Loading…
Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History
The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases....
Saved in:
Published in: | Water environment research 1999-01, Vol.71 (1), p.5-9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 5 |
container_title | Water environment research |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Sutton, Paul M. Hurvid, Jim Hoeksema, Martin |
description | The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2175/106143099X121698 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_216061113</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25045167</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25045167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEURYeSQh2n-24KInQ7qZ6-Zia72th1IBBoEtLdIEtPQc545EozGOfXV8EhhW6ykuDdc_V0iuIL0AsGlfwOVIHgtGl-AwPV1B-KCUgpykpyOMn3PC7znH8qTlPaUAqMUTEpNjMfuvDoje7Ishu99c9oyxlachdRD1vsBxIcedBpwL0eMBIXw5bMDrsY7GgGMg9Pvn8kNzuMevChT5dkOXZdeZsbkcx1QrLyaQjxcFZ8dLpL-Pn1nBb3y8XdfFVe3_y8mv-4Lo3gXJZrDspYYThDVFA7XishrKLIFQerKrBOuDUzTV05C4pZgxWz9VpUDdg1c3xanB9784p_RkxDuwlj7POTbTaTPQDwHKLHkIkhpYiu3UW_1fHQAm1fhLb_C83It9denfLnXNS98ekfl1cTDeSYPMb2vsPDu7Xtw-IXpVRm7uuR27zYeuOYpELmbv4XC6SN7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216061113</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Sutton, Paul M. ; Hurvid, Jim ; Hoeksema, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Paul M. ; Hurvid, Jim ; Hoeksema, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-4303</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-7531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2175/106143099X121698</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria, VA: Water Environment Federation</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biomass ; Biotechnology ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Coal and derived products ; COKING OPERATIONS ; Energy ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS ; Fuels ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Industrial effluents ; Industrial wastewaters ; Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc ; PHENOLICS REDUCTION ; Pollution ; Reactor design ; Research Papers ; Sand ; Start up firms ; THIOCYANATE REDUCTION ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water environment research, 1999-01, Vol.71 (1), p.5-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 The Water Environment Federation (WEF)</rights><rights>1999 Water Environment Federation</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Water Environment Federation Jan/Feb 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/25045167$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/25045167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,27922,27923,27924,58237,58470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1671491$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurvid, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeksema, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</title><title>Water environment research</title><description>The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.</description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Coal and derived products</subject><subject>COKING OPERATIONS</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Industrial effluents</subject><subject>Industrial wastewaters</subject><subject>Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc</subject><subject>PHENOLICS REDUCTION</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reactor design</subject><subject>Research Papers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Start up firms</subject><subject>THIOCYANATE REDUCTION</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>1061-4303</issn><issn>1554-7531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEURYeSQh2n-24KInQ7qZ6-Zia72th1IBBoEtLdIEtPQc545EozGOfXV8EhhW6ykuDdc_V0iuIL0AsGlfwOVIHgtGl-AwPV1B-KCUgpykpyOMn3PC7znH8qTlPaUAqMUTEpNjMfuvDoje7Ishu99c9oyxlachdRD1vsBxIcedBpwL0eMBIXw5bMDrsY7GgGMg9Pvn8kNzuMevChT5dkOXZdeZsbkcx1QrLyaQjxcFZ8dLpL-Pn1nBb3y8XdfFVe3_y8mv-4Lo3gXJZrDspYYThDVFA7XishrKLIFQerKrBOuDUzTV05C4pZgxWz9VpUDdg1c3xanB9784p_RkxDuwlj7POTbTaTPQDwHKLHkIkhpYiu3UW_1fHQAm1fhLb_C83It9denfLnXNS98ekfl1cTDeSYPMb2vsPDu7Xtw-IXpVRm7uuR27zYeuOYpELmbv4XC6SN7Q</recordid><startdate>19990101</startdate><enddate>19990101</enddate><creator>Sutton, Paul M.</creator><creator>Hurvid, Jim</creator><creator>Hoeksema, Martin</creator><general>Water Environment Federation</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990101</creationdate><title>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</title><author>Sutton, Paul M. ; Hurvid, Jim ; Hoeksema, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Coal and derived products</topic><topic>COKING OPERATIONS</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Industrial effluents</topic><topic>Industrial wastewaters</topic><topic>Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc</topic><topic>PHENOLICS REDUCTION</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reactor design</topic><topic>Research Papers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Start up firms</topic><topic>THIOCYANATE REDUCTION</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurvid, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeksema, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sutton, Paul M.</au><au>Hurvid, Jim</au><au>Hoeksema, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History</atitle><jtitle>Water environment research</jtitle><date>1999-01-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>5-9</pages><issn>1061-4303</issn><eissn>1554-7531</eissn><abstract>The Algoma Steel byproduct coke plant consists of three coke-oven batteries capable of producing approximately 3 000 t/d of coke. The source of the primary process wastewater from the coke plant is the excess flushing liquor or weak ammonia liquor produced during initial cooling of coke-oven gases. This raw liquor stream is directed to an ammonia still where ammonia is recovered through steam stripping. Wastewater is then directed to a biological treatment plant designed for phenolics removal. The biological treatment scheme used at Algoma is a fluidized-bed reactor (FBR) system. Design of the system anticipated a median phenolic load of 1 117 kg/d (2 463 lb/d), consisting of a phenolics concentration of 1 012 mg/L in the wastewater and a flow of 46.1${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$(203 gpm). Nine days after start-up, the FBRs were receiving more than 40${\rm m}^{3}/{\rm h}$of wastewater containing 1 000 mg/L of phenolics and an approximately equal amount of clean mill water, added as dilution water for temperature control. Effluent from the system contained less than 5 mg/L phenolics. During a 6-week performance assessment of the system, which began approximately 2 weeks after process start-up, FBRs achieved more than 99% phenolics reduction based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. Approximately 5 weeks after process start-up, thiocyanate in the effluent was reduced to less than 5 mg/L, representing approximately 95% removal based on diluted wastewater feed concentration. At this time the biomass concentration, measured as volatile solids, in the FBRs was greater than 15 g/L.</abstract><cop>Alexandria, VA</cop><pub>Water Environment Federation</pub><doi>10.2175/106143099X121698</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-4303 |
ispartof | Water environment research, 1999-01, Vol.71 (1), p.5-9 |
issn | 1061-4303 1554-7531 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_216061113 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Ammonia Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT Biological treatment of waters Biomass Biotechnology Chemical oxygen demand Coal and derived products COKING OPERATIONS Energy Environment and pollution Exact sciences and technology FLUIDIZED‐BED REACTORS Fuels Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects Industrial effluents Industrial wastewaters Miscellaneous: general maintenance, miscellaneous installations, waste waters, etc PHENOLICS REDUCTION Pollution Reactor design Research Papers Sand Start up firms THIOCYANATE REDUCTION Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water treatment and pollution |
title | Biological Fluidized-Bed Treatment of Wastewater from Byproduct Coking Operations: Full-Scale Case History |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T23%3A59%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20Fluidized-Bed%20Treatment%20of%20Wastewater%20from%20Byproduct%20Coking%20Operations:%20Full-Scale%20Case%20History&rft.jtitle=Water%20environment%20research&rft.au=Sutton,%20Paul%20M.&rft.date=1999-01-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=5-9&rft.issn=1061-4303&rft.eissn=1554-7531&rft_id=info:doi/10.2175/106143099X121698&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25045167%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4335-b316cd4c32ee618f38644d60e3631d671df4fb2c987fd162dce72d8b4791db2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216061113&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25045167&rfr_iscdi=true |