Loading…

A General Methodology for Climate‐Informed Approaches to Long‐Term Flood Projection—Illustrated With the Ohio River Basin

Estimating future hydrologic floods under nonstationary climate is a key challenge for flood management. Climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection are an appealing alternative to traditional modeling chains. This work formalizes climate‐informed approaches into a general methodology...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water resources research 2018-11, Vol.54 (11), p.9321-9341
Main Authors: Schlef, Katherine E., François, Baptiste, Robertson, Andrew W., Brown, Casey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823
container_end_page 9341
container_issue 11
container_start_page 9321
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 54
creator Schlef, Katherine E.
François, Baptiste
Robertson, Andrew W.
Brown, Casey
description Estimating future hydrologic floods under nonstationary climate is a key challenge for flood management. Climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection are an appealing alternative to traditional modeling chains. This work formalizes climate‐informed approaches into a general methodology consisting of four steps: (1) selection of predictand representing extreme events, (2) identification of credible large‐scale predictors that mechanistically control the occurrence and magnitude of the predictand, (3) development of a statistical model relating the predictors to the predictand, and (4) projection of the predictand by forcing the model with predictor projections. These four steps, developed from a review of the current literature, are demonstrated for multiple gages in the northwest Ohio River Basin in the United States Midwest as a case study. Floods are defined as annual maximum series events in January through April and are linked to geopotential height and soil moisture predictors in a Bayesian linear regression model. The projections generally show a slight decrease in future flood magnitude and demonstrate the transparency of the climate‐informed approach. An initial step for more general application across the United States and remaining challenges associated with climate‐informed flood projection are discussed. Key Points A formal four step methodology is proposed for climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection The methodology is applied to the Ohio River Basin as a case study, and projected change is attributed to specific predictands An initial step to general applicability across the United States and remaining challenges are discussed
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2018WR023209
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2157700478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2157700478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFZ3PsCAW6Pzk2Qyy1psLVSUUOkyTJKbJiXN1Jmp0pV9BBc-YZ_Ekbpw5epyuYfv8h2ELim5oYTJW0ZoMk8J44zII9SjMgwDIQU_Rj1CQh5QLsUpOrN2SQgNo1j00McAj6EDo1r8CK7WpW71YosrbfCwbVbKwX73Oen8voISD9Zro1VRg8VO46nuFv46A7PCo1brEj8bvYTCNbrb774mbbuxzviIEs8bV2NXA36qG43T5g0MvlO26c7RSaVaCxe_s49eRvez4UMwfRpPhoNpoFjCeRBXrOC5jCSFMqSMqJIyKHORFypMlMjDoih4STjngknOZOTbhUAViXMAnjDeR1eHXF_gdQPWZUu9MZ1_mTEaCeH9iMRT1weqMNpaA1W2Nl6C2WaUZD-Ks7-KPc4P-HvTwvZfNpunw5Tx2Jf5BtCYgKI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157700478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A General Methodology for Climate‐Informed Approaches to Long‐Term Flood Projection—Illustrated With the Ohio River Basin</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Schlef, Katherine E. ; François, Baptiste ; Robertson, Andrew W. ; Brown, Casey</creator><creatorcontrib>Schlef, Katherine E. ; François, Baptiste ; Robertson, Andrew W. ; Brown, Casey</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating future hydrologic floods under nonstationary climate is a key challenge for flood management. Climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection are an appealing alternative to traditional modeling chains. This work formalizes climate‐informed approaches into a general methodology consisting of four steps: (1) selection of predictand representing extreme events, (2) identification of credible large‐scale predictors that mechanistically control the occurrence and magnitude of the predictand, (3) development of a statistical model relating the predictors to the predictand, and (4) projection of the predictand by forcing the model with predictor projections. These four steps, developed from a review of the current literature, are demonstrated for multiple gages in the northwest Ohio River Basin in the United States Midwest as a case study. Floods are defined as annual maximum series events in January through April and are linked to geopotential height and soil moisture predictors in a Bayesian linear regression model. The projections generally show a slight decrease in future flood magnitude and demonstrate the transparency of the climate‐informed approach. An initial step for more general application across the United States and remaining challenges associated with climate‐informed flood projection are discussed. Key Points A formal four step methodology is proposed for climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection The methodology is applied to the Ohio River Basin as a case study, and projected change is attributed to specific predictands An initial step to general applicability across the United States and remaining challenges are discussed</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2018WR023209</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Case studies ; Climate ; climate change ; Climate models ; climate‐informed ; Dynamic height ; flood ; Flood control ; Flood magnitude ; Flood management ; Floods ; Geopotential ; Geopotential height ; Hydrology ; Literature reviews ; Mathematical models ; Methods ; Modelling ; nonstationary ; Ohio River Basin ; Probability theory ; Projection ; Regression models ; River basins ; Rivers ; Soil ; Soil moisture ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical models ; Transparency (optical)</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2018-11, Vol.54 (11), p.9321-9341</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0625-4357 ; 0000-0001-7585-5589 ; 0000-0002-8248-041X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2018WR023209$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2018WR023209$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11514,27924,27925,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schlef, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Casey</creatorcontrib><title>A General Methodology for Climate‐Informed Approaches to Long‐Term Flood Projection—Illustrated With the Ohio River Basin</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Estimating future hydrologic floods under nonstationary climate is a key challenge for flood management. Climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection are an appealing alternative to traditional modeling chains. This work formalizes climate‐informed approaches into a general methodology consisting of four steps: (1) selection of predictand representing extreme events, (2) identification of credible large‐scale predictors that mechanistically control the occurrence and magnitude of the predictand, (3) development of a statistical model relating the predictors to the predictand, and (4) projection of the predictand by forcing the model with predictor projections. These four steps, developed from a review of the current literature, are demonstrated for multiple gages in the northwest Ohio River Basin in the United States Midwest as a case study. Floods are defined as annual maximum series events in January through April and are linked to geopotential height and soil moisture predictors in a Bayesian linear regression model. The projections generally show a slight decrease in future flood magnitude and demonstrate the transparency of the climate‐informed approach. An initial step for more general application across the United States and remaining challenges associated with climate‐informed flood projection are discussed. Key Points A formal four step methodology is proposed for climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection The methodology is applied to the Ohio River Basin as a case study, and projected change is attributed to specific predictands An initial step to general applicability across the United States and remaining challenges are discussed</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>climate‐informed</subject><subject>Dynamic height</subject><subject>flood</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Flood magnitude</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Geopotential</subject><subject>Geopotential height</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>nonstationary</subject><subject>Ohio River Basin</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil moisture</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Transparency (optical)</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AURgdRsFZ3PsCAW6Pzk2Qyy1psLVSUUOkyTJKbJiXN1Jmp0pV9BBc-YZ_Ekbpw5epyuYfv8h2ELim5oYTJW0ZoMk8J44zII9SjMgwDIQU_Rj1CQh5QLsUpOrN2SQgNo1j00McAj6EDo1r8CK7WpW71YosrbfCwbVbKwX73Oen8voISD9Zro1VRg8VO46nuFv46A7PCo1brEj8bvYTCNbrb774mbbuxzviIEs8bV2NXA36qG43T5g0MvlO26c7RSaVaCxe_s49eRvez4UMwfRpPhoNpoFjCeRBXrOC5jCSFMqSMqJIyKHORFypMlMjDoih4STjngknOZOTbhUAViXMAnjDeR1eHXF_gdQPWZUu9MZ1_mTEaCeH9iMRT1weqMNpaA1W2Nl6C2WaUZD-Ks7-KPc4P-HvTwvZfNpunw5Tx2Jf5BtCYgKI</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Schlef, Katherine E.</creator><creator>François, Baptiste</creator><creator>Robertson, Andrew W.</creator><creator>Brown, Casey</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-4357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-5589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-041X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>A General Methodology for Climate‐Informed Approaches to Long‐Term Flood Projection—Illustrated With the Ohio River Basin</title><author>Schlef, Katherine E. ; François, Baptiste ; Robertson, Andrew W. ; Brown, Casey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>climate‐informed</topic><topic>Dynamic height</topic><topic>flood</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Flood magnitude</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Geopotential</topic><topic>Geopotential height</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>nonstationary</topic><topic>Ohio River Basin</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil moisture</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Transparency (optical)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schlef, Katherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>François, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Andrew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Casey</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schlef, Katherine E.</au><au>François, Baptiste</au><au>Robertson, Andrew W.</au><au>Brown, Casey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A General Methodology for Climate‐Informed Approaches to Long‐Term Flood Projection—Illustrated With the Ohio River Basin</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>9321</spage><epage>9341</epage><pages>9321-9341</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Estimating future hydrologic floods under nonstationary climate is a key challenge for flood management. Climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection are an appealing alternative to traditional modeling chains. This work formalizes climate‐informed approaches into a general methodology consisting of four steps: (1) selection of predictand representing extreme events, (2) identification of credible large‐scale predictors that mechanistically control the occurrence and magnitude of the predictand, (3) development of a statistical model relating the predictors to the predictand, and (4) projection of the predictand by forcing the model with predictor projections. These four steps, developed from a review of the current literature, are demonstrated for multiple gages in the northwest Ohio River Basin in the United States Midwest as a case study. Floods are defined as annual maximum series events in January through April and are linked to geopotential height and soil moisture predictors in a Bayesian linear regression model. The projections generally show a slight decrease in future flood magnitude and demonstrate the transparency of the climate‐informed approach. An initial step for more general application across the United States and remaining challenges associated with climate‐informed flood projection are discussed. Key Points A formal four step methodology is proposed for climate‐informed approaches to long‐term flood projection The methodology is applied to the Ohio River Basin as a case study, and projected change is attributed to specific predictands An initial step to general applicability across the United States and remaining challenges are discussed</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2018WR023209</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-4357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-5589</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-041X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2018-11, Vol.54 (11), p.9321-9341
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2157700478
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Bayesian analysis
Case studies
Climate
climate change
Climate models
climate‐informed
Dynamic height
flood
Flood control
Flood magnitude
Flood management
Floods
Geopotential
Geopotential height
Hydrology
Literature reviews
Mathematical models
Methods
Modelling
nonstationary
Ohio River Basin
Probability theory
Projection
Regression models
River basins
Rivers
Soil
Soil moisture
Statistical analysis
Statistical models
Transparency (optical)
title A General Methodology for Climate‐Informed Approaches to Long‐Term Flood Projection—Illustrated With the Ohio River Basin
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20General%20Methodology%20for%20Climate%E2%80%90Informed%20Approaches%20to%20Long%E2%80%90Term%20Flood%20Projection%E2%80%94Illustrated%20With%20the%20Ohio%20River%20Basin&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Schlef,%20Katherine%20E.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=9321&rft.epage=9341&rft.pages=9321-9341&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2018WR023209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157700478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2833-6f2c3b9591ed4120ad12edb7bca48a7b4ccc3d033372932954564e1a06bee3823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157700478&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true