Comprehension and rate during silent reading: Why do some students do poorly?

This exploratory study was designed to evaluate the interplay of students’ rate and comprehension in independent silent reading of accessible text, within the frameworks of the Simple View of Reading and the RAND Reading Study Group. In the first phase, 61 sixth graders were given a reading test (GR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reading & writing 2019-09, Vol.32 (7), p.1795-1818
Main Authors: Hiebert, Elfrieda H., Daniel, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Comparative Analysis
Correlation
Education
Fluency
Grade 6
Language and Literature
Linguistics
Literacy
Middle school students
Neurology
Oral reading
Psycholinguistics
Reading Ability
Reading Comprehension
Reading Fluency
Reading Motivation
Reading Rate
Reading Tests
Scores
Silent reading
Social Sciences
Student Attitudes
Sustained Silent Reading
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This exploratory study was designed to evaluate the interplay of students’ rate and comprehension in independent silent reading of accessible text, within the frameworks of the Simple View of Reading and the RAND Reading Study Group. In the first phase, 61 sixth graders were given a reading test (GRADE), a motivation questionnaire, and an on-screen measure of comprehension-based silent reading rate (SRF-O, adapted from aimswebPlus SRF) with on-grade and below-grade text. Two-thirds of students had perfect or near-perfect SRF-O comprehension, but the other one-third had moderate to poor comprehension. These weaker SRF-O comprehenders had relatively low GRADE scores, but others with comparable GRADE scores comprehended well on SRF-O. The poorest SRF-O comprehenders read with increasing rate and decreasing comprehension across the SRF-O texts. In the second phase, the 21 students with weaker SRF-O comprehension took an oral reading fluency (ORF) test and a paper form of the silent reading rate measure (SRF-P) in a one-on-one setting. All students comprehended well on SRF-P and their SRF-P rates correlated highly with GRADE and ORF. Results support the view that poor comprehension in independent silent reading of accessible text may be due to factors other than reading ability (such as assessment context) and that, when students read with comprehension, their rate is a good indicator of their reading ability.
ISSN:0922-4777
1573-0905
DOI:10.1007/s11145-018-9917-7