Loading…

Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit?

Chinese social media and big data represent an important share of the global Internet, but have received relatively less attention. This editorial examines three dominant discourses based on China's distinctive and complex political, economic and social realities: “Big Data” (technical focus),...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Policy and internet 2018-12, Vol.10 (4), p.372-392
Main Authors: Jiang, Min, Fu, King‐Wa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183
container_end_page 392
container_issue 4
container_start_page 372
container_title Policy and internet
container_volume 10
creator Jiang, Min
Fu, King‐Wa
description Chinese social media and big data represent an important share of the global Internet, but have received relatively less attention. This editorial examines three dominant discourses based on China's distinctive and complex political, economic and social realities: “Big Data” (technical focus), “Big Brother” (political focus), and “Big Profit” (economic focus). We argue that the prevailing discourse and practice of big data in China is largely technocentric, decontextualized and nonreflexive, and much less attuned to the social, political, cultural, epistemological, and ethical implications of big data that a humancentric approach would demand. Second, the authoritarian Chinese state poses incredible political challenges to big data research and practice. Third, the practice of Chinese social media and big data is imbued with a discourse of technological nationalism, driven by a handful of monopolistic “national champions.” Despite contention, the state and market players have formed a largely mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship to maximize their political and economic gains. We argue a comparative perspective to foster a global conversation on social media and big data is necessary in order to formulate collective responses to such challenges. 抽象 中国社交媒体和大数据在全球互联网中占据了重要部分, 但其受到的关注却相对较少。本篇社论考察了三大主导话语, 这三者基于中国独特而又复杂的政治现实、经济现实和社会现实。它们分别是: “大数据”(技术焦点)、“老大哥”(政治焦点)、“大利润”(经济焦点)。笔者主张, 中国大数据的普遍话语和实践在很大程度上都是以技术为中心、去语境化、不具备反思性 在很大程度上它的社会、政治、文化、认识论和道德标准与以人为本的大数据视角相违背。其次, 实行威权主义的中国对大数据研究和实践产生了极大的政治挑战。中国社交媒体和大数据实践充满了一种技术民族主义话语, 这一话语为少数实行垄断的“国家龙头企业”驱动。国家参与者和市场参与者虽然有时利益相左但它们已形成了一种互利共生的关系, 从而取得政治利益和经济利益最大化。笔者主张, 需要以一种比较的视角来促进全球在社交媒体和大数据上的交流, 从而对上述挑战形成集体响应。 Resumen Las redes sociales chinas y los grandes datos representan una parte importante de Internet global, pero han recibido relativamente menos atención. Este editorial examina tres discursos dominantes basados en las realidades políticas, económicas y sociales distintivas y complejas de China: “Big Data” (enfoque técnico), “Big Brother” (enfoque político) y “Big Profit” (enfoque económico). Argumentamos que el discurso y la práctica predominantes del Big Data en China es en gran medida tecnocéntrico, descontextualizado y no reflexivo, y mucho menos acorde con las implicaciones sociales, políticas, culturales, epistemológicas y éticas del Big Data que un ser humano −el enfoque céntrico exigiría. En segundo lugar, el estado autoritario chino plantea desafíos políticos increíbles para la investigación y la práctica
doi_str_mv 10.1002/poi3.187
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2159932043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2159932043</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbBnxDw4sHU_Uqy8SI2Vi1UWlDPyyaZtVtiNu6mlP57EyPixdO8Aw_vDA9C5wRPCMb0urGGTYhIDtCIpJyHVMTx4Z98jE6832AcC8bpCM2ytanBQ_BiC6Oq4BlKowJVl8HUvAf3qlU3v-nqO02dbdfghmXlrDbt7Sk60qrycPYzx-jtYfaaPYWL5eM8u1uEBaNJEvLuASWKkmKeAuE5BhqpnOeExjlmJQeIck2FSKhIdRoLinPNhBakBEw4EWyMLobextnPLfhWbuzW1d1JSUmUpqxrZh11OVCFs9470LJx5kO5vSRY9pJkL0l2kjo0HNCdqWD_LydXyznr-S8AaGQO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2159932043</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Jiang, Min ; Fu, King‐Wa</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Min ; Fu, King‐Wa</creatorcontrib><description>Chinese social media and big data represent an important share of the global Internet, but have received relatively less attention. This editorial examines three dominant discourses based on China's distinctive and complex political, economic and social realities: “Big Data” (technical focus), “Big Brother” (political focus), and “Big Profit” (economic focus). We argue that the prevailing discourse and practice of big data in China is largely technocentric, decontextualized and nonreflexive, and much less attuned to the social, political, cultural, epistemological, and ethical implications of big data that a humancentric approach would demand. Second, the authoritarian Chinese state poses incredible political challenges to big data research and practice. Third, the practice of Chinese social media and big data is imbued with a discourse of technological nationalism, driven by a handful of monopolistic “national champions.” Despite contention, the state and market players have formed a largely mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship to maximize their political and economic gains. We argue a comparative perspective to foster a global conversation on social media and big data is necessary in order to formulate collective responses to such challenges. 抽象 中国社交媒体和大数据在全球互联网中占据了重要部分, 但其受到的关注却相对较少。本篇社论考察了三大主导话语, 这三者基于中国独特而又复杂的政治现实、经济现实和社会现实。它们分别是: “大数据”(技术焦点)、“老大哥”(政治焦点)、“大利润”(经济焦点)。笔者主张, 中国大数据的普遍话语和实践在很大程度上都是以技术为中心、去语境化、不具备反思性 在很大程度上它的社会、政治、文化、认识论和道德标准与以人为本的大数据视角相违背。其次, 实行威权主义的中国对大数据研究和实践产生了极大的政治挑战。中国社交媒体和大数据实践充满了一种技术民族主义话语, 这一话语为少数实行垄断的“国家龙头企业”驱动。国家参与者和市场参与者虽然有时利益相左但它们已形成了一种互利共生的关系, 从而取得政治利益和经济利益最大化。笔者主张, 需要以一种比较的视角来促进全球在社交媒体和大数据上的交流, 从而对上述挑战形成集体响应。 Resumen Las redes sociales chinas y los grandes datos representan una parte importante de Internet global, pero han recibido relativamente menos atención. Este editorial examina tres discursos dominantes basados en las realidades políticas, económicas y sociales distintivas y complejas de China: “Big Data” (enfoque técnico), “Big Brother” (enfoque político) y “Big Profit” (enfoque económico). Argumentamos que el discurso y la práctica predominantes del Big Data en China es en gran medida tecnocéntrico, descontextualizado y no reflexivo, y mucho menos acorde con las implicaciones sociales, políticas, culturales, epistemológicas y éticas del Big Data que un ser humano −el enfoque céntrico exigiría. En segundo lugar, el estado autoritario chino plantea desafíos políticos increíbles para la investigación y la práctica de Big Data. Tercero, la práctica de las redes sociales chinas y Big Data está imbuida de un discurso de nacionalismo tecnológico, impulsado por un puñado de “campeones nacionales” monopólicos. A pesar de la discordancia ocasional, los actores estatales y de mercado han formado una relación simbiótica mutuamente beneficiosa para maximizar sus ganancias políticas y económicas. Nosotros, que sostenemos una perspectiva comparativa para fomentar una conversación global en las redes sociales y el Big Data, es necesario para formular respuestas colectivas a tales desafíos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1944-2866</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-6019</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-2866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/poi3.187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Big Data ; business ; China ; Chinese Internet ; Conversation ; Cultural factors ; Data management ; Digital media ; Economics ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; gobierno ; government ; Internet ; Internet chino ; Mass media ; Nationalism ; negocios ; politics ; política ; redes sociales ; sistema de crédito social ; social credit system ; Social media ; Social networks ; surveillance ; vigilancia ; ética ; 中国 ; 中国互联网 ; 商业 ; 大数据 ; 政府 ; 政治 ; 监控 ; 社交媒体 ; 社会信用体系 ; 道德标准</subject><ispartof>Policy and internet, 2018-12, Vol.10 (4), p.372-392</ispartof><rights>2018 Policy Studies Organization</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, King‐Wa</creatorcontrib><title>Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit?</title><title>Policy and internet</title><description>Chinese social media and big data represent an important share of the global Internet, but have received relatively less attention. This editorial examines three dominant discourses based on China's distinctive and complex political, economic and social realities: “Big Data” (technical focus), “Big Brother” (political focus), and “Big Profit” (economic focus). We argue that the prevailing discourse and practice of big data in China is largely technocentric, decontextualized and nonreflexive, and much less attuned to the social, political, cultural, epistemological, and ethical implications of big data that a humancentric approach would demand. Second, the authoritarian Chinese state poses incredible political challenges to big data research and practice. Third, the practice of Chinese social media and big data is imbued with a discourse of technological nationalism, driven by a handful of monopolistic “national champions.” Despite contention, the state and market players have formed a largely mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship to maximize their political and economic gains. We argue a comparative perspective to foster a global conversation on social media and big data is necessary in order to formulate collective responses to such challenges. 抽象 中国社交媒体和大数据在全球互联网中占据了重要部分, 但其受到的关注却相对较少。本篇社论考察了三大主导话语, 这三者基于中国独特而又复杂的政治现实、经济现实和社会现实。它们分别是: “大数据”(技术焦点)、“老大哥”(政治焦点)、“大利润”(经济焦点)。笔者主张, 中国大数据的普遍话语和实践在很大程度上都是以技术为中心、去语境化、不具备反思性 在很大程度上它的社会、政治、文化、认识论和道德标准与以人为本的大数据视角相违背。其次, 实行威权主义的中国对大数据研究和实践产生了极大的政治挑战。中国社交媒体和大数据实践充满了一种技术民族主义话语, 这一话语为少数实行垄断的“国家龙头企业”驱动。国家参与者和市场参与者虽然有时利益相左但它们已形成了一种互利共生的关系, 从而取得政治利益和经济利益最大化。笔者主张, 需要以一种比较的视角来促进全球在社交媒体和大数据上的交流, 从而对上述挑战形成集体响应。 Resumen Las redes sociales chinas y los grandes datos representan una parte importante de Internet global, pero han recibido relativamente menos atención. Este editorial examina tres discursos dominantes basados en las realidades políticas, económicas y sociales distintivas y complejas de China: “Big Data” (enfoque técnico), “Big Brother” (enfoque político) y “Big Profit” (enfoque económico). Argumentamos que el discurso y la práctica predominantes del Big Data en China es en gran medida tecnocéntrico, descontextualizado y no reflexivo, y mucho menos acorde con las implicaciones sociales, políticas, culturales, epistemológicas y éticas del Big Data que un ser humano −el enfoque céntrico exigiría. En segundo lugar, el estado autoritario chino plantea desafíos políticos increíbles para la investigación y la práctica de Big Data. Tercero, la práctica de las redes sociales chinas y Big Data está imbuida de un discurso de nacionalismo tecnológico, impulsado por un puñado de “campeones nacionales” monopólicos. A pesar de la discordancia ocasional, los actores estatales y de mercado han formado una relación simbiótica mutuamente beneficiosa para maximizar sus ganancias políticas y económicas. Nosotros, que sostenemos una perspectiva comparativa para fomentar una conversación global en las redes sociales y el Big Data, es necesario para formular respuestas colectivas a tales desafíos.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>business</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese Internet</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Data management</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>gobierno</subject><subject>government</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internet chino</subject><subject>Mass media</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>negocios</subject><subject>politics</subject><subject>política</subject><subject>redes sociales</subject><subject>sistema de crédito social</subject><subject>social credit system</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>surveillance</subject><subject>vigilancia</subject><subject>ética</subject><subject>中国</subject><subject>中国互联网</subject><subject>商业</subject><subject>大数据</subject><subject>政府</subject><subject>政治</subject><subject>监控</subject><subject>社交媒体</subject><subject>社会信用体系</subject><subject>道德标准</subject><issn>1944-2866</issn><issn>2194-6019</issn><issn>1944-2866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbBnxDw4sHU_Uqy8SI2Vi1UWlDPyyaZtVtiNu6mlP57EyPixdO8Aw_vDA9C5wRPCMb0urGGTYhIDtCIpJyHVMTx4Z98jE6832AcC8bpCM2ytanBQ_BiC6Oq4BlKowJVl8HUvAf3qlU3v-nqO02dbdfghmXlrDbt7Sk60qrycPYzx-jtYfaaPYWL5eM8u1uEBaNJEvLuASWKkmKeAuE5BhqpnOeExjlmJQeIck2FSKhIdRoLinPNhBakBEw4EWyMLobextnPLfhWbuzW1d1JSUmUpqxrZh11OVCFs9470LJx5kO5vSRY9pJkL0l2kjo0HNCdqWD_LydXyznr-S8AaGQO</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Jiang, Min</creator><creator>Fu, King‐Wa</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit?</title><author>Jiang, Min ; Fu, King‐Wa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>business</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese Internet</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Data management</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>gobierno</topic><topic>government</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internet chino</topic><topic>Mass media</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>negocios</topic><topic>politics</topic><topic>política</topic><topic>redes sociales</topic><topic>sistema de crédito social</topic><topic>social credit system</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>surveillance</topic><topic>vigilancia</topic><topic>ética</topic><topic>中国</topic><topic>中国互联网</topic><topic>商业</topic><topic>大数据</topic><topic>政府</topic><topic>政治</topic><topic>监控</topic><topic>社交媒体</topic><topic>社会信用体系</topic><topic>道德标准</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, King‐Wa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Policy and internet</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Min</au><au>Fu, King‐Wa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit?</atitle><jtitle>Policy and internet</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>372-392</pages><issn>1944-2866</issn><issn>2194-6019</issn><eissn>1944-2866</eissn><abstract>Chinese social media and big data represent an important share of the global Internet, but have received relatively less attention. This editorial examines three dominant discourses based on China's distinctive and complex political, economic and social realities: “Big Data” (technical focus), “Big Brother” (political focus), and “Big Profit” (economic focus). We argue that the prevailing discourse and practice of big data in China is largely technocentric, decontextualized and nonreflexive, and much less attuned to the social, political, cultural, epistemological, and ethical implications of big data that a humancentric approach would demand. Second, the authoritarian Chinese state poses incredible political challenges to big data research and practice. Third, the practice of Chinese social media and big data is imbued with a discourse of technological nationalism, driven by a handful of monopolistic “national champions.” Despite contention, the state and market players have formed a largely mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship to maximize their political and economic gains. We argue a comparative perspective to foster a global conversation on social media and big data is necessary in order to formulate collective responses to such challenges. 抽象 中国社交媒体和大数据在全球互联网中占据了重要部分, 但其受到的关注却相对较少。本篇社论考察了三大主导话语, 这三者基于中国独特而又复杂的政治现实、经济现实和社会现实。它们分别是: “大数据”(技术焦点)、“老大哥”(政治焦点)、“大利润”(经济焦点)。笔者主张, 中国大数据的普遍话语和实践在很大程度上都是以技术为中心、去语境化、不具备反思性 在很大程度上它的社会、政治、文化、认识论和道德标准与以人为本的大数据视角相违背。其次, 实行威权主义的中国对大数据研究和实践产生了极大的政治挑战。中国社交媒体和大数据实践充满了一种技术民族主义话语, 这一话语为少数实行垄断的“国家龙头企业”驱动。国家参与者和市场参与者虽然有时利益相左但它们已形成了一种互利共生的关系, 从而取得政治利益和经济利益最大化。笔者主张, 需要以一种比较的视角来促进全球在社交媒体和大数据上的交流, 从而对上述挑战形成集体响应。 Resumen Las redes sociales chinas y los grandes datos representan una parte importante de Internet global, pero han recibido relativamente menos atención. Este editorial examina tres discursos dominantes basados en las realidades políticas, económicas y sociales distintivas y complejas de China: “Big Data” (enfoque técnico), “Big Brother” (enfoque político) y “Big Profit” (enfoque económico). Argumentamos que el discurso y la práctica predominantes del Big Data en China es en gran medida tecnocéntrico, descontextualizado y no reflexivo, y mucho menos acorde con las implicaciones sociales, políticas, culturales, epistemológicas y éticas del Big Data que un ser humano −el enfoque céntrico exigiría. En segundo lugar, el estado autoritario chino plantea desafíos políticos increíbles para la investigación y la práctica de Big Data. Tercero, la práctica de las redes sociales chinas y Big Data está imbuida de un discurso de nacionalismo tecnológico, impulsado por un puñado de “campeones nacionales” monopólicos. A pesar de la discordancia ocasional, los actores estatales y de mercado han formado una relación simbiótica mutuamente beneficiosa para maximizar sus ganancias políticas y económicas. Nosotros, que sostenemos una perspectiva comparativa para fomentar una conversación global en las redes sociales y el Big Data, es necesario para formular respuestas colectivas a tales desafíos.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/poi3.187</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1944-2866
ispartof Policy and internet, 2018-12, Vol.10 (4), p.372-392
issn 1944-2866
2194-6019
1944-2866
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2159932043
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Authoritarianism
Big Data
business
China
Chinese Internet
Conversation
Cultural factors
Data management
Digital media
Economics
Epistemology
Ethics
gobierno
government
Internet
Internet chino
Mass media
Nationalism
negocios
politics
política
redes sociales
sistema de crédito social
social credit system
Social media
Social networks
surveillance
vigilancia
ética
中国
中国互联网
商业
大数据
政府
政治
监控
社交媒体
社会信用体系
道德标准
title Chinese Social Media and Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother, Big Profit?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chinese%20Social%20Media%20and%20Big%20Data:%20Big%20Data,%20Big%20Brother,%20Big%20Profit?&rft.jtitle=Policy%20and%20internet&rft.au=Jiang,%20Min&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=372-392&rft.issn=1944-2866&rft.eissn=1944-2866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/poi3.187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2159932043%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3277-4286a8cd2049e14b0e25ab4b126b03d4ee5bf2887289f96820bf38f81de014183%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2159932043&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true