Loading…
Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)
I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of r...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of botany 1996-10, Vol.83 (10), p.1329-1336 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3 |
container_end_page | 1336 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1329 |
container_title | American journal of botany |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.) |
description | I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215881469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2446118</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2446118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1u1DAUhS0EEkPhDUCyugKJBNtJ_MNuOqIFVIkFVCytG8cujjLxYDtq-_Z4mmr2rK6vzznflQ5C55TUlBD2aaxp14iKUSVqqhSvc08bRWV9_wxtTtJztCHFXSnK2Ev0KqWxrKpVbIPCBWQM84D_LPu9n297Hwd8CNPkZ8g-zDi4ImNYcsg2RzhMwQ_YhGnZzxCxAZOX9BH_tr2NPSw2BmOjXRK-O_14_H5XbGAs2A-v0QsHU7JvnuYZurn88mv3tbr-cfVtt72uDGu4rGRHDBsMSCeMY1Y1DTeiHwSXVoh2ULwRQBWRnArroDeys04RZXhX7CBcc4bOV-4hhr-LTVmPYYlzOakZ7aSkLVfF9Hk1mRhSitbpQ_R7iA-aEn3sV4_6WKI-lqiP_eqnfvV9CW_X8J2f7MN_JPX2-wV7fBfG25UxphziicHaltNH-d0qOwgabqNP-uZngQnS8Y7x5h-vSpeL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215881469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creator><creatorcontrib>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creatorcontrib><description>I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: American Botanical Society</publisher><subject>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA ; ANATOMIE VEGETALE ; Andean habitats ; AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD ; AUTOCOMPATIBILITE ; Bats ; BEHAVIOUR ; Botany ; BOURGEON ; BUDS ; CACTACEAE ; Cactus ; CHIROPTERA ; COLIBRI ; COLOR ; COLOUR ; COMPORTAMIENTO ; COMPORTEMENT ; COROLA ; COROLLA ; COROLLE ; COULEUR ; DIMENSION ; DIMENSIONS ; DIURNAL ACTIVITY ; FLEUR ; FLORES ; FLOWERS ; Flowers & plants ; Fruit set ; FRUITS ; FRUTAS ; GENE ; GENE FREQUENCY ; GENES ; GENETIC DIVERSITY ; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM ; GENETIC VARIATION ; Genetics ; GINECEO ; GYNECEE ; GYNOECIUM ; HUMMINGBIRDS ; Insect pollination ; INSECTA ; LARGURA ; LARVAE ; LARVAS ; LARVE ; LENGTH ; LLUVIA ; LONGUEUR ; NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY ; OISEAU MOUCHE ; PERIODICIDAD ; PERIODICITE ; PERIODICITY ; PEROU ; PERU ; PLANT ANATOMY ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; PLUIE ; POLIMORFISMO GENETICO ; POLINIZACION ; POLINIZADORES ; Pollen ; Pollinating insects ; POLLINATION ; POLLINATORS ; POLLINISATEUR ; POLLINISATION ; POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE ; polyploidy ; RAIN ; Reproductive Biology ; SELF COMPATIBILITY ; SIZE ; STIGMA ; STYLES ; TETRAPLOIDIA ; TETRAPLOIDIE ; TETRAPLOIDY ; VARIACION GENETICA ; VARIATION GENETIQUE ; Weberbauerocereus ; YEMA (PLANTA)</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 1996-10, Vol.83 (10), p.1329-1336</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Oct 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2446118$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2446118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creatorcontrib><title>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</title><title>American journal of botany</title><description>I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus</description><subject>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA</subject><subject>ANATOMIE VEGETALE</subject><subject>Andean habitats</subject><subject>AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD</subject><subject>AUTOCOMPATIBILITE</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>BEHAVIOUR</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>BOURGEON</subject><subject>BUDS</subject><subject>CACTACEAE</subject><subject>Cactus</subject><subject>CHIROPTERA</subject><subject>COLIBRI</subject><subject>COLOR</subject><subject>COLOUR</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT</subject><subject>COROLA</subject><subject>COROLLA</subject><subject>COROLLE</subject><subject>COULEUR</subject><subject>DIMENSION</subject><subject>DIMENSIONS</subject><subject>DIURNAL ACTIVITY</subject><subject>FLEUR</subject><subject>FLORES</subject><subject>FLOWERS</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Fruit set</subject><subject>FRUITS</subject><subject>FRUTAS</subject><subject>GENE</subject><subject>GENE FREQUENCY</subject><subject>GENES</subject><subject>GENETIC DIVERSITY</subject><subject>GENETIC POLYMORPHISM</subject><subject>GENETIC VARIATION</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>GINECEO</subject><subject>GYNECEE</subject><subject>GYNOECIUM</subject><subject>HUMMINGBIRDS</subject><subject>Insect pollination</subject><subject>INSECTA</subject><subject>LARGURA</subject><subject>LARVAE</subject><subject>LARVAS</subject><subject>LARVE</subject><subject>LENGTH</subject><subject>LLUVIA</subject><subject>LONGUEUR</subject><subject>NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY</subject><subject>OISEAU MOUCHE</subject><subject>PERIODICIDAD</subject><subject>PERIODICITE</subject><subject>PERIODICITY</subject><subject>PEROU</subject><subject>PERU</subject><subject>PLANT ANATOMY</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>PLUIE</subject><subject>POLIMORFISMO GENETICO</subject><subject>POLINIZACION</subject><subject>POLINIZADORES</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollinating insects</subject><subject>POLLINATION</subject><subject>POLLINATORS</subject><subject>POLLINISATEUR</subject><subject>POLLINISATION</subject><subject>POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE</subject><subject>polyploidy</subject><subject>RAIN</subject><subject>Reproductive Biology</subject><subject>SELF COMPATIBILITY</subject><subject>SIZE</subject><subject>STIGMA</subject><subject>STYLES</subject><subject>TETRAPLOIDIA</subject><subject>TETRAPLOIDIE</subject><subject>TETRAPLOIDY</subject><subject>VARIACION GENETICA</subject><subject>VARIATION GENETIQUE</subject><subject>Weberbauerocereus</subject><subject>YEMA (PLANTA)</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkM1u1DAUhS0EEkPhDUCyugKJBNtJ_MNuOqIFVIkFVCytG8cujjLxYDtq-_Z4mmr2rK6vzznflQ5C55TUlBD2aaxp14iKUSVqqhSvc08bRWV9_wxtTtJztCHFXSnK2Ev0KqWxrKpVbIPCBWQM84D_LPu9n297Hwd8CNPkZ8g-zDi4ImNYcsg2RzhMwQ_YhGnZzxCxAZOX9BH_tr2NPSw2BmOjXRK-O_14_H5XbGAs2A-v0QsHU7JvnuYZurn88mv3tbr-cfVtt72uDGu4rGRHDBsMSCeMY1Y1DTeiHwSXVoh2ULwRQBWRnArroDeys04RZXhX7CBcc4bOV-4hhr-LTVmPYYlzOakZ7aSkLVfF9Hk1mRhSitbpQ_R7iA-aEn3sV4_6WKI-lqiP_eqnfvV9CW_X8J2f7MN_JPX2-wV7fBfG25UxphziicHaltNH-d0qOwgabqNP-uZngQnS8Y7x5h-vSpeL</recordid><startdate>199610</startdate><enddate>199610</enddate><creator>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creator><general>American Botanical Society</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199610</creationdate><title>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</title><author>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA</topic><topic>ANATOMIE VEGETALE</topic><topic>Andean habitats</topic><topic>AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD</topic><topic>AUTOCOMPATIBILITE</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>BEHAVIOUR</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>BOURGEON</topic><topic>BUDS</topic><topic>CACTACEAE</topic><topic>Cactus</topic><topic>CHIROPTERA</topic><topic>COLIBRI</topic><topic>COLOR</topic><topic>COLOUR</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT</topic><topic>COROLA</topic><topic>COROLLA</topic><topic>COROLLE</topic><topic>COULEUR</topic><topic>DIMENSION</topic><topic>DIMENSIONS</topic><topic>DIURNAL ACTIVITY</topic><topic>FLEUR</topic><topic>FLORES</topic><topic>FLOWERS</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Fruit set</topic><topic>FRUITS</topic><topic>FRUTAS</topic><topic>GENE</topic><topic>GENE FREQUENCY</topic><topic>GENES</topic><topic>GENETIC DIVERSITY</topic><topic>GENETIC POLYMORPHISM</topic><topic>GENETIC VARIATION</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>GINECEO</topic><topic>GYNECEE</topic><topic>GYNOECIUM</topic><topic>HUMMINGBIRDS</topic><topic>Insect pollination</topic><topic>INSECTA</topic><topic>LARGURA</topic><topic>LARVAE</topic><topic>LARVAS</topic><topic>LARVE</topic><topic>LENGTH</topic><topic>LLUVIA</topic><topic>LONGUEUR</topic><topic>NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY</topic><topic>OISEAU MOUCHE</topic><topic>PERIODICIDAD</topic><topic>PERIODICITE</topic><topic>PERIODICITY</topic><topic>PEROU</topic><topic>PERU</topic><topic>PLANT ANATOMY</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>PLUIE</topic><topic>POLIMORFISMO GENETICO</topic><topic>POLINIZACION</topic><topic>POLINIZADORES</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollinating insects</topic><topic>POLLINATION</topic><topic>POLLINATORS</topic><topic>POLLINISATEUR</topic><topic>POLLINISATION</topic><topic>POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE</topic><topic>polyploidy</topic><topic>RAIN</topic><topic>Reproductive Biology</topic><topic>SELF COMPATIBILITY</topic><topic>SIZE</topic><topic>STIGMA</topic><topic>STYLES</topic><topic>TETRAPLOIDIA</topic><topic>TETRAPLOIDIE</topic><topic>TETRAPLOIDY</topic><topic>VARIACION GENETICA</topic><topic>VARIATION GENETIQUE</topic><topic>Weberbauerocereus</topic><topic>YEMA (PLANTA)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><date>1996-10</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1329</spage><epage>1336</epage><pages>1329-1336</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>American Botanical Society</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9122 |
ispartof | American journal of botany, 1996-10, Vol.83 (10), p.1329-1336 |
issn | 0002-9122 1537-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_215881469 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
subjects | ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA ANATOMIE VEGETALE Andean habitats AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD AUTOCOMPATIBILITE Bats BEHAVIOUR Botany BOURGEON BUDS CACTACEAE Cactus CHIROPTERA COLIBRI COLOR COLOUR COMPORTAMIENTO COMPORTEMENT COROLA COROLLA COROLLE COULEUR DIMENSION DIMENSIONS DIURNAL ACTIVITY FLEUR FLORES FLOWERS Flowers & plants Fruit set FRUITS FRUTAS GENE GENE FREQUENCY GENES GENETIC DIVERSITY GENETIC POLYMORPHISM GENETIC VARIATION Genetics GINECEO GYNECEE GYNOECIUM HUMMINGBIRDS Insect pollination INSECTA LARGURA LARVAE LARVAS LARVE LENGTH LLUVIA LONGUEUR NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY OISEAU MOUCHE PERIODICIDAD PERIODICITE PERIODICITY PEROU PERU PLANT ANATOMY Plant reproduction Plants PLUIE POLIMORFISMO GENETICO POLINIZACION POLINIZADORES Pollen Pollinating insects POLLINATION POLLINATORS POLLINISATEUR POLLINISATION POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE polyploidy RAIN Reproductive Biology SELF COMPATIBILITY SIZE STIGMA STYLES TETRAPLOIDIA TETRAPLOIDIE TETRAPLOIDY VARIACION GENETICA VARIATION GENETIQUE Weberbauerocereus YEMA (PLANTA) |
title | Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bat%20and%20hummingbird%20pollination%20of%20an%20autotetraploid%20columnar%20cactus,%20Weberbauerocereus%20weberbaueri%20(Cactaceae)&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Sahley,%20C.T.%20(CONATURA,%20Arequipa,%20Peru.)&rft.date=1996-10&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1329&rft.epage=1336&rft.pages=1329-1336&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2446118%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215881469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2446118&rfr_iscdi=true |