Loading…

Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)

I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of botany 1996-10, Vol.83 (10), p.1329-1336
Main Author: Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3
container_end_page 1336
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1329
container_title American journal of botany
container_volume 83
creator Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)
description I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus
doi_str_mv 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_215881469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2446118</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2446118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM1u1DAUhS0EEkPhDUCyugKJBNtJ_MNuOqIFVIkFVCytG8cujjLxYDtq-_Z4mmr2rK6vzznflQ5C55TUlBD2aaxp14iKUSVqqhSvc08bRWV9_wxtTtJztCHFXSnK2Ev0KqWxrKpVbIPCBWQM84D_LPu9n297Hwd8CNPkZ8g-zDi4ImNYcsg2RzhMwQ_YhGnZzxCxAZOX9BH_tr2NPSw2BmOjXRK-O_14_H5XbGAs2A-v0QsHU7JvnuYZurn88mv3tbr-cfVtt72uDGu4rGRHDBsMSCeMY1Y1DTeiHwSXVoh2ULwRQBWRnArroDeys04RZXhX7CBcc4bOV-4hhr-LTVmPYYlzOakZ7aSkLVfF9Hk1mRhSitbpQ_R7iA-aEn3sV4_6WKI-lqiP_eqnfvV9CW_X8J2f7MN_JPX2-wV7fBfG25UxphziicHaltNH-d0qOwgabqNP-uZngQnS8Y7x5h-vSpeL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215881469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creator><creatorcontrib>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creatorcontrib><description>I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9122</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJBOAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: American Botanical Society</publisher><subject>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA ; ANATOMIE VEGETALE ; Andean habitats ; AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD ; AUTOCOMPATIBILITE ; Bats ; BEHAVIOUR ; Botany ; BOURGEON ; BUDS ; CACTACEAE ; Cactus ; CHIROPTERA ; COLIBRI ; COLOR ; COLOUR ; COMPORTAMIENTO ; COMPORTEMENT ; COROLA ; COROLLA ; COROLLE ; COULEUR ; DIMENSION ; DIMENSIONS ; DIURNAL ACTIVITY ; FLEUR ; FLORES ; FLOWERS ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Fruit set ; FRUITS ; FRUTAS ; GENE ; GENE FREQUENCY ; GENES ; GENETIC DIVERSITY ; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM ; GENETIC VARIATION ; Genetics ; GINECEO ; GYNECEE ; GYNOECIUM ; HUMMINGBIRDS ; Insect pollination ; INSECTA ; LARGURA ; LARVAE ; LARVAS ; LARVE ; LENGTH ; LLUVIA ; LONGUEUR ; NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY ; OISEAU MOUCHE ; PERIODICIDAD ; PERIODICITE ; PERIODICITY ; PEROU ; PERU ; PLANT ANATOMY ; Plant reproduction ; Plants ; PLUIE ; POLIMORFISMO GENETICO ; POLINIZACION ; POLINIZADORES ; Pollen ; Pollinating insects ; POLLINATION ; POLLINATORS ; POLLINISATEUR ; POLLINISATION ; POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE ; polyploidy ; RAIN ; Reproductive Biology ; SELF COMPATIBILITY ; SIZE ; STIGMA ; STYLES ; TETRAPLOIDIA ; TETRAPLOIDIE ; TETRAPLOIDY ; VARIACION GENETICA ; VARIATION GENETIQUE ; Weberbauerocereus ; YEMA (PLANTA)</subject><ispartof>American journal of botany, 1996-10, Vol.83 (10), p.1329-1336</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 Botanical Society of America, Inc.</rights><rights>1996 Botanical Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Botanical Society of America, Inc. Oct 1996</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2446118$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2446118$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creatorcontrib><title>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</title><title>American journal of botany</title><description>I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus</description><subject>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA</subject><subject>ANATOMIE VEGETALE</subject><subject>Andean habitats</subject><subject>AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD</subject><subject>AUTOCOMPATIBILITE</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>BEHAVIOUR</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>BOURGEON</subject><subject>BUDS</subject><subject>CACTACEAE</subject><subject>Cactus</subject><subject>CHIROPTERA</subject><subject>COLIBRI</subject><subject>COLOR</subject><subject>COLOUR</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT</subject><subject>COROLA</subject><subject>COROLLA</subject><subject>COROLLE</subject><subject>COULEUR</subject><subject>DIMENSION</subject><subject>DIMENSIONS</subject><subject>DIURNAL ACTIVITY</subject><subject>FLEUR</subject><subject>FLORES</subject><subject>FLOWERS</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Fruit set</subject><subject>FRUITS</subject><subject>FRUTAS</subject><subject>GENE</subject><subject>GENE FREQUENCY</subject><subject>GENES</subject><subject>GENETIC DIVERSITY</subject><subject>GENETIC POLYMORPHISM</subject><subject>GENETIC VARIATION</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>GINECEO</subject><subject>GYNECEE</subject><subject>GYNOECIUM</subject><subject>HUMMINGBIRDS</subject><subject>Insect pollination</subject><subject>INSECTA</subject><subject>LARGURA</subject><subject>LARVAE</subject><subject>LARVAS</subject><subject>LARVE</subject><subject>LENGTH</subject><subject>LLUVIA</subject><subject>LONGUEUR</subject><subject>NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY</subject><subject>OISEAU MOUCHE</subject><subject>PERIODICIDAD</subject><subject>PERIODICITE</subject><subject>PERIODICITY</subject><subject>PEROU</subject><subject>PERU</subject><subject>PLANT ANATOMY</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>PLUIE</subject><subject>POLIMORFISMO GENETICO</subject><subject>POLINIZACION</subject><subject>POLINIZADORES</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollinating insects</subject><subject>POLLINATION</subject><subject>POLLINATORS</subject><subject>POLLINISATEUR</subject><subject>POLLINISATION</subject><subject>POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE</subject><subject>polyploidy</subject><subject>RAIN</subject><subject>Reproductive Biology</subject><subject>SELF COMPATIBILITY</subject><subject>SIZE</subject><subject>STIGMA</subject><subject>STYLES</subject><subject>TETRAPLOIDIA</subject><subject>TETRAPLOIDIE</subject><subject>TETRAPLOIDY</subject><subject>VARIACION GENETICA</subject><subject>VARIATION GENETIQUE</subject><subject>Weberbauerocereus</subject><subject>YEMA (PLANTA)</subject><issn>0002-9122</issn><issn>1537-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkM1u1DAUhS0EEkPhDUCyugKJBNtJ_MNuOqIFVIkFVCytG8cujjLxYDtq-_Z4mmr2rK6vzznflQ5C55TUlBD2aaxp14iKUSVqqhSvc08bRWV9_wxtTtJztCHFXSnK2Ev0KqWxrKpVbIPCBWQM84D_LPu9n297Hwd8CNPkZ8g-zDi4ImNYcsg2RzhMwQ_YhGnZzxCxAZOX9BH_tr2NPSw2BmOjXRK-O_14_H5XbGAs2A-v0QsHU7JvnuYZurn88mv3tbr-cfVtt72uDGu4rGRHDBsMSCeMY1Y1DTeiHwSXVoh2ULwRQBWRnArroDeys04RZXhX7CBcc4bOV-4hhr-LTVmPYYlzOakZ7aSkLVfF9Hk1mRhSitbpQ_R7iA-aEn3sV4_6WKI-lqiP_eqnfvV9CW_X8J2f7MN_JPX2-wV7fBfG25UxphziicHaltNH-d0qOwgabqNP-uZngQnS8Y7x5h-vSpeL</recordid><startdate>199610</startdate><enddate>199610</enddate><creator>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creator><general>American Botanical Society</general><general>Botanical Society of America, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199610</creationdate><title>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</title><author>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA</topic><topic>ANATOMIE VEGETALE</topic><topic>Andean habitats</topic><topic>AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD</topic><topic>AUTOCOMPATIBILITE</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>BEHAVIOUR</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>BOURGEON</topic><topic>BUDS</topic><topic>CACTACEAE</topic><topic>Cactus</topic><topic>CHIROPTERA</topic><topic>COLIBRI</topic><topic>COLOR</topic><topic>COLOUR</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT</topic><topic>COROLA</topic><topic>COROLLA</topic><topic>COROLLE</topic><topic>COULEUR</topic><topic>DIMENSION</topic><topic>DIMENSIONS</topic><topic>DIURNAL ACTIVITY</topic><topic>FLEUR</topic><topic>FLORES</topic><topic>FLOWERS</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Fruit set</topic><topic>FRUITS</topic><topic>FRUTAS</topic><topic>GENE</topic><topic>GENE FREQUENCY</topic><topic>GENES</topic><topic>GENETIC DIVERSITY</topic><topic>GENETIC POLYMORPHISM</topic><topic>GENETIC VARIATION</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>GINECEO</topic><topic>GYNECEE</topic><topic>GYNOECIUM</topic><topic>HUMMINGBIRDS</topic><topic>Insect pollination</topic><topic>INSECTA</topic><topic>LARGURA</topic><topic>LARVAE</topic><topic>LARVAS</topic><topic>LARVE</topic><topic>LENGTH</topic><topic>LLUVIA</topic><topic>LONGUEUR</topic><topic>NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY</topic><topic>OISEAU MOUCHE</topic><topic>PERIODICIDAD</topic><topic>PERIODICITE</topic><topic>PERIODICITY</topic><topic>PEROU</topic><topic>PERU</topic><topic>PLANT ANATOMY</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>PLUIE</topic><topic>POLIMORFISMO GENETICO</topic><topic>POLINIZACION</topic><topic>POLINIZADORES</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollinating insects</topic><topic>POLLINATION</topic><topic>POLLINATORS</topic><topic>POLLINISATEUR</topic><topic>POLLINISATION</topic><topic>POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE</topic><topic>polyploidy</topic><topic>RAIN</topic><topic>Reproductive Biology</topic><topic>SELF COMPATIBILITY</topic><topic>SIZE</topic><topic>STIGMA</topic><topic>STYLES</topic><topic>TETRAPLOIDIA</topic><topic>TETRAPLOIDIE</topic><topic>TETRAPLOIDY</topic><topic>VARIACION GENETICA</topic><topic>VARIATION GENETIQUE</topic><topic>Weberbauerocereus</topic><topic>YEMA (PLANTA)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sahley, C.T. (CONATURA, Arequipa, Peru.)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)</atitle><jtitle>American journal of botany</jtitle><date>1996-10</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1329</spage><epage>1336</epage><pages>1329-1336</pages><issn>0002-9122</issn><eissn>1537-2197</eissn><coden>AJBOAA</coden><abstract>I present data on flower morphology, pollination, breeding system, and genetic diversity of the columnar cactus Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri at 2500m elevation in southwestern Peru. Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri is a self-compatible columnar cactus that is visited and pollinated by one species of rare endemic bat, Platalina genovensium, and two species of hummingbirds, Patagona gigas and Rhodopis vesper. W. weberbaueri exhibits pronounced interplant variation in floral color and size, and flowers exhibit traits corresponding to both bat and hummingbird pollination syndromes. Starch-gel electrophoresis of flower bud tissue indicated that Weberbaueri is an autotetraploid and that genetic diversity (Hep = 0.257) of the study population was high relative to diploid plants but similar to other tetraploid species. Initial fruit set from pollinator exclusion experiments conducted in 1991 and 1993, at the onset of and after a drought associated with the El Nino event of 1991-1992, revealed that bats were the most important pollinators in 1991, but that hummingbirds and diurnal insects were most important in 1993. In both years, however, autogamy and lepidopteran larval infestation of fruits reduced differences in mature fruit production among pollinator exclusion treatments so that differences in mature fruit set were not statistically significant. Reduced bat pollination in 1993 is attributed to the reduced abundance of bats at the study site during a drought caused by El Nino. I hypothesize that interaction among several factors, including tetraploidy, autogamy, larval infestation of developing fruits, and variation in pollinator abundance, may not result in strong selection for a bat vs hummingbird floral morph, thus allowing persistence of floral variation in this cactus</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>American Botanical Society</pub><doi>10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9122
ispartof American journal of botany, 1996-10, Vol.83 (10), p.1329-1336
issn 0002-9122
1537-2197
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_215881469
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects ANATOMIA DE LA PLANTA
ANATOMIE VEGETALE
Andean habitats
AUTOCOMPATIBILIDAD
AUTOCOMPATIBILITE
Bats
BEHAVIOUR
Botany
BOURGEON
BUDS
CACTACEAE
Cactus
CHIROPTERA
COLIBRI
COLOR
COLOUR
COMPORTAMIENTO
COMPORTEMENT
COROLA
COROLLA
COROLLE
COULEUR
DIMENSION
DIMENSIONS
DIURNAL ACTIVITY
FLEUR
FLORES
FLOWERS
Flowers & plants
Fruit set
FRUITS
FRUTAS
GENE
GENE FREQUENCY
GENES
GENETIC DIVERSITY
GENETIC POLYMORPHISM
GENETIC VARIATION
Genetics
GINECEO
GYNECEE
GYNOECIUM
HUMMINGBIRDS
Insect pollination
INSECTA
LARGURA
LARVAE
LARVAS
LARVE
LENGTH
LLUVIA
LONGUEUR
NOCTURNAL ACTIVITY
OISEAU MOUCHE
PERIODICIDAD
PERIODICITE
PERIODICITY
PEROU
PERU
PLANT ANATOMY
Plant reproduction
Plants
PLUIE
POLIMORFISMO GENETICO
POLINIZACION
POLINIZADORES
Pollen
Pollinating insects
POLLINATION
POLLINATORS
POLLINISATEUR
POLLINISATION
POLYMORPHISME GENETIQUE
polyploidy
RAIN
Reproductive Biology
SELF COMPATIBILITY
SIZE
STIGMA
STYLES
TETRAPLOIDIA
TETRAPLOIDIE
TETRAPLOIDY
VARIACION GENETICA
VARIATION GENETIQUE
Weberbauerocereus
YEMA (PLANTA)
title Bat and hummingbird pollination of an autotetraploid columnar cactus, Weberbauerocereus weberbaueri (Cactaceae)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bat%20and%20hummingbird%20pollination%20of%20an%20autotetraploid%20columnar%20cactus,%20Weberbauerocereus%20weberbaueri%20(Cactaceae)&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20botany&rft.au=Sahley,%20C.T.%20(CONATURA,%20Arequipa,%20Peru.)&rft.date=1996-10&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1329&rft.epage=1336&rft.pages=1329-1336&rft.issn=0002-9122&rft.eissn=1537-2197&rft.coden=AJBOAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13918.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2446118%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2368-850c2dca8f7cf2e9336c7bd768e774d9637a1908617efabc85ef909c65cf2a7f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215881469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2446118&rfr_iscdi=true