A Multitrait-Multimethod Validity Assessment of the Verbal Aggressiveness and Argumentativeness Scales

The construct validity of Infante and Wigley's verbal aggressiveness scale and Infante and Rancer's argumentativeness scale are assessed with confirmatory factor analysis and multitrait-multimethod analysis. The factor analytic data replicate previous findings that the verbal aggressivenes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Communication monographs 2009-12, Vol.76 (4), p.443-462
Main Authors: Kotowski, Michael R., Levine, Timothy R., Baker, Colin R., Bolt, Jeffrey M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aggressiveness
Argumentativeness
Communication
Discriminant analysis
Multitrait-Multimethod
Validation studies
Verbal Aggressiveness
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The construct validity of Infante and Wigley's verbal aggressiveness scale and Infante and Rancer's argumentativeness scale are assessed with confirmatory factor analysis and multitrait-multimethod analysis. The factor analytic data replicate previous findings that the verbal aggressiveness scale measures two constructs, verbal aggressiveness and verbal benevolence communication style, and that the argumentativeness scale is unidimensional with some poor items. The multimethod data, however, show near zero correlations between self-reports and observed behavior and evidence of method variance. These data indicate a discrepancy between conceptual definitions and behaviors. Rather than measuring behavioral dispositions to communicate argumentatively or aggressively, the scales may function as attitude or self-concept scales.
ISSN:0363-7751
1479-5787
DOI:10.1080/03637750903300247