The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?

The diatribal features found in Romans 5 are examined in light of recent work in Pauline rhetoric.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Biblical literature 1991-12, Vol.110 (4), p.655-677
Main Author: Porter, Stanley E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bible
Classical literature
Dialogism
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Literary genres
New Testament
Reconciliation
Religious literature
Rhetoric
Rhetorical dialogue
Rhetorical questions
Subjunctive mood
Theology
Verbs
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1266-bc5b8f61ae95d6912c138841ed5482e7c965ab5118fc54e851dd74802131d293
cites
container_end_page 677
container_issue 4
container_start_page 655
container_title Journal of Biblical literature
container_volume 110
creator Porter, Stanley E.
description The diatribal features found in Romans 5 are examined in light of recent work in Pauline rhetoric.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3267664
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214618396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3267664</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3267664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1266-bc5b8f61ae95d6912c138841ed5482e7c965ab5118fc54e851dd74802131d293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9PAjEUxBujiYjGr9AYE0-rff23rRdDUNQEYyTcN6X7KouwxRYOfHuXwNXTO8wvM_OGkGtg91yw8kFwXWotT0gPrJCFMKU-JT3GOBSWCzgnFzkvGAMoDfTIaDpHOkjf2xW2GxoDncSVazNVj3ToWuroZI6bmBrvlvRri3nTxJZ-uB_spOcmBEzYeny6JGfBLTNeHW-fTEcv0-FbMf58fR8OxoUHrnUx82pmggaHVtXaAvcgjJGAtZKGY-mtVm6mAEzwSqJRUNelNF13ATW3ok9uDrbrFH_3bapF3Ka2S6w4SA1GWN1BdwfIp5hzwlCtU7NyaVcBq_YTVceJOvL2QC5y9-O_2B-Sr1_2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214618396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals</source><creator>Porter, Stanley E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><description>The diatribal features found in Romans 5 are examined in light of recent work in Pauline rhetoric.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9231</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-3876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3267664</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBILAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature</publisher><subject>Bible ; Classical literature ; Dialogism ; Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics ; Literary genres ; New Testament ; Reconciliation ; Religious literature ; Rhetoric ; Rhetorical dialogue ; Rhetorical questions ; Subjunctive mood ; Theology ; Verbs</subject><ispartof>Journal of Biblical literature, 1991-12, Vol.110 (4), p.655-677</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Biblical Literature Winter 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1266-bc5b8f61ae95d6912c138841ed5482e7c965ab5118fc54e851dd74802131d293</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3267664$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3267664$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><title>The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?</title><title>Journal of Biblical literature</title><description>The diatribal features found in Romans 5 are examined in light of recent work in Pauline rhetoric.</description><subject>Bible</subject><subject>Classical literature</subject><subject>Dialogism</subject><subject>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</subject><subject>Literary genres</subject><subject>New Testament</subject><subject>Reconciliation</subject><subject>Religious literature</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Rhetorical dialogue</subject><subject>Rhetorical questions</subject><subject>Subjunctive mood</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><issn>0021-9231</issn><issn>1934-3876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9PAjEUxBujiYjGr9AYE0-rff23rRdDUNQEYyTcN6X7KouwxRYOfHuXwNXTO8wvM_OGkGtg91yw8kFwXWotT0gPrJCFMKU-JT3GOBSWCzgnFzkvGAMoDfTIaDpHOkjf2xW2GxoDncSVazNVj3ToWuroZI6bmBrvlvRri3nTxJZ-uB_spOcmBEzYeny6JGfBLTNeHW-fTEcv0-FbMf58fR8OxoUHrnUx82pmggaHVtXaAvcgjJGAtZKGY-mtVm6mAEzwSqJRUNelNF13ATW3ok9uDrbrFH_3bapF3Ka2S6w4SA1GWN1BdwfIp5hzwlCtU7NyaVcBq_YTVceJOvL2QC5y9-O_2B-Sr1_2</recordid><startdate>19911201</startdate><enddate>19911201</enddate><creator>Porter, Stanley E.</creator><general>Society of Biblical Literature</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19911201</creationdate><title>The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?</title><author>Porter, Stanley E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1266-bc5b8f61ae95d6912c138841ed5482e7c965ab5118fc54e851dd74802131d293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Bible</topic><topic>Classical literature</topic><topic>Dialogism</topic><topic>Exegesis &amp; hermeneutics</topic><topic>Literary genres</topic><topic>New Testament</topic><topic>Reconciliation</topic><topic>Religious literature</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Rhetorical dialogue</topic><topic>Rhetorical questions</topic><topic>Subjunctive mood</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Porter, Stanley E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><jtitle>Journal of Biblical literature</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Porter, Stanley E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Biblical literature</jtitle><date>1991-12-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>655</spage><epage>677</epage><pages>655-677</pages><issn>0021-9231</issn><eissn>1934-3876</eissn><coden>JBILAB</coden><abstract>The diatribal features found in Romans 5 are examined in light of recent work in Pauline rhetoric.</abstract><cop>Atlanta</cop><pub>Society of Biblical Literature</pub><doi>10.2307/3267664</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9231
ispartof Journal of Biblical literature, 1991-12, Vol.110 (4), p.655-677
issn 0021-9231
1934-3876
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214618396
source JSTOR Archival Journals
subjects Bible
Classical literature
Dialogism
Exegesis & hermeneutics
Literary genres
New Testament
Reconciliation
Religious literature
Rhetoric
Rhetorical dialogue
Rhetorical questions
Subjunctive mood
Theology
Verbs
title The Argument of Romans 5: Can a Rhetorical Question Make a Difference?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A31%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Argument%20of%20Romans%205:%20Can%20a%20Rhetorical%20Question%20Make%20a%20Difference?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Biblical%20literature&rft.au=Porter,%20Stanley%20E.&rft.date=1991-12-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=655&rft.epage=677&rft.pages=655-677&rft.issn=0021-9231&rft.eissn=1934-3876&rft.coden=JBILAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3267664&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3267664%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1266-bc5b8f61ae95d6912c138841ed5482e7c965ab5118fc54e851dd74802131d293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214618396&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3267664&rfr_iscdi=true