Loading…

Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History

The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water environment research 1999-01, Vol.71 (1), p.5-9
Main Authors: Sutton, Paul M., Hurvid, Jim, Hoeksema, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3
cites
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Water environment research
container_volume 71
creator Sutton, Paul M.
Hurvid, Jim
Hoeksema, Martin
description The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.
doi_str_mv 10.2175/106143099X121698
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216061113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25045167</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25045167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEURYeSQh2n-24KInQ7qZ6-Zia72th1IBBoEtLdIEtPQc545EozGOfXV8EhhW6ykuDdc_V0iuIL0AsGlfwOVIHgtGl-AwPV1B-KCUgpykpyOMn3PC7znH8qTlPaUAqMUTEpNjMfuvDoje7Ishu99c9oyxlachdRD1vsBxIcedBpwL0eMBIXw5bMDrsY7GgGMg9Pvn8kNzuMevChT5dkOXZdeZsbkcx1QrLyaQjxcFZ8dLpL-Pn1nBb3y8XdfFVe3_y8mv-4Lo3gXJZrDspYYThDVFA7XishrKLIFQerKrBOuDUzTV05C4pZgxWz9VpUDdg1c3xanB9784p_RkxDuwlj7POTbTaTPQDwHKLHkIkhpYiu3UW_1fHQAm1fhLb_C83It9denfLnXNS98ekfl1cTDeSYPMb2vsPDu7Xtw-IXpVRm7uuR27zYeuOYpELmbv4XC6SN7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216061113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Sutton, Paul M. ; Hurvid, Jim ; Hoeksema, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Paul M. ; Hurvid, Jim ; Hoeksema, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2175/106143099X121698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biomass ; Biotechnology ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Coal and derived products ; COKING OPERATIONS ; Energy ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS ; Fuels ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Industrial effluents ; Industrial wastewaters ; Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc ; PHENOLICS REDUCTION ; Pollution ; Reactor design ; Research Papers ; Sand ; Start up firms ; THIOCYANATE REDUCTION ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 1999-01, Vol.71 (1), p.5-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 The Water Environment Federation (WEF)</rights><rights>1999 Water Environment Federation</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Water Environment Federation Jan/Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25045167$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25045167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1671491$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurvid, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeksema, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</title><title>Water environment research</title><description>The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Coal and derived products</subject><subject>COKING OPERATIONS</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Industrial effluents</subject><subject>Industrial wastewaters</subject><subject>Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc</subject><subject>PHENOLICS REDUCTION</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reactor design</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Start up firms</subject><subject>THIOCYANATE REDUCTION</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEURYeSQh2n-24KInQ7qZ6-Zia72th1IBBoEtLdIEtPQc545EozGOfXV8EhhW6ykuDdc_V0iuIL0AsGlfwOVIHgtGl-AwPV1B-KCUgpykpyOMn3PC7znH8qTlPaUAqMUTEpNjMfuvDoje7Ishu99c9oyxlachdRD1vsBxIcedBpwL0eMBIXw5bMDrsY7GgGMg9Pvn8kNzuMevChT5dkOXZdeZsbkcx1QrLyaQjxcFZ8dLpL-Pn1nBb3y8XdfFVe3_y8mv-4Lo3gXJZrDspYYThDVFA7XishrKLIFQerKrBOuDUzTV05C4pZgxWz9VpUDdg1c3xanB9784p_RkxDuwlj7POTbTaTPQDwHKLHkIkhpYiu3UW_1fHQAm1fhLb_C83It9denfLnXNS98ekfl1cTDeSYPMb2vsPDu7Xtw-IXpVRm7uuR27zYeuOYpELmbv4XC6SN7Q</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Sutton, Paul M.</creator><creator>Hurvid, Jim</creator><creator>Hoeksema, Martin</creator><general>Water Environment Federation</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</title><author>Sutton, Paul M. ; Hurvid, Jim ; Hoeksema, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Coal and derived products</topic><topic>COKING OPERATIONS</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Industrial effluents</topic><topic>Industrial wastewaters</topic><topic>Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc</topic><topic>PHENOLICS REDUCTION</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reactor design</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Start up firms</topic><topic>THIOCYANATE REDUCTION</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurvid, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeksema, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sutton, Paul M.</au><au>Hurvid, Jim</au><au>Hoeksema, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>5-9</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>Water Environment Federation</pub><doi>10.2175/106143099X121698</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-4303
ispartof Water environment research, 1999-01, Vol.71 (1), p.5-9
issn 1061-4303
1554-7531
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_216061113
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Ammonia
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
Biological treatment of waters
Biomass
Biotechnology
Chemical oxygen demand
Coal and derived products
COKING OPERATIONS
Energy
Environment and pollution
Exact sciences and technology
FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS
Fuels
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects
Industrial effluents
Industrial wastewaters
Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc
PHENOLICS REDUCTION
Pollution
Reactor design
Research Papers
Sand
Start up firms
THIOCYANATE REDUCTION
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Wastewaters
Water treatment and pollution
title Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20Fluidized-Bed%20Treatment%20of%20Wastewater%20from%20Byproduct%20Coking%20Operations:%20Full-Scale%20Case%20History&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Sutton,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=5-9&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.2175/106143099X121698&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25045167%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216061113&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25045167&rfr_iscdi=true