" HISTORY BELONGS TO THE WINNERS": THE BAZELON-LEVENTHAL DEBATE AND THE CONTINUING RELEVANCE OF THE PROCESS/SUBSTANCE DICHOTOMY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION

Krotoszynski argues that the basic objection that federal Judge David Bazelon raised to the concept of hard look review in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. Natural Resources Defense Council retains continuing validity. He asserts that a greater overt emphasis on process values might improve the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Administrative law review 2006-10, Vol.58 (4), p.995-1015
Main Author: Krotoszynski, Ronald J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Administrative agencies
Administrative courts
Administrative law
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DISCUSSION FORUM
Administrative law judges
Decision making
Environmental agencies
Federal court decisions
Government agencies
Judges
Judicial review
Judicial reviews
Legal proceedings
Moral agency
Theory
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Krotoszynski argues that the basic objection that federal Judge David Bazelon raised to the concept of hard look review in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. Natural Resources Defense Council retains continuing validity. He asserts that a greater overt emphasis on process values might improve the quality of administrative decision making.
ISSN:0001-8368
2326-9154