) of inpatients.HITH patients were older, more likely to have failed prior oral antibiotics, less likely to have periorbital rather than limb cellulitis. Inpatients required longer IV treatment. Readmission rates, adverse events and rates of change of treatment were similar.ConclusionSome children with moderate/severe cellulitis can be treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone in this non-randomised study however further prospective work is required to define the most appropriate sub-group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.672 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2139155028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2139155028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1942-9e7b0c362db7d7b0c409621469f1d4d024930b8a8721c4d68b0b2adead3724103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMtKw0AUhgdRsFbfYUC3ac9cmkzATQlqC5UK1vUwyZzQlCQTZ1LBnRtf1CcxoS5cnZ_Dx7l8hNwxmDEm4rnxxd5WodhXtY04MBkJSISSszjhZ2TCZKyGtpTnZAIAIkqVUpfkKoQDAONKiQmxL6-RSOTP1_eSZq7pjK-Ca-m2pDuPpm-w7emypyvXIN16um6HGLqqNzV9dJ4-O4ve9DgP-IEeaYZ1fayrvgojmo2HeWyvyUVp6oA3f3VK3h4fdtkq2myf1tlyExUslTxKMcmhEDG3eWLHKCGN-fBFWjIrLXCZCsiVUQlnhbSxyiHnxqKxIuGSgZiS29Pczrv3I4ZeH9zRt8NKzZlI2WIBXA3U_YkqvAvBY6k7XzXGf2oGevSq_3vVo1d98qoHr-IXlJduwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2139155028</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PS-374 A Comparison Of Treatment At Home Or In Hospital For Moderate/severe Cellulitis In Children</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Hopper, SM ; Ibrahim, LF ; Babl, FE ; Bryant, PA</creator><creatorcontrib>Hopper, SM ; Ibrahim, LF ; Babl, FE ; Bryant, PA</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aimsAdults with cellulitis are commonly receive IV antibiotics via hospital-in-the-home (HITH). Children are usually admitted to hospital. Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) HITH and offers once daily IV ceftriaxone for cellulitis. Concerns remain for some physicians about its anti-staphylococcal activity. We aim to compare the clinical features and outcomes of patients with cellulitis admitted to hospital with IV flucloxacillin to those treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients with cellulitis treated with IV antibiotics. Exclusions- complicated cellulitis (abscess, orbital cellulitis, post-operative cellulitis, bites and immunosuppression). Demographics, clinical and microbiological features, antibiotic management and outcomes are related to two groups: inpatients treated with IV flucloxacillin and HITH patients treated with IV ceftriaxone.ResultsOver 17 months (2012–2014), 745 children presented to ED with cellulitis: 353 (47%) received IV antibiotics; 169 were excluded (complicated cellulitis, comorbidities, misdiagnosis or miscoding), leaving 184. 47 (26%) were admitted to HITH and 137 (74%) were admitted as inpatients. Initial treatment was IV ceftriaxone in 41 (87%) of HITH patients and IV flucloxacillin in 103 (75%) of inpatients.HITH patients were older, more likely to have failed prior oral antibiotics, less likely to have periorbital rather than limb cellulitis. Inpatients required longer IV treatment. Readmission rates, adverse events and rates of change of treatment were similar.ConclusionSome children with moderate/severe cellulitis can be treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone in this non-randomised study however further prospective work is required to define the most appropriate sub-group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Abscesses ; Antibiotics ; Ceftriaxone ; Cellulitis ; Children ; Demography ; Flucloxacillin ; Hospitals ; Immunosuppression ; Orbital cellulitis ; Patients</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A246-A247</ispartof><rights>2014 2014, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1942-9e7b0c362db7d7b0c409621469f1d4d024930b8a8721c4d68b0b2adead3724103</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2139155028/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2139155028?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21378,21394,27924,27925,33611,33877,43733,43880,74221,74397</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hopper, SM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, LF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babl, FE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, PA</creatorcontrib><title>PS-374 A Comparison Of Treatment At Home Or In Hospital For Moderate/severe Cellulitis In Children</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><description>Background and aimsAdults with cellulitis are commonly receive IV antibiotics via hospital-in-the-home (HITH). Children are usually admitted to hospital. Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) HITH and offers once daily IV ceftriaxone for cellulitis. Concerns remain for some physicians about its anti-staphylococcal activity. We aim to compare the clinical features and outcomes of patients with cellulitis admitted to hospital with IV flucloxacillin to those treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients with cellulitis treated with IV antibiotics. Exclusions- complicated cellulitis (abscess, orbital cellulitis, post-operative cellulitis, bites and immunosuppression). Demographics, clinical and microbiological features, antibiotic management and outcomes are related to two groups: inpatients treated with IV flucloxacillin and HITH patients treated with IV ceftriaxone.ResultsOver 17 months (2012–2014), 745 children presented to ED with cellulitis: 353 (47%) received IV antibiotics; 169 were excluded (complicated cellulitis, comorbidities, misdiagnosis or miscoding), leaving 184. 47 (26%) were admitted to HITH and 137 (74%) were admitted as inpatients. Initial treatment was IV ceftriaxone in 41 (87%) of HITH patients and IV flucloxacillin in 103 (75%) of inpatients.HITH patients were older, more likely to have failed prior oral antibiotics, less likely to have periorbital rather than limb cellulitis. Inpatients required longer IV treatment. Readmission rates, adverse events and rates of change of treatment were similar.ConclusionSome children with moderate/severe cellulitis can be treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone in this non-randomised study however further prospective work is required to define the most appropriate sub-group.</description><subject>Abscesses</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Ceftriaxone</subject><subject>Cellulitis</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Flucloxacillin</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Orbital cellulitis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMtKw0AUhgdRsFbfYUC3ac9cmkzATQlqC5UK1vUwyZzQlCQTZ1LBnRtf1CcxoS5cnZ_Dx7l8hNwxmDEm4rnxxd5WodhXtY04MBkJSISSszjhZ2TCZKyGtpTnZAIAIkqVUpfkKoQDAONKiQmxL6-RSOTP1_eSZq7pjK-Ca-m2pDuPpm-w7emypyvXIN16um6HGLqqNzV9dJ4-O4ve9DgP-IEeaYZ1fayrvgojmo2HeWyvyUVp6oA3f3VK3h4fdtkq2myf1tlyExUslTxKMcmhEDG3eWLHKCGN-fBFWjIrLXCZCsiVUQlnhbSxyiHnxqKxIuGSgZiS29Pczrv3I4ZeH9zRt8NKzZlI2WIBXA3U_YkqvAvBY6k7XzXGf2oGevSq_3vVo1d98qoHr-IXlJduwg</recordid><startdate>201410</startdate><enddate>201410</enddate><creator>Hopper, SM</creator><creator>Ibrahim, LF</creator><creator>Babl, FE</creator><creator>Bryant, PA</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201410</creationdate><title>PS-374 A Comparison Of Treatment At Home Or In Hospital For Moderate/severe Cellulitis In Children</title><author>Hopper, SM ; Ibrahim, LF ; Babl, FE ; Bryant, PA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1942-9e7b0c362db7d7b0c409621469f1d4d024930b8a8721c4d68b0b2adead3724103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Abscesses</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Ceftriaxone</topic><topic>Cellulitis</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Flucloxacillin</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Orbital cellulitis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hopper, SM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, LF</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babl, FE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryant, PA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hopper, SM</au><au>Ibrahim, LF</au><au>Babl, FE</au><au>Bryant, PA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PS-374 A Comparison Of Treatment At Home Or In Hospital For Moderate/severe Cellulitis In Children</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><date>2014-10</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A246</spage><epage>A247</epage><pages>A246-A247</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><abstract>Background and aimsAdults with cellulitis are commonly receive IV antibiotics via hospital-in-the-home (HITH). Children are usually admitted to hospital. Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) HITH and offers once daily IV ceftriaxone for cellulitis. Concerns remain for some physicians about its anti-staphylococcal activity. We aim to compare the clinical features and outcomes of patients with cellulitis admitted to hospital with IV flucloxacillin to those treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients with cellulitis treated with IV antibiotics. Exclusions- complicated cellulitis (abscess, orbital cellulitis, post-operative cellulitis, bites and immunosuppression). Demographics, clinical and microbiological features, antibiotic management and outcomes are related to two groups: inpatients treated with IV flucloxacillin and HITH patients treated with IV ceftriaxone.ResultsOver 17 months (2012–2014), 745 children presented to ED with cellulitis: 353 (47%) received IV antibiotics; 169 were excluded (complicated cellulitis, comorbidities, misdiagnosis or miscoding), leaving 184. 47 (26%) were admitted to HITH and 137 (74%) were admitted as inpatients. Initial treatment was IV ceftriaxone in 41 (87%) of HITH patients and IV flucloxacillin in 103 (75%) of inpatients.HITH patients were older, more likely to have failed prior oral antibiotics, less likely to have periorbital rather than limb cellulitis. Inpatients required longer IV treatment. Readmission rates, adverse events and rates of change of treatment were similar.ConclusionSome children with moderate/severe cellulitis can be treated via HITH with IV ceftriaxone in this non-randomised study however further prospective work is required to define the most appropriate sub-group.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.672</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2014-10, Vol.99 (Suppl 2), p.A246-A247 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2139155028 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Abscesses Antibiotics Ceftriaxone Cellulitis Children Demography Flucloxacillin Hospitals Immunosuppression Orbital cellulitis Patients |
title | PS-374 A Comparison Of Treatment At Home Or In Hospital For Moderate/severe Cellulitis In Children |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PS-374%E2%80%85A%20Comparison%20Of%20Treatment%20At%20Home%20Or%20In%20Hospital%20For%20Moderate/severe%20Cellulitis%20In%20Children&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Hopper,%20SM&rft.date=2014-10&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A246&rft.epage=A247&rft.pages=A246-A247&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2014-307384.672&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2139155028%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1942-9e7b0c362db7d7b0c409621469f1d4d024930b8a8721c4d68b0b2adead3724103%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2139155028&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |