Treatment non-negotiables: why we need them and how to make them work

In this paper, we define mandatory treatment components as ‘treatment non‐negotiables’ and suggest that the manner in which non‐negotiables are set and implemented has a significant impact on therapeutic alliance and outcome in the eating disorders. Common non‐negotiable difficulties are reviewed an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European eating disorders review 2006-07, Vol.14 (4), p.212-217
Main Authors: Geller, Josie, Srikameswaran, Suja
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
collaborative stance
Eating disorders
mandatory treatment components
Mental health care
non-negotiables
Therapist patient relationships
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943
container_end_page 217
container_issue 4
container_start_page 212
container_title European eating disorders review
container_volume 14
creator Geller, Josie
Srikameswaran, Suja
description In this paper, we define mandatory treatment components as ‘treatment non‐negotiables’ and suggest that the manner in which non‐negotiables are set and implemented has a significant impact on therapeutic alliance and outcome in the eating disorders. Common non‐negotiable difficulties are reviewed and a philosophy is provided that can be applied to all stages of treatment: non‐negotiables need to have a sound rationale, be consistently implemented, not take the client by surprise, and maximize client autonomy. We do not believe that a given non‐negotiable is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, but rather that treatment non‐negotiables are optimally developed in response to the client population, treatment setting, clinician values and beliefs about change, and client and clinician input and experience. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/erv.716
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214481938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1125238671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p_gvBFx-kM7-WJr7pnJswFHQ68CWk7dXVbc1MOuv-ezsqvgkHdxwf7uCL0CklPUoIuwT_1Yup3EMdSrSOiJZqfzfHLBKU80N0FMIHIc2-rzpoOPVgqxWUFS5dGZXw7qrCJksIV7ieb3ENuATIcDWHFbZlhueuxpXDK7uAdlk7vzhGB7ldBjj57V30cjecDsbR5HF0P7ieRClnUkapkpY3BTrhOmUy5zxRIsst6zNGBMmFyCUVFOIEZKo5SxQHlllgMRNMC95FZ-3dtXefGwiV-XAbXzYvDaNCKKq5atB5i1LvQvCQm7UvVtZvDSVmF5FpIjJNRI28aGVdLGH7HzPDp9dWR60uQgXff9r6hZExj_tm9jAy4zc6e75VN0byH0VwdKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214481938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment non-negotiables: why we need them and how to make them work</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Geller, Josie ; Srikameswaran, Suja</creator><creatorcontrib>Geller, Josie ; Srikameswaran, Suja</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we define mandatory treatment components as ‘treatment non‐negotiables’ and suggest that the manner in which non‐negotiables are set and implemented has a significant impact on therapeutic alliance and outcome in the eating disorders. Common non‐negotiable difficulties are reviewed and a philosophy is provided that can be applied to all stages of treatment: non‐negotiables need to have a sound rationale, be consistently implemented, not take the client by surprise, and maximize client autonomy. We do not believe that a given non‐negotiable is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, but rather that treatment non‐negotiables are optimally developed in response to the client population, treatment setting, clinician values and beliefs about change, and client and clinician input and experience. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1072-4133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/erv.716</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>collaborative stance ; Eating disorders ; mandatory treatment components ; Mental health care ; non-negotiables ; Therapist patient relationships</subject><ispartof>European eating disorders review, 2006-07, Vol.14 (4), p.212-217</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. and Eating Disorders Association</rights><rights>Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jul/Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geller, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srikameswaran, Suja</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment non-negotiables: why we need them and how to make them work</title><title>European eating disorders review</title><addtitle>Eur. Eat. Disorders Rev</addtitle><description>In this paper, we define mandatory treatment components as ‘treatment non‐negotiables’ and suggest that the manner in which non‐negotiables are set and implemented has a significant impact on therapeutic alliance and outcome in the eating disorders. Common non‐negotiable difficulties are reviewed and a philosophy is provided that can be applied to all stages of treatment: non‐negotiables need to have a sound rationale, be consistently implemented, not take the client by surprise, and maximize client autonomy. We do not believe that a given non‐negotiable is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, but rather that treatment non‐negotiables are optimally developed in response to the client population, treatment setting, clinician values and beliefs about change, and client and clinician input and experience. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</description><subject>collaborative stance</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>mandatory treatment components</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>non-negotiables</subject><subject>Therapist patient relationships</subject><issn>1072-4133</issn><issn>1099-0968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10N9LwzAQB_AgCs4p_gvBFx-kM7-WJr7pnJswFHQ68CWk7dXVbc1MOuv-ezsqvgkHdxwf7uCL0CklPUoIuwT_1Yup3EMdSrSOiJZqfzfHLBKU80N0FMIHIc2-rzpoOPVgqxWUFS5dGZXw7qrCJksIV7ieb3ENuATIcDWHFbZlhueuxpXDK7uAdlk7vzhGB7ldBjj57V30cjecDsbR5HF0P7ieRClnUkapkpY3BTrhOmUy5zxRIsst6zNGBMmFyCUVFOIEZKo5SxQHlllgMRNMC95FZ-3dtXefGwiV-XAbXzYvDaNCKKq5atB5i1LvQvCQm7UvVtZvDSVmF5FpIjJNRI28aGVdLGH7HzPDp9dWR60uQgXff9r6hZExj_tm9jAy4zc6e75VN0byH0VwdKw</recordid><startdate>200607</startdate><enddate>200607</enddate><creator>Geller, Josie</creator><creator>Srikameswaran, Suja</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200607</creationdate><title>Treatment non-negotiables: why we need them and how to make them work</title><author>Geller, Josie ; Srikameswaran, Suja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>collaborative stance</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>mandatory treatment components</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>non-negotiables</topic><topic>Therapist patient relationships</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geller, Josie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srikameswaran, Suja</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>European eating disorders review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geller, Josie</au><au>Srikameswaran, Suja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment non-negotiables: why we need them and how to make them work</atitle><jtitle>European eating disorders review</jtitle><addtitle>Eur. Eat. Disorders Rev</addtitle><date>2006-07</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>212-217</pages><issn>1072-4133</issn><eissn>1099-0968</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we define mandatory treatment components as ‘treatment non‐negotiables’ and suggest that the manner in which non‐negotiables are set and implemented has a significant impact on therapeutic alliance and outcome in the eating disorders. Common non‐negotiable difficulties are reviewed and a philosophy is provided that can be applied to all stages of treatment: non‐negotiables need to have a sound rationale, be consistently implemented, not take the client by surprise, and maximize client autonomy. We do not believe that a given non‐negotiable is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, but rather that treatment non‐negotiables are optimally developed in response to the client population, treatment setting, clinician values and beliefs about change, and client and clinician input and experience. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/erv.716</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1072-4133
ispartof European eating disorders review, 2006-07, Vol.14 (4), p.212-217
issn 1072-4133
1099-0968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214481938
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects collaborative stance
Eating disorders
mandatory treatment components
Mental health care
non-negotiables
Therapist patient relationships
title Treatment non-negotiables: why we need them and how to make them work
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20non-negotiables:%20why%20we%20need%20them%20and%20how%20to%20make%20them%20work&rft.jtitle=European%20eating%20disorders%20review&rft.au=Geller,%20Josie&rft.date=2006-07&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=212-217&rft.issn=1072-4133&rft.eissn=1099-0968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/erv.716&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1125238671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3266-c86a36a3e9b39c26f33b84dfa2522040f44f6141e7be6c932b83e2dae27242943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214481938&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true