Loading…
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study
INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrum...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences 2018-01, Vol.6 (3), p.21-27 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23 |
container_end_page | 27 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Krishnan, Ajay Barot, Manish Dave, Bharat Bang, Paresh Devanand, D Patel, Denish Jain, Amit |
description | INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored.
RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P < 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/joas.joas_62_17 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2160688255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A523651427</galeid><sourcerecordid>A523651427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhQtRcJiZtduA6-rJo1IPVzaDLxjQhYK7kMdNk56qpMytoukf4v81bTuMihJIbsL5Drn3VNULRjcNo-JmnzRuTptquWLdk-qCi6arG9F-fXqq2VBz2cvn1TXinlLKZNc0fXtRff8E2a6LjpBWJEvWEX3KegpRjwSiS2jTHCxxYNM0Z0AMKRIdHbF6B2O5k_l3B5MikF3WfvnbbFwnozMJcYFskjsSv568XpEt8aAxmDCG5UhwWd3xqnrm9Yhw_eu8rL68ffP59n199_Hdh9vtXW15N8TaMN3rvrGaatdKD-CYBeP5wDwFaqSXQzuAENZ61pumMzB4wb1hvR_EYLm4rF6efeecvq2Ai9qnNZffouKspW3fcykfVTs9ggrRp9KanQJatZVctJI1vCuqzT9UZTmYgi1j8aG8_wHcnAGbE2IGr-YcJp2PilF1SlX9DPQx1UK8PhOHNJYp4v24HiCrCdx9TIf_YaUV9ZCy-AHLQLOf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160688255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Krishnan, Ajay ; Barot, Manish ; Dave, Bharat ; Bang, Paresh ; Devanand, D ; Patel, Denish ; Jain, Amit</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Ajay ; Barot, Manish ; Dave, Bharat ; Bang, Paresh ; Devanand, D ; Patel, Denish ; Jain, Amit</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored.
RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P < 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2319-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2347-436X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-7150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joas.joas_62_17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Endoscopy ; Feasibility studies ; Medical research ; Methods ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Pain ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Skin & tissue grafts ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences, 2018-01, Vol.6 (3), p.21-27</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2160688255?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barot, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Bharat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Paresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanand, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Denish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Amit</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</title><title>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences</title><description>INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored.
RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P < 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Skin & tissue grafts</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2319-2585</issn><issn>2347-436X</issn><issn>2666-7150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhQtRcJiZtduA6-rJo1IPVzaDLxjQhYK7kMdNk56qpMytoukf4v81bTuMihJIbsL5Drn3VNULRjcNo-JmnzRuTptquWLdk-qCi6arG9F-fXqq2VBz2cvn1TXinlLKZNc0fXtRff8E2a6LjpBWJEvWEX3KegpRjwSiS2jTHCxxYNM0Z0AMKRIdHbF6B2O5k_l3B5MikF3WfvnbbFwnozMJcYFskjsSv568XpEt8aAxmDCG5UhwWd3xqnrm9Yhw_eu8rL68ffP59n199_Hdh9vtXW15N8TaMN3rvrGaatdKD-CYBeP5wDwFaqSXQzuAENZ61pumMzB4wb1hvR_EYLm4rF6efeecvq2Ai9qnNZffouKspW3fcykfVTs9ggrRp9KanQJatZVctJI1vCuqzT9UZTmYgi1j8aG8_wHcnAGbE2IGr-YcJp2PilF1SlX9DPQx1UK8PhOHNJYp4v24HiCrCdx9TIf_YaUV9ZCy-AHLQLOf</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Krishnan, Ajay</creator><creator>Barot, Manish</creator><creator>Dave, Bharat</creator><creator>Bang, Paresh</creator><creator>Devanand, D</creator><creator>Patel, Denish</creator><creator>Jain, Amit</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</title><author>Krishnan, Ajay ; Barot, Manish ; Dave, Bharat ; Bang, Paresh ; Devanand, D ; Patel, Denish ; Jain, Amit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Skin & tissue grafts</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barot, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Bharat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Paresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanand, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Denish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Amit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishnan, Ajay</au><au>Barot, Manish</au><au>Dave, Bharat</au><au>Bang, Paresh</au><au>Devanand, D</au><au>Patel, Denish</au><au>Jain, Amit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>21-27</pages><issn>2319-2585</issn><eissn>2347-436X</eissn><eissn>2666-7150</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored.
RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P < 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics.
CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/joas.joas_62_17</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2319-2585 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences, 2018-01, Vol.6 (3), p.21-27 |
issn | 2319-2585 2347-436X 2666-7150 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2160688255 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); IngentaConnect Journals |
subjects | Analysis Anesthesia Endoscopy Feasibility studies Medical research Methods Minimally invasive surgery Pain Patient outcomes Patient satisfaction Skin & tissue grafts Surgeons Surgery |
title | Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A40%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20transforaminal%20endoscopic%20decompression%20and%20cageless%20percutaneous%20bone%20graft%20transforaminal%20lumbar%20interbody%20fusion:%20A%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedics%20and%20allied%20sciences&rft.au=Krishnan,%20Ajay&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=21-27&rft.issn=2319-2585&rft.eissn=2347-436X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joas.joas_62_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA523651427%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160688255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A523651427&rfr_iscdi=true |