Loading…

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences 2018-01, Vol.6 (3), p.21-27
Main Authors: Krishnan, Ajay, Barot, Manish, Dave, Bharat, Bang, Paresh, Devanand, D, Patel, Denish, Jain, Amit
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23
container_end_page 27
container_issue 3
container_start_page 21
container_title Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences
container_volume 6
creator Krishnan, Ajay
Barot, Manish
Dave, Bharat
Bang, Paresh
Devanand, D
Patel, Denish
Jain, Amit
description INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored. RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P < 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/joas.joas_62_17
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2160688255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A523651427</galeid><sourcerecordid>A523651427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhQtRcJiZtduA6-rJo1IPVzaDLxjQhYK7kMdNk56qpMytoukf4v81bTuMihJIbsL5Drn3VNULRjcNo-JmnzRuTptquWLdk-qCi6arG9F-fXqq2VBz2cvn1TXinlLKZNc0fXtRff8E2a6LjpBWJEvWEX3KegpRjwSiS2jTHCxxYNM0Z0AMKRIdHbF6B2O5k_l3B5MikF3WfvnbbFwnozMJcYFskjsSv568XpEt8aAxmDCG5UhwWd3xqnrm9Yhw_eu8rL68ffP59n199_Hdh9vtXW15N8TaMN3rvrGaatdKD-CYBeP5wDwFaqSXQzuAENZ61pumMzB4wb1hvR_EYLm4rF6efeecvq2Ai9qnNZffouKspW3fcykfVTs9ggrRp9KanQJatZVctJI1vCuqzT9UZTmYgi1j8aG8_wHcnAGbE2IGr-YcJp2PilF1SlX9DPQx1UK8PhOHNJYp4v24HiCrCdx9TIf_YaUV9ZCy-AHLQLOf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2160688255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>IngentaConnect Journals</source><creator>Krishnan, Ajay ; Barot, Manish ; Dave, Bharat ; Bang, Paresh ; Devanand, D ; Patel, Denish ; Jain, Amit</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Ajay ; Barot, Manish ; Dave, Bharat ; Bang, Paresh ; Devanand, D ; Patel, Denish ; Jain, Amit</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored. RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P &lt; 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2319-2585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2347-436X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2666-7150</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/joas.joas_62_17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Anesthesia ; Endoscopy ; Feasibility studies ; Medical research ; Methods ; Minimally invasive surgery ; Pain ; Patient outcomes ; Patient satisfaction ; Skin &amp; tissue grafts ; Surgeons ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences, 2018-01, Vol.6 (3), p.21-27</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2160688255?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barot, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Bharat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Paresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanand, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Denish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Amit</creatorcontrib><title>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</title><title>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences</title><description>INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored. RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P &lt; 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Minimally invasive surgery</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>2319-2585</issn><issn>2347-436X</issn><issn>2666-7150</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUuLFDEUhQtRcJiZtduA6-rJo1IPVzaDLxjQhYK7kMdNk56qpMytoukf4v81bTuMihJIbsL5Drn3VNULRjcNo-JmnzRuTptquWLdk-qCi6arG9F-fXqq2VBz2cvn1TXinlLKZNc0fXtRff8E2a6LjpBWJEvWEX3KegpRjwSiS2jTHCxxYNM0Z0AMKRIdHbF6B2O5k_l3B5MikF3WfvnbbFwnozMJcYFskjsSv568XpEt8aAxmDCG5UhwWd3xqnrm9Yhw_eu8rL68ffP59n199_Hdh9vtXW15N8TaMN3rvrGaatdKD-CYBeP5wDwFaqSXQzuAENZ61pumMzB4wb1hvR_EYLm4rF6efeecvq2Ai9qnNZffouKspW3fcykfVTs9ggrRp9KanQJatZVctJI1vCuqzT9UZTmYgi1j8aG8_wHcnAGbE2IGr-YcJp2PilF1SlX9DPQx1UK8PhOHNJYp4v24HiCrCdx9TIf_YaUV9ZCy-AHLQLOf</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Krishnan, Ajay</creator><creator>Barot, Manish</creator><creator>Dave, Bharat</creator><creator>Bang, Paresh</creator><creator>Devanand, D</creator><creator>Patel, Denish</creator><creator>Jain, Amit</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</title><author>Krishnan, Ajay ; Barot, Manish ; Dave, Bharat ; Bang, Paresh ; Devanand, D ; Patel, Denish ; Jain, Amit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Minimally invasive surgery</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Skin &amp; tissue grafts</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barot, Manish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dave, Bharat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bang, Paresh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devanand, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Denish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Amit</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishnan, Ajay</au><au>Barot, Manish</au><au>Dave, Bharat</au><au>Bang, Paresh</au><au>Devanand, D</au><au>Patel, Denish</au><au>Jain, Amit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences</jtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>27</epage><pages>21-27</pages><issn>2319-2585</issn><eissn>2347-436X</eissn><eissn>2666-7150</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTION: In the quest for better alternatives for open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), minimally invasive surgery-TLIF (MIS-TLIF) has evolved, and feasibility studies of transforaminal endoscopic fusion are also getting reported in western literature. However, the cost of instrumented expandable cage may make it non-feasible for Indian setup whenever it will be commercially available. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 13 patients of single-level percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft TLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation under combined local with epidural anesthesia. The results of all patients as measured by validated tools of visual analogue score-Back and Leg, Oswestry Disability Index, patient satisfaction index, and fusion. The operating time, Estimated Blood Loss, Length of hospital stay and tolerance of patient for procedure was also scored. RESULTS: All the outcome measures were significant (P &lt; 0.05) and fusion achieved in all with a mean follow-up period was 39 ± 6.36 months. Operating room time was 250.23 ± 52.90 min (187-327). Postoperative LOH hospital stay was 29.92 ± 4.94 h (24-39). The tolerance score was 2.30 ± 0.85 (1-3). One superficial bone graft site infection resolved with antibiotics. CONCLUSION: It not appealing to be recommendable to general population inspite of it being low cost and with negligible complications. Further research and engineered tools are needed to reduce the operating time.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/joas.joas_62_17</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2319-2585
ispartof Journal of orthopaedics and allied sciences, 2018-01, Vol.6 (3), p.21-27
issn 2319-2585
2347-436X
2666-7150
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2160688255
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); IngentaConnect Journals
subjects Analysis
Anesthesia
Endoscopy
Feasibility studies
Medical research
Methods
Minimally invasive surgery
Pain
Patient outcomes
Patient satisfaction
Skin & tissue grafts
Surgeons
Surgery
title Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression and cageless percutaneous bone graft transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: A feasibility study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A40%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Percutaneous%20transforaminal%20endoscopic%20decompression%20and%20cageless%20percutaneous%20bone%20graft%20transforaminal%20lumbar%20interbody%20fusion:%20A%20feasibility%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedics%20and%20allied%20sciences&rft.au=Krishnan,%20Ajay&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=27&rft.pages=21-27&rft.issn=2319-2585&rft.eissn=2347-436X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/joas.joas_62_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA523651427%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c279n-b1a8a84ca0ad65feed1cebf291f0e0b5f5969e33ccf18b47be9f32fb18f939c23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2160688255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A523651427&rfr_iscdi=true