What does it mean to feel loved: Cultural consensus and individual differences in felt love

Cultural consensus theory is a statistical framework (CCT) for the study of individual differences in the knowledge of culturally shared opinions. In this article, we demonstrate how a CCT analysis can be used to study individual differences and cultural consensus on what makes people feel loved, or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2019-01, Vol.36 (1), p.214-243
Main Authors: Heshmati, Saeideh, Oravecz, Zita, Pressman, Sarah, Batchelder, William H., Muth, Chelsea, Vandekerckhove, Joachim
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bias
Cognition
Cognitive-behavioral factors
Cultural differences
Culture
Emotions
Individual differences
Knowledge
Love
Personal relationships
Personality
Social behavior
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cultural consensus theory is a statistical framework (CCT) for the study of individual differences in the knowledge of culturally shared opinions. In this article, we demonstrate how a CCT analysis can be used to study individual differences and cultural consensus on what makes people feel loved, or more generally any social behaviors that are governed by cognitive schemata. To highlight the advantages of the method, we describe a study in which people reported on their everyday experiences of feeling loved. Our unique approach to understanding this topic is to focus on people’s cognitive evaluations on what feeling loved (both romantically and nonromantically) entails by exploring the shared agreement regarding when one is most likely to feel loved and the individual differences that influence knowledge of these shared agreements. Our results reveal that people converge on a consensus about indicators of expressed love and that these scenarios are both romantic and nonromantic. Moreover, people show individual differences in (1) the amount of knowledge they have about this consensus and (2) their guessing biases in responding to items on love scenarios, depending on personality and demographics—all conclusions made possible by the CCT method.
ISSN:0265-4075
1460-3608
DOI:10.1177/0265407517724600