Factors Influencing Nesting Ecology of Lesser Prairie-Chickens

• Published in: The Journal of wildlife management 2019-01, Vol.83 (1), p.205-215
• Main Authors: LAUTENBACH, JOSEPH M., HAUKOS, DAVID A., SULLINS, DANIEL S., HAGEN, CHRISTIAN A., LAUTENBACH, JONATHAN D., PITMAN, JAMES C., PLUMB, REID T., ROBINSON, SAMANTHA G., KRAFT, JOHN D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Breeding seasons; Chickens; Composition; Conservation; Drought; Ecological effects; Global positioning systems; GPS; Grasslands; Habitat Relations; habitat selection; Heterogeneity; Kansas; lesser prairie‐chicken; Livestock breeding; nest survival; Nesting; Nests; nest‐site selection; Populations; Poultry; Site selection; Survival; Transmitters; Tympanuchus pallidicinctus; Vegetation; Wildlife; Wildlife habitats; Wildlife management
• ISSN: 0022-541X; 1937-2817
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21582

Lesser prairie-chicken (Tympanuchus pallidicinctus) populations have declined since the 1980s. Understanding factors influencing nest-site selection and nest survival are important for conservation and management of lesser prairie-chicken populations. However, >75% of the extant population is in the northern extent of the range where data on breeding season ecology are lacking. We tested factors influencing fine-scale and regional nest-site selection and nest survival across the northern portion of the lesser prairie-chicken range. We trapped and affixed satellite global positioning system and very high frequency transmitters to female lesser prairie-chickens (n = 307) in south-central and western Kansas and eastern Colorado, USA. We located and monitored 257 lesser prairie-chicken nests from 2013 to 2016. We evaluated nest-site selection and nest survival in comparison to vegetation composition and structure. Overall, nest-site selection in relation to vegetation characteristics was similar across our study area. Lesser prairie-chickens selected nest microsites with 75% visual obstruction 2.0–3.5 dm tall and 95.7% of all nests were in habitat with ≥1 dm and ≤4 dm visual obstruction. Nests were located in areas with 6–8% bare ground, on average, avoiding areas with greater percent cover of bare ground. The type of vegetation present was less important than cover of adequate height. Nest survival was maximized when 75% visual obstruction was 2.0–4.0 dm. Nest survival did not vary spatially or among years and generally increased as intensity of drought decreased throughout the study although not significantly. To provide nesting cover considering yearly variation in drought conditions, it is important to maintain residual cover by managing for structural heterogeneity of vegetation. Managing for structural heterogeneity could be accomplished by maintaining or strategically applying practices of the Conservation Reserve Program, using appropriate fire and grazing disturbances in native working grasslands, and establishing site-specific monitoring of vegetation composition and structure.