Strategic Protection Factors: Insights into Balancing Knowledge Development and Protection

This paper reports on empirical results concerning one of the first frameworks for examining the similarities and differences of knowledge management (KM) and competitive intelligence (CI). The data lend credence to the theory behind the framework, which balances the risks of not reaching knowledge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Competition forum 2007-01, Vol.5 (1), p.236
Main Authors: Erickson, G Scott, Rothberg, Helen N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Book value
Competition
Competitive advantage
Competitive intelligence
Differences
Intangible assets
Intellectual capital
Knowledge management
Protection
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 236
container_title Competition forum
container_volume 5
creator Erickson, G Scott
Rothberg, Helen N
description This paper reports on empirical results concerning one of the first frameworks for examining the similarities and differences of knowledge management (KM) and competitive intelligence (CI). The data lend credence to the theory behind the framework, which balances the risks of not reaching knowledge development potential with the risks of making knowledge vulnerable to competitive intelligence, while adding new insights. There are clearly differences in industries and firms in terms of the importance of knowledge, how it should be developed, and how it should be protected. By better understanding those differences, we can all benefit by better managing organizational knowledge. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_214845578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1390635651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2148455783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLsKwjAUQDMoWB__ENwLrSa2OPooiougk0sJ6TWm1Jua3Orv6-Dg6HSGczg9FqVSyHgm83TAhiHUSSIXQmYRu5zIKwJjNT96R6DJOuSF0uR8WPI9BmtuFLhFcnylGoXaouEHdK8GKgN8A09oXHsHJK6w-rmMWf-qmgCTL0dsWmzP613cevfoIFBZu87jR5WzVORCyiyf_xW9AXngQj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214845578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strategic Protection Factors: Insights into Balancing Knowledge Development and Protection</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Erickson, G Scott ; Rothberg, Helen N</creator><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G Scott ; Rothberg, Helen N</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports on empirical results concerning one of the first frameworks for examining the similarities and differences of knowledge management (KM) and competitive intelligence (CI). The data lend credence to the theory behind the framework, which balances the risks of not reaching knowledge development potential with the risks of making knowledge vulnerable to competitive intelligence, while adding new insights. There are clearly differences in industries and firms in terms of the importance of knowledge, how it should be developed, and how it should be protected. By better understanding those differences, we can all benefit by better managing organizational knowledge. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1545-2581</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Indiana: American Society for Competitiveness</publisher><subject>Book value ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Competitive intelligence ; Differences ; Intangible assets ; Intellectual capital ; Knowledge management ; Protection ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Competition forum, 2007-01, Vol.5 (1), p.236</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society for Competitiveness 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214845578/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/214845578?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,11669,36041,44344,74644</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Helen N</creatorcontrib><title>Strategic Protection Factors: Insights into Balancing Knowledge Development and Protection</title><title>Competition forum</title><description>This paper reports on empirical results concerning one of the first frameworks for examining the similarities and differences of knowledge management (KM) and competitive intelligence (CI). The data lend credence to the theory behind the framework, which balances the risks of not reaching knowledge development potential with the risks of making knowledge vulnerable to competitive intelligence, while adding new insights. There are clearly differences in industries and firms in terms of the importance of knowledge, how it should be developed, and how it should be protected. By better understanding those differences, we can all benefit by better managing organizational knowledge. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Book value</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Competitive intelligence</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Intangible assets</subject><subject>Intellectual capital</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1545-2581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLsKwjAUQDMoWB__ENwLrSa2OPooiougk0sJ6TWm1Jua3Orv6-Dg6HSGczg9FqVSyHgm83TAhiHUSSIXQmYRu5zIKwJjNT96R6DJOuSF0uR8WPI9BmtuFLhFcnylGoXaouEHdK8GKgN8A09oXHsHJK6w-rmMWf-qmgCTL0dsWmzP613cevfoIFBZu87jR5WzVORCyiyf_xW9AXngQj8</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Erickson, G Scott</creator><creator>Rothberg, Helen N</creator><general>American Society for Competitiveness</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Strategic Protection Factors: Insights into Balancing Knowledge Development and Protection</title><author>Erickson, G Scott ; Rothberg, Helen N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2148455783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Book value</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Competitive intelligence</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Intangible assets</topic><topic>Intellectual capital</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erickson, G Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothberg, Helen N</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Competition forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erickson, G Scott</au><au>Rothberg, Helen N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strategic Protection Factors: Insights into Balancing Knowledge Development and Protection</atitle><jtitle>Competition forum</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>236</spage><pages>236-</pages><issn>1545-2581</issn><abstract>This paper reports on empirical results concerning one of the first frameworks for examining the similarities and differences of knowledge management (KM) and competitive intelligence (CI). The data lend credence to the theory behind the framework, which balances the risks of not reaching knowledge development potential with the risks of making knowledge vulnerable to competitive intelligence, while adding new insights. There are clearly differences in industries and firms in terms of the importance of knowledge, how it should be developed, and how it should be protected. By better understanding those differences, we can all benefit by better managing organizational knowledge. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Indiana</cop><pub>American Society for Competitiveness</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1545-2581
ispartof Competition forum, 2007-01, Vol.5 (1), p.236
issn 1545-2581
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_214845578
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Book value
Competition
Competitive advantage
Competitive intelligence
Differences
Intangible assets
Intellectual capital
Knowledge management
Protection
Studies
title Strategic Protection Factors: Insights into Balancing Knowledge Development and Protection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strategic%20Protection%20Factors:%20Insights%20into%20Balancing%20Knowledge%20Development%20and%20Protection&rft.jtitle=Competition%20forum&rft.au=Erickson,%20G%20Scott&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=236&rft.pages=236-&rft.issn=1545-2581&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1390635651%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2148455783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214845578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true